Constitutional Law at Bosnia and Herzegovina
Constitutional Law in Bosnia and Herzegovina is governed by the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which was initially adopted in 1995 as part of the Dayton Agreement that ended the Bosnian War. The Constitution is unique because it was not solely created by Bosnia and Herzegovina’s political institutions, but rather by international actors as part of the peace process. It establishes a complex, decentralized system of governance and allocates powers among the country's entities and districts. Bosnia and Herzegovina is a federation made up of two entities: the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republika Srpska, and a Brčko District, which is self-governing.
Key Aspects of Constitutional Law in Bosnia and Herzegovina:
1. The Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina (1995)
The Constitution was part of the Dayton Peace Agreement (also known as the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina), signed in 1995. The Constitution was intended to provide the framework for the country’s post-war governance and structure.
The Constitution does not reflect a traditional state-building process but was created under international supervision to address the political complexities of post-conflict Bosnia and Herzegovina.
2. Core Principles of the Constitution
Federalism and Decentralization: Bosnia and Herzegovina is a federation consisting of two entities:
The Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FBiH): Comprised mainly of Bosniaks and Croats.
Republika Srpska (RS): Predominantly Serb.
Additionally, there is the Brčko District, which is a self-governing administrative unit directly under the sovereignty of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Power-Sharing: The Constitution aims to maintain a delicate ethnic power-sharing arrangement, ensuring that the three major ethnic groups in Bosnia and Herzegovina—Bosniaks, Croats, and Serbs—have political representation in the central government.
Multi-ethnic State: Bosnia and Herzegovina is established as a multi-ethnic state, and the Constitution mandates protection of the rights of ethnic minorities and vulnerable groups.
Republic with Parliamentary Democracy: Bosnia and Herzegovina is a democratic republic with a parliamentary system.
3. The Structure of Government
The Constitution establishes a tripartite presidency and a bicameral parliament, reflecting the country’s ethnic power-sharing arrangements.
The Presidency:
The Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina consists of three members, each elected to represent one of the major ethnic groups:
Bosniak member
Croat member
Serb member
The members of the presidency are elected by the citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina through direct popular elections.
The Chairman of the Presidency rotates among the three members every eight months.
The Presidency has broad executive authority but is collective in nature, meaning no single president can act independently of the others. It is responsible for directing foreign policy, defense, and other matters related to the functioning of the state.
The Council of Ministers (Executive Branch):
The Council of Ministers is the executive body of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is composed of a Chairman (Prime Minister) and ministers who are appointed by the Presidency, subject to approval by the Parliamentary Assembly.
The Council of Ministers is responsible for administration, defense, foreign affairs, economic policy, and implementing the country’s laws.
The Parliamentary Assembly (Legislative Branch):
The Parliamentary Assembly is bicameral and consists of two chambers:
The House of Peoples: The House of Peoples represents the constituent peoples (Bosniaks, Croats, and Serbs). It consists of 15 members, with an equal representation of the three groups, ensuring ethnic balance.
The House of Representatives: The House of Representatives has 42 members, elected through proportional representation from the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republika Srpska.
The Parliamentary Assembly is responsible for making laws, ratifying international agreements, and approving the budget. It also plays an important role in the election of members of the Council of Ministers.
4. The Judiciary
The Constitution guarantees an independent judiciary, but the courts are often seen as influenced by the ethnic politics and complex power-sharing arrangements.
The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina is the highest court in the country, and it has jurisdiction over matters involving the constitutionality of laws, inter-entity disputes, and certain cases of organized crime, war crimes, and terrorism.
The Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina is tasked with ensuring that laws and government actions comply with the Constitution. It is made up of nine judges, including international judges, to ensure impartiality.
5. Fundamental Rights and Freedoms
The Constitution guarantees a range of fundamental rights, including:
Equality before the law
Freedom of speech
Freedom of assembly
Freedom of religion
Freedom of movement
Right to property
Right to a fair trial
Political rights (such as the right to vote)
The Constitution also includes provisions for minority rights, ensuring that ethnic minorities are protected and represented in political life.
6. Complexities of Power-Sharing and Ethnic Representation
One of the most distinctive features of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s constitutional framework is the power-sharing system among the three main ethnic groups (Bosniaks, Croats, and Serbs). This system aims to ensure that each ethnic group is represented at the highest levels of government, but it has also created significant political gridlock and inefficiency.
The ethnic quotas are built into various levels of government, ensuring that each ethnic group has guaranteed representation, but critics argue that it often leads to ethnic-based political fragmentation and challenges in governance.
7. Entities and Regional Governments
Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina: One of the two entities within Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Federation is composed mainly of Bosniaks and Croats. The Federation has its own government, president, and assembly, with significant powers over areas like health, education, and local governance.
Republika Srpska: The other main entity is the Republika Srpska, which is predominantly Serb. Like the Federation, it has its own government, assembly, and president.
Brčko District: The Brčko District is a self-governing administrative unit that operates outside of the two entities. It was established by the Dayton Agreement and is governed by a District Assembly and a Mayor. It is unique because it is directly administered by the central government, making it a neutral zone in the ethnic divide.
8. Constitutional Amendments
The Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina can be amended, but the process is difficult. Amendments require the agreement of the entities and the Parliamentary Assembly.
Amendments and reforms are often challenging due to the ethnic and political divisions in the country. As a result, the Constitution has undergone only minor amendments since 1995, despite calls for reform to make the system more functional and efficient.
9. International Oversight
Bosnia and Herzegovina has experienced international oversight since the Dayton Agreement, and the Office of the High Representative (OHR) was established to monitor the implementation of the peace agreement and the Constitution.
The OHR can intervene in Bosnia and Herzegovina’s governance, including the ability to dismiss officials, impose laws, and overrule decisions if deemed necessary to maintain peace and political stability. The High Representative serves as an important international authority over Bosnia and Herzegovina's legal and constitutional system.
Conclusion
Constitutional Law in Bosnia and Herzegovina reflects the country’s complex political reality, shaped by its post-war reconstruction and the need to balance the interests of its three main ethnic groups: Bosniaks, Croats, and Serbs. The Constitution, created as part of the Dayton Peace Agreement, establishes a federal state with a power-sharing arrangement among the ethnic groups, creating a tripartite presidency, a bicameral parliament, and decentralized authority between the Federation and Republika Srpska. However, the system has been criticized for creating political gridlock and ethnic divisions, making governance challenging. Despite guarantees of fundamental rights, the political system often limits the country’s functional democracy due to the difficulty of reaching consensus in such a complex governance structure.
RELATED Blog
0 comments