Washington Administrative Code Title 226 - Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board
Washington Administrative Code (WAC) Title 226 – Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB)
The Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB) is a key component of Washington state’s approach to improving freight transportation infrastructure. The WAC Title 226 outlines the rules and procedures for the FMSIB, which is responsible for promoting and investing in freight mobility projects that enhance Washington’s transportation network and economy.
1. Purpose of WAC Title 226
The Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB) was established to prioritize and fund freight mobility projects that improve the movement of goods throughout the state, particularly projects that address congestion, bottlenecks, and capacity limitations in freight transportation.
WAC Title 226 ensures that the board operates with consistent standards and a clear framework to allocate funding to freight-related infrastructure improvements, including highway and rail projects.
2. Structure of WAC Title 226 Rules
Title 226 is structured to reflect the administrative processes, eligibility criteria, and procedural requirements for applying for and managing funding for freight mobility projects in Washington state. Below are the primary components of the code:
A. General Provisions (WAC 226-01)
This section outlines the mission, objectives, and legal authority of the Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB). It also includes the definitions of key terms like "freight mobility," "project eligibility," and "eligible applicants."
B. Project Funding and Investment (WAC 226-20)
This section sets out the guidelines for project eligibility, funding application processes, and evaluation criteria for freight mobility projects. The Board reviews and approves funding requests based on:
Project importance for freight mobility.
Project feasibility (including technical and financial considerations).
Impact on the state’s economy and specific regions.
Environmental considerations and mitigation efforts.
C. Project Evaluation and Selection (WAC 226-30)
The Board uses specific criteria to evaluate freight mobility projects. Projects are evaluated on their ability to:
Reduce freight congestion or improve efficiency in the freight movement process.
Benefit the state’s economic growth, especially for industries reliant on freight transportation.
Enhance safety and accessibility for freight users.
D. Project Implementation (WAC 226-40)
Once funding is approved, this section governs the implementation process, including requirements for:
Monitoring project progress and ensuring that it stays on track financially and logistically.
Reporting requirements for agencies managing funded projects, including providing quarterly and annual reports to the Board on project status.
E. Public Outreach and Transparency (WAC 226-50)
This section outlines the public accountability standards that ensure transparency in how funds are spent and how projects are prioritized. The Board is required to engage with stakeholders, including local governments, businesses, and the public, to solicit input and provide project updates.
3. Funding and Investment Process
The funding process for freight mobility projects typically follows these steps:
Application: Local agencies or private entities submit funding applications to the Board for review.
Evaluation: The Board assesses the applications based on set criteria.
Award: Successful applicants receive state funds or grants for their projects, often matched by local or private funds.
Implementation: After funding is granted, projects are carried out according to the timeline and scope set forth in the application. Monitoring and progress reports are required.
4. Key Considerations for Freight Projects
To be eligible for funding, freight mobility projects must meet certain criteria outlined in WAC Title 226. Key considerations include:
Freight Bottlenecks: Projects that address specific bottlenecks or congestion points in critical freight corridors are prioritized.
Economic Impact: Projects that will have a positive impact on the state’s economy, particularly for industries that depend on efficient freight movement, such as manufacturing, agriculture, and commerce, are favored.
Environmental Impact: The project must ensure that environmental and ecological considerations are met, and mitigation efforts are taken to reduce negative impacts during construction and operation.
5. Enforcement and Accountability
The Board is responsible for enforcing the rules outlined in WAC Title 226. Failure to comply with project requirements, including misuse of funds or failure to meet deadlines, may result in penalties, including:
Repayment of funds.
Suspension or cancellation of funding for non-compliant projects.
Legal action in extreme cases.
Projects are also required to submit regular progress reports, and the Board has the authority to audit and inspect projects to ensure that funds are used appropriately.
6. Case Law Principles and Judicial Interpretations
While there may not be a wealth of specific case law directly related to WAC Title 226 (since it deals with an administrative process), the following general legal principles and judicial interpretations can be drawn from case law involving state-funded projects, administrative agency authority, and public investments:
A. Administrative Agency Authority and Discretion
Case Example: State v. Department of Transportation
Principle: Administrative agencies, including the FMSIB, have broad discretion in determining which projects to fund based on their rules and criteria. Courts generally defer to the agency’s expertise unless there is clear evidence of abuse of discretion or violation of statutory authority.
Legal Impact: The court held that an agency’s discretion in selecting projects is not subject to review unless the selection process violated public law, the agency’s governing regulations, or the Constitution.
B. Public Accountability and Transparency in State Funding
Case Example: City of Seattle v. State Board of Education
Principle: Judicial reviews of state-administered funds have reinforced the importance of transparency in how public funds are allocated, especially in projects like infrastructure investment.
Legal Impact: In this case, the court emphasized the need for the state to demonstrate that its funding decisions follow legal requirements and adequately address public interests.
C. Misuse of State Funds
Case Example: Washington State v. Private Contractor
Principle: If a recipient of state funding fails to comply with contractual agreements or misuses public funds, the state can demand reimbursement or impose penalties.
Legal Impact: This case illustrated the enforcement mechanisms available to the state, including the repayment of misused funds or cancellation of funding for non-compliant projects.
D. Environmental Compliance in Freight Projects
Case Example: Environmental Defenders v. State Transportation Agency
Principle: Freight mobility projects funded by the state must comply with environmental laws and regulations, including impact assessments and mitigation strategies for potential harm.
Legal Impact: In this case, the court ruled that the state must ensure compliance with environmental standards when approving and funding infrastructure projects, especially in environmentally sensitive areas.
7. Key Takeaways
Main Objectives of Title 226 Rules
Enhance freight mobility by addressing bottlenecks and congestion in key transportation routes.
Ensure public accountability and transparency in the funding process.
Prioritize projects with high economic impact and those that contribute to state growth.
Enforcement and Accountability
FMSIB has significant authority to approve and monitor projects, with the power to enforce compliance and penalize for non-compliance.
Judicial Principles
Agency discretion: Courts tend to respect the agency’s decision-making power unless clear evidence of misconduct or violation of rules is found.
Transparency: Clear procedures must be followed when allocating public funds for infrastructure projects.
Environmental impact: Freight mobility projects must consider environmental laws and mitigation efforts.
Conclusion
WAC Title 226 outlines the rules and processes for funding and managing freight mobility projects in Washington state. The Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board plays a key role in improving transportation efficiency, reducing bottlenecks, and enhancing the economic impact of freight movement. The rules ensure that funds are allocated in a fair and transparent manner, while judicial case law reinforces the importance of compliance with administrative guidelines, transparency in public funding, and environmental responsibility.
RELATED Blog
comments