Rules & Regulations of the State of Tennessee Title 1260 - Real Estate Commission

I. Statutory Authority and Purpose (Title 1260 – Generally)

Title 1260 implements and enforces Tennessee Code Annotated (T.C.A.) § 62-13-101 et seq., which governs real estate brokers, affiliate brokers, firms, timeshare agents, and related licensees.

Core Purposes

Protection of the public

Regulation of professional competence

Prevention of fraud, misrepresentation, and unethical conduct

Standardization of brokerage practices

Judicial Recognition

Tennessee courts consistently hold that real estate licensing laws are remedial, not punitive, and must be interpreted to protect the public rather than licensees.

Illustrative Principle:
In Lambdin v. Garland, 291 S.W.2d 610 (Tenn. 1956), the Tennessee Supreme Court emphasized that real estate regulation exists to protect consumers and that brokers must strictly comply with licensing statutes to recover commissions.

II. Licensing Requirements and Qualifications

A. Broker and Affiliate Broker Licensing

Title 1260 establishes:

Education prerequisites

Examination requirements

Experience thresholds (for brokers)

Moral character and trustworthiness standards

The Commission has discretion to deny licensure for:

Prior criminal conduct

Dishonesty or fraud

Acts demonstrating unfitness

Case Law Application

Tennessee courts defer to the Commission’s fact-based determination of fitness, so long as it is supported by substantial and material evidence.

Courts apply the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act (UAPA) standard:

No reweighing of evidence

No substitution of judicial judgment for agency expertise

Key Doctrine:
Administrative licensing decisions are upheld unless they are arbitrary, capricious, or unsupported by substantial evidence.

III. Scope of Practice and Unauthorized Brokerage Activity

Regulated Activities Include:

Listing property

Negotiating purchase or lease terms

Advertising real estate for others

Collecting commissions or referral fees

Prohibited Conduct:

Acting without a license

Paying commissions to unlicensed persons

Using misleading titles or advertisements

Case Law Principle

Tennessee courts strictly prohibit recovery of commissions by unlicensed individuals.

Established Rule:
A person acting as a broker without a license cannot enforce a commission agreement, even if services were fully performed (Lambdin v. Garland).

IV. Duties Owed to Clients and Customers

Title 1260 reinforces statutory duties imposed on licensees, including:

A. Fiduciary Duties (When Representing a Client)

Loyalty

Obedience to lawful instructions

Disclosure of material facts

Confidentiality

Accounting

Reasonable care and diligence

B. Duties to Customers (Non-Clients)

Honest dealing

Disclosure of known material defects

No misrepresentation or concealment

Case Law Guidance

Tennessee courts hold that material facts include any information that would affect a reasonable buyer’s decision, including latent defects and adverse property conditions.

Failure to disclose can result in:

License discipline

Civil liability

Commission forfeiture

V. Agency Relationships and Disclosure

Required Disclosures:

Agency confirmation

Dual agency consent

Designated agency notice

Failure to properly disclose agency status is a serious regulatory violation.

Judicial Interpretation

Courts treat agency disclosure failures as consumer protection violations, even absent actual fraud.

Key Principle:
Informed consent is essential; silence or technical compliance is insufficient if the consumer is misled.

VI. Advertising and Marketing Regulations

Title 1260 strictly regulates advertising to prevent consumer deception.

Requirements:

Broker name prominence

Accurate license status

No false or misleading claims

Firm responsibility for affiliate broker advertising

Violations Include:

“Coming soon” misuse

Unlicensed team branding

Misrepresentation of experience or listings

Case Law Standard

Tennessee courts defer to the Commission’s interpretation of advertising rules where consumer confusion is likely.

VII. Handling of Trust Funds and Escrow Accounts

Core Requirements:

Prompt deposit of earnest money

Proper escrow accounting

No commingling of funds

Accurate records

Seriousness of Violations

Misuse of trust funds is considered one of the most severe violations, often justifying license revocation.

Judicial View

Courts consistently uphold harsh discipline for escrow violations, even where:

No client suffered financial loss

Funds were eventually returned

Legal Rationale:
Public trust in the profession is paramount.

VIII. Disciplinary Authority and Sanctions

The Commission may impose:

License denial

Suspension

Revocation

Civil penalties

Mandatory education

Censure

Due Process Protections:

Notice of charges

Opportunity for hearing

Right to present evidence

Judicial review under UAPA

Case Law on Discipline

Tennessee courts recognize the Commission’s broad discretion in selecting sanctions, intervening only when punishment is grossly disproportionate or unlawful.

IX. Administrative Hearings and Judicial Review

Governing Law:

Tennessee Uniform Administrative Procedures Act

Standard of Review:

Courts may reverse agency decisions only if:

Constitutional rights were violated

Decision exceeded statutory authority

Procedure was unlawful

Decision lacked substantial evidence

Action was arbitrary or capricious

Key Holding:
Courts do not substitute their judgment for the Commission’s expertise in real estate regulation.

X. Recovery Fund (Real Estate Recovery Account)

Title 1260 governs claims against the Recovery Fund when consumers suffer losses due to a licensee’s misconduct.

Conditions:

Final civil judgment

Exhaustion of other remedies

Conduct occurred while properly licensed

Judicial Interpretation

Courts construe Recovery Fund eligibility strictly, as it involves public money.

XI. Overall Judicial Philosophy Toward Title 1260

Tennessee courts consistently apply the following principles:

Consumer protection overrides licensee convenience

Strict compliance with licensing laws is required

Administrative expertise is respected

Professional misconduct need not rise to criminal fraud to justify discipline

Conclusion

Title 1260 operates as a comprehensive regulatory framework designed to:

Maintain ethical real estate practices

Ensure transparency in transactions

Protect consumers from financial and informational harm

Tennessee case law reinforces the Commission’s authority and emphasizes that real estate licensure is a privilege, not a right, conditioned upon ongoing compliance with both the letter and spirit of the law.

LEAVE A COMMENT