North Dakota Administrative Code Title 79 - Oilseed Council
Overview of North Dakota Administrative Code Title 79 - Oilseed Council
Title 79 of the North Dakota Administrative Code (NDAC) pertains to the Oilseed Council, which is a state-established body designed to promote, regulate, and support the oilseed industry within North Dakota. This includes crops like canola, sunflower, flaxseed, and other oil-producing seeds significant to the state's agricultural economy.
Purpose and Functions of the Oilseed Council
Promotion: The council promotes research, marketing, and educational programs aimed at improving oilseed production and expanding markets.
Assessment: It is empowered to levy assessments on producers and handlers of oilseeds to fund programs and initiatives.
Regulation: The council establishes rules for the collection and use of funds, conduct of elections for council members, and reporting requirements.
Support: Facilitate cooperation among producers, processors, and marketers.
Key Provisions
1. Establishment and Governance
The council is typically made up of appointed or elected members who represent various sectors of the oilseed industry.
Members serve fixed terms and are responsible for decision-making related to the council's activities.
2. Assessments and Funding
Producers and handlers of oilseeds pay an assessment or check-off fee based on their production or sales volume.
These funds are used exclusively for research, market development, education, and other promotional activities benefiting the oilseed industry.
3. Rulemaking Authority
The council has authority to adopt administrative rules consistent with enabling legislation to govern the collection of assessments, eligibility for exemption, procedures for refunds, and other operational matters.
Legal Framework and Case Law Context
The Oilseed Council’s authority is grounded in state statutes, typically passed by the North Dakota Legislative Assembly, which are then implemented via administrative rules (Title 79 NDAC). The council’s powers and limitations, as well as challenges to its actions, have been subject to judicial review.
General Principles from Case Law (Relevant Analogies)
Though there may be no widely known, high-profile cases exclusively about the ND Oilseed Council, relevant legal principles from administrative law and agricultural commodity checkoff programs apply:
1. Delegation of Authority and Administrative Power
Case Example: J.W. Hampton Jr. & Co. v. United States, 276 U.S. 394 (1928)
This foundational case establishes that legislative bodies can delegate authority to administrative agencies or councils, provided they offer an “intelligible principle” to guide exercise of discretion.
Applied here, the North Dakota Legislature provides clear standards and purposes for the Oilseed Council’s operation, satisfying this principle.
2. Use of Checkoff Funds
Courts generally uphold checkoff programs if the funds are used for generic promotion and research, not for political advocacy or activities outside the statute’s scope.
Case Example: United States v. United Foods, Inc., 533 U.S. 405 (2001)
The Supreme Court struck down a mushroom checkoff program for violating the First Amendment because it compelled speech unrelated to collective marketing.
The ND Oilseed Council must ensure assessments fund only authorized promotional or research activities.
3. Procedural Due Process
Producers may challenge council decisions or assessments if they believe procedures weren’t properly followed.
Case Example: Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976)
Balances the interests of the government against the individual’s interest in due process.
In disputes, courts review whether the Oilseed Council provided adequate notice, hearing, and opportunity to contest assessments or penalties.
4. Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Courts often defer to administrative expertise but may overturn council rules if arbitrary, capricious, or outside the scope of authority.
Case Example: Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984)
Establishes a two-step test for courts reviewing agency interpretations of statutes.
For the Oilseed Council, courts will uphold reasonable interpretations of legislative mandates.
Summary
ND Administrative Code Title 79 governs the Oilseed Council’s authority to promote the oilseed industry through assessments and programs.
The council’s actions must comply with legislative standards, constitutional requirements (such as due process and free speech), and administrative law principles.
Case law from broader agricultural and administrative law provides a framework ensuring the council’s activities are lawful, fair, and properly administered.
RELATED Blog
0 comments