South Carolina Code of Regulations Chapter 87 - DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH

1. Purpose and Legal Authority of Chapter 87

Chapter 87 implements and supplements the South Carolina Department of Mental Health’s (SCDMH) statutory authority under Title 44 of the South Carolina Code, especially provisions governing:

Public mental health services

Civil commitment

Patient rights and protections

Operation of state psychiatric facilities

Community mental health programs

The regulations are administrative law, meaning:

They have the force of law

They must be consistent with statutes

Courts defer to them unless they conflict with constitutional or statutory rights

Judicial Principle

South Carolina courts consistently hold that DMH regulations are valid unless arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to statute.

Key case concept:
Courts will not substitute their judgment for DMH’s professional expertise unless legal rights are violated.

2. Admission, Commitment, and Discharge Procedures

A. Voluntary Admission

Chapter 87 governs:

Who may apply for voluntary admission

Consent requirements

Patient’s right to request discharge

Legal meaning

A voluntarily admitted patient retains the right to leave, subject only to short emergency detention if dangerousness is suspected.

Case Law

In re Matthews, 345 S.C. 638 (2001)
The South Carolina Supreme Court emphasized that voluntary patients cannot be converted to involuntary status without strict compliance with statutory and regulatory procedures.
This protects against informal or coercive confinement.

B. Emergency and Involuntary Commitment

Chapter 87 works alongside statutory commitment laws to regulate:

Emergency detention

Physician certification

Timelines for judicial review

Documentation requirements

Core regulatory principle

Commitment must be based on current mental illness and likelihood of serious harm

Procedural safeguards are mandatory

Case Law

Ex parte McCarter, 318 S.C. 199 (1995)
The court ruled that failure to strictly follow commitment procedures violates due process, even when mental illness is undisputed.

This case is frequently cited for the rule that:

Public safety concerns do not excuse procedural shortcuts.

3. Patient Rights and Protections

Chapter 87 codifies patient rights, including:

Humane treatment

Freedom from abuse or neglect

Confidentiality of records

Religious freedom

Communication with counsel and courts

Participation in treatment planning

Confidentiality

DMH must protect mental health records except where disclosure is:

Authorized by law

Required for treatment

Ordered by a court

Case Law

South Carolina Dep’t of Mental Health v. Hanna, 270 S.C. 210 (1978)
The court recognized that mental health records receive heightened confidentiality protections, but may be disclosed when a compelling legal interest exists.

4. Use of Restraints, Seclusion, and Emergency Measures

Chapter 87 tightly regulates:

When restraints or seclusion may be used

Duration and monitoring

Documentation and review

Medical necessity requirements

Regulatory standard

These measures are last resorts

Must be used only to prevent immediate harm

Never as punishment or convenience

Judicial Interpretation
South Carolina courts treat misuse of restraints as:

A potential civil rights violation

Evidence of negligence or abuse if not properly justified

Courts require:

Clear documentation

Professional judgment

Compliance with regulatory safeguards

5. Treatment Planning and Professional Standards

Chapter 87 requires:

Individualized treatment plans

Periodic review and updates

Multidisciplinary involvement

Treatment in the least restrictive environment

Least Restrictive Alternative

This is a core principle repeated throughout the regulations.

Case Law

In re Matthews (again)
The court emphasized that treatment decisions must consider whether less restrictive alternatives are available, especially when continued confinement is at issue.

6. Discharge, Transfer, and Aftercare

The regulations govern:

Discharge planning

Transfer between facilities

Coordination with community services

Continuity of care

Legal significance
Improper discharge can expose DMH to:

Negligence claims

Due process violations

Failure-to-protect allegations

Courts examine:

Whether discharge decisions followed regulatory standards

Whether foreseeable risks were reasonably addressed

7. Licensing, Facility Operations, and Oversight

Chapter 87 also addresses:

Facility standards

Staffing requirements

Recordkeeping

Internal review mechanisms

Judicial stance
Courts generally defer to DMH operational decisions unless:

Regulations are ignored

Rights are violated

Actions are arbitrary or discriminatory

8. Relationship Between Chapter 87 and Constitutional Law

South Carolina courts interpret Chapter 87 through the lens of:

Due Process (U.S. & S.C. Constitutions)

Equal Protection

Right to liberty and bodily integrity

Key legal rule
Mental illness alone does not justify confinement; compliance with both regulatory and constitutional standards is required.

9. Practical Legal Impact

Chapter 87 is commonly invoked in:

Involuntary commitment hearings

Habeas corpus petitions

Civil rights lawsuits

Medical negligence cases

Guardianship and competency disputes

Failure to comply can result in:

Release of patients

Suppression of evidence

Civil liability

Injunctions against DMH practices

10. Summary

Chapter 87 functions as the procedural backbone of South Carolina’s public mental health system, ensuring that:

Treatment is lawful, humane, and justified

Patient rights are protected

Professional discretion is balanced by accountability

South Carolina courts consistently enforce these regulations as mandatory safeguards, not optional guidelines.

LEAVE A COMMENT