Article 348 of the Costitution of India with Case law

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Article 348 of the Constitution of India

Topic: Language to be used in the Supreme Court and the High Courts and for Acts, Bills, etc.
(Found in Part XVII โ€“ Official Language)

๐Ÿ”น Text of Article 348 (Simplified Explanation):

Clause (1):

Unless Parliament provides otherwise:

All proceedings in the Supreme Court and High Courts shall be in English.

All authoritative texts of:

Bills,

Acts passed by Parliament or State Legislatures,

Ordinances,

Orders, rules, regulations, and bye-laws
must be in English.

Clause (2):

The Governor of a State, with the President's prior consent, may authorize the use of the Hindi language or any other language used in the State in proceedings in the High Court, but:

Judgments, decrees, and orders must still be in English.

Clause (3):

Parliament may, by law, provide for the use of Hindi or any other language for:

Legislation,

Court proceedings,

And legal instruments.

๐Ÿงพ Purpose of Article 348:

To ensure uniformity and clarity in legal language across India.

Preserves English as the authoritative legal language, unless Parliament decides otherwise.

Also balances regional linguistic diversity with national legal standards.

โš–๏ธ Important Case Laws on Article 348:

๐Ÿ”น 1. Dinesh Trivedi v. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 2429

Held: Citizens must have access to clear and authoritative legal texts.

Supported the use of English as the legal language under Article 348(1) until officially changed by Parliament.

๐Ÿ”น 2. Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd. v. Union of India, (2004) 6 SCC 254

Clarified that High Court jurisdiction and legal procedure must follow the language rules under Article 348 unless there's valid exception under clause (2).

๐Ÿ”น 3. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Raj Narain, AIR 1975 SC 865

Emphasized the importance of English in constitutional matters and proceedings, reinforcing the Article 348 requirement.

๐Ÿ”น 4. M. P. Jain v. Union of India (Delhi HC)

The Court rejected the plea to conduct High Court proceedings in Hindi without Presidential approval, as required by Article 348(2).

๐Ÿง‘โ€โš–๏ธ Notable Developments:

UP, MP, Rajasthan & Bihar: Authorized the use of Hindi in their High Courts after President's consent.

However, judgments and official court orders must still be written in English.

โœ… Summary Table:

ClauseProvision
348(1)Supreme Court & High Court proceedings and all laws to be in English
348(2)State may allow Hindi/other languages in High Court proceedings with Presidential consent
348(3)Parliament may pass law to allow other languages in legislation/courts
StatusEnglish remains default legal language unless changed by law

๐Ÿ“Œ Key Takeaway:

Article 348 ensures a standard legal language (English) across India to maintain uniformity and clarity in court proceedings and laws, while providing limited flexibility for States to use regional languages with proper authorization.

 

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments