Doctrine of Incidental and Ancillary Powers
Doctrine of Incidental and Ancillary Powers – Meaning
Definition:
The Doctrine of Incidental and Ancillary Powers allows a legislature or governmental authority to take actions or make laws that are necessary to implement a primary power granted by the Constitution, even if the Constitution does not explicitly mention those actions.
In simpler terms, it permits the exercise of powers that are impliedly necessary to give effect to an express constitutional provision.
These powers are not unlimited; they must be reasonably related to the main power and necessary for its effective exercise.
Key Features
Implied Authority:
Powers not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution but impliedly necessary to exercise an express power.
Necessary for Effective Exercise:
Ensures the main power is meaningful and not rendered ineffective.
Judicial Recognition:
Courts recognize that practical governance may require incidental or ancillary powers.
Limitations:
Must be reasonably connected to the primary power.
Cannot expand the scope of the primary power arbitrarily.
Constitutional Basis in India
Article 246: Allocation of legislative powers between Parliament and State Legislatures.
Entry 97 of Union List & residuary powers: Parliament can make laws on matters incidental or ancillary to the main subjects.
Judicial recognition: Courts have upheld the doctrine to allow reasonable extension of legislative competence.
Important Case Laws
State of Bombay v. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwalla (1957)
Held that Parliament could make laws incidental to the powers conferred under the Constitution, such as regulating contracts and trade practices, to ensure the main objective of the legislation is achieved.
In Re Delhi Laws Act Case (1951)
Supreme Court recognized that residuary powers of the legislature include incidental powers necessary to give effect to enumerated powers.
K.C. Gajapati Narayan Deo v. State of Orissa (1953)
Parliament’s power to make laws necessary to protect princely states’ rights after integration was upheld as incidental to the main constitutional purpose.
Union of India v. H.S. Dhillon (1962)
Validated legislative provisions enacted to ensure effective implementation of laws relating to defense and security, under the doctrine of ancillary powers.
Significance of the Doctrine
Ensures Practical Governance:
Allows legislatures and authorities to enact provisions that make the primary law effective.
Fills Legislative Gaps:
Provides flexibility to address unforeseen circumstances or technical details not expressly mentioned in the Constitution.
Avoids Constitutional Inadequacy:
Prevents rigidity in law-making, ensuring powers are not just nominal but operative.
Limits Judicial Interference:
Courts usually defer to the reasonableness and necessity of incidental powers, provided they do not violate fundamental rights or exceed constitutional limits.
Conclusion
The Doctrine of Incidental and Ancillary Powers is an essential tool in Indian constitutional law, allowing the legislature to effectively exercise its primary powers. Courts have upheld it in multiple cases, such as State of Bombay v. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwalla and K.C. Gajapati Narayan Deo, emphasizing that while these powers are implied, they must be reasonably connected to the main legislative objective.
RELATED Blog
0 comments