Idaho Administrative Code Title IDAPA 62 - Administrative Hearings, Office of
Overview of IDAPA 62 — Administrative Hearings, Office of
IDAPA 62 contains the administrative rules that regulate the procedures, standards, and operations of the Office of Administrative Hearings in Idaho. This office is responsible for conducting fair and impartial hearings related to disputes involving state agencies, ensuring due process in administrative decisions.
Purpose of IDAPA 62
To establish uniform rules and procedures for administrative hearings in Idaho.
To ensure hearings are conducted fairly, efficiently, and transparently.
To provide an independent forum for resolving disputes between individuals or entities and state agencies.
To protect the rights of parties involved in administrative proceedings.
To clarify the powers and duties of administrative law judges (ALJs).
Key Components of IDAPA 62
1. Scope and Applicability
Applies to contested cases and hearings conducted under Idaho state administrative law.
Covers hearings involving various state agencies, departments, commissions, and boards.
Includes both formal and informal administrative proceedings.
2. Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
Defines the role, authority, and qualifications of ALJs.
ALJs preside over hearings impartially, rule on motions, take evidence, and issue decisions or recommended orders.
ALJs operate independently from the agencies involved.
3. Notice and Filing Requirements
Specifies how parties are notified of hearings.
Outlines the requirements for filing petitions, responses, motions, and other documents.
Sets deadlines and format standards to ensure proper case management.
4. Conduct of Hearings
Provides rules for pre-hearing conferences, evidence presentation, witness examination, and record-keeping.
Allows parties to be represented by attorneys or other representatives.
Sets procedures for subpoenas, discovery, and protective orders.
Ensures hearings are open to the public, except where confidentiality is required.
5. Evidence and Burden of Proof
Establishes standards for the admissibility of evidence (e.g., relevant, material, and reliable).
Allows for the use of hearsay under certain circumstances.
Defines the burden of proof and standard of evidence, generally “preponderance of the evidence.”
6. Decisions and Orders
Describes how ALJs issue initial decisions or recommended orders.
Details the process for agencies to adopt, modify, or reject ALJ decisions.
Explains the timelines for issuing decisions and notifying parties.
7. Appeals and Review
Provides guidance on how parties may appeal or seek review of agency decisions.
Specifies procedures for filing appeals with the appropriate court or tribunal.
Clarifies the scope of judicial review of administrative actions.
8. Miscellaneous Provisions
Addresses disqualification of ALJs due to conflicts of interest.
Sets rules on continuances, sanctions, and contempt for noncompliance.
Details record retention and public access to hearing records.
Importance of IDAPA 62
Ensures that administrative hearings in Idaho are conducted fairly, consistently, and transparently.
Provides a clear procedural framework that safeguards due process rights.
Promotes efficiency by standardizing filing and hearing procedures.
Supports the impartiality and independence of administrative law judges.
Helps resolve disputes between citizens and government agencies without resorting to full court litigation.
Summary Table
| Section | Description |
|---|---|
| Scope | Applies to contested cases and administrative hearings |
| ALJs | Defines roles, authority, and independence of judges |
| Notice and Filing | Procedures for notice, document filing, and deadlines |
| Hearing Conduct | Rules on evidence, witnesses, representation, and procedure |
| Evidence & Burden | Admissibility standards and burden of proof |
| Decisions | Issuance, adoption, and notification of hearing decisions |
| Appeals | Procedures for appealing administrative decisions |
| Miscellaneous | Disqualification, sanctions, continuances, and record-keeping |
RELATED Blog
0 comments