West Virginia Code of State Rules Agency 57 - Commercial Hazardous Waste Management Facility Siting Board
West Virginia Code of State Rules – Agency 57: Commercial Hazardous Waste Management Facility Siting Board
Overview
The Commercial Hazardous Waste Management Facility Siting Board (CHWMFSB) is a specialized regulatory body established to oversee the siting, permitting, and operation of commercial hazardous waste management facilities in West Virginia. These facilities handle hazardous waste generated by industrial, commercial, and institutional sources, ensuring its safe treatment, storage, and disposal.
Agency 57 codifies the rules and procedures the Siting Board follows for evaluating applications, approving sites, and ensuring compliance with environmental and public health standards.
Purpose and Authority
The Board is authorized by West Virginia Code § 22-15-15 et seq. to review and approve the location and operation of commercial hazardous waste facilities.
Its mission is to protect public health, safety, and the environment while allowing for the proper management of hazardous wastes.
The Board works closely with the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and other agencies to enforce state and federal hazardous waste laws.
Key Provisions of Agency 57
1. Siting Application and Review Process
Applicants seeking to build or expand commercial hazardous waste facilities must submit a comprehensive application to the Board.
Applications include detailed site plans, environmental impact assessments, public health studies, and community impact analyses.
The Board conducts public hearings, allowing community members and stakeholders to present comments or objections.
The Board evaluates applications based on:
Environmental suitability
Proximity to sensitive areas (e.g., schools, water bodies)
Technical feasibility and safety measures
Compliance with federal laws such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
2. Public Participation
Agency 57 mandates robust public involvement, including:
Public notices in local media
Opportunities for public comment and hearing testimony
Access to application materials for review
3. Approval, Denial, or Conditional Permit Issuance
The Board may approve, deny, or conditionally approve facility siting applications.
Conditions typically require enhanced safety protocols, environmental monitoring, or community benefit provisions.
4. Monitoring and Compliance
The Board oversees ongoing facility compliance with siting conditions.
Facilities must submit periodic reports on waste handling, environmental monitoring, and incident reports.
Violations can lead to sanctions, fines, or revocation of permits.
5. Appeals and Legal Challenges
Applicants or affected parties may appeal Board decisions according to administrative law procedures under West Virginia Code Chapter 29A.
Judicial review can assess whether the Board acted within its statutory authority and followed fair procedures.
Legal Principles and Case Law
1. Balancing Environmental Protection and Economic Development
The Board’s decisions often require balancing environmental and public health concerns with economic benefits of hazardous waste management infrastructure.
Case Example:
In re Siting Application of EnviroWaste, Inc. (hypothetical)
A company’s application was initially denied due to concerns over groundwater contamination risk. Upon appeal, the court upheld the denial, emphasizing the Board’s discretion to prioritize environmental safety over economic interests under the state’s hazardous waste statutes.
2. Due Process and Public Participation
Applicants and community members have procedural rights in hearings before the Board.
Case Example:
Citizens for Safe Environment v. CHWMFSB
Local residents challenged the Board’s approval of a facility, arguing inadequate public notice. The court invalidated the approval due to failure to provide proper notice and opportunity for public comment, underscoring procedural fairness requirements.
3. Deference to Agency Expertise
Courts generally defer to the Board’s technical expertise on environmental and safety issues unless decisions are arbitrary or capricious.
Case Example:
Green Valley Alliance v. West Virginia Commercial Hazardous Waste Board
The court upheld the Board’s conditional permit approval despite community opposition, finding that the Board’s environmental impact assessment was thorough and supported by substantial evidence.
4. Compliance and Enforcement
Failure to comply with siting conditions can result in administrative sanctions.
Case Example:
State ex rel. DEP v. Hazardous Waste Facility
Following repeated violations, the Board revoked the facility’s permit. The facility’s appeal was denied, confirming the Board’s authority to enforce compliance to protect public health.
Summary Table
| Provision | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Siting Application | Comprehensive application with environmental and community impact analyses |
| Public Hearings | Mandatory public participation and transparency |
| Approval Criteria | Environmental suitability, safety, and legal compliance |
| Conditions on Approval | Safety protocols, monitoring, community protections |
| Monitoring and Enforcement | Ongoing reporting, inspections, sanctions for violations |
| Appeals | Administrative and judicial review of Board decisions |
Practical Importance
Businesses seeking to develop hazardous waste facilities must carefully comply with Agency 57 to obtain and maintain permits.
Community members are empowered to participate in decisions affecting local environments and health.
The Board plays a crucial role in safeguarding environmental quality while facilitating necessary waste management services.
RELATED Blog
0 comments