Administrative Rules of Montana Department 38 - PUBLIC SERVICE REGULATION
I. Introduction — Department 38: Public Service Regulation
The Administrative Rules of Montana (ARM), Department 38 governs the Public Service Commission (PSC) and its regulatory authority over:
Public utilities (electricity, gas, water, sewer)
Railroads and motor carriers
Pipelines and related infrastructure
Tariff filings, rates, and service standards
Hearing and procedural rules before the PSC
Department 38 rules implement Montana statutes (Title 69 MCA) and provide a framework for:
Ensuring just and reasonable rates
Protecting consumer interests
Maintaining procedural fairness in PSC hearings
II. Key Concepts of Department 38
Organizational Authority
Defines the PSC’s structure, duties, and powers.
PSC acts as a quasi-judicial body regulating utilities and carriers.
Procedural Rules
ARM Chapter 2 outlines how hearings are conducted, evidence is submitted, and parties participate.
Ensures fair process and transparency.
Utility Regulation Standards
Utilities must submit rate cases with supporting data.
PSC evaluates to determine if rates are just, reasonable, and necessary.
Special Divisions
Includes rules for motor carriers, pipeline safety, and water utilities.
Certain federal safety standards are incorporated by reference.
Consumer Protection
Rules cover billing, service interruptions, and dispute resolution.
III. Case Law on Public Service Regulation
1. City of Helena v. Montana Dept. of Public Service Regulation (1981)
Facts:
Helena sought a rate increase including amortization of operating deficits.
PSC denied the increase related to past deficits.
Legal Issue:
Whether PSC correctly applied Department 38 rules and statutory authority in denying rates.
Judgment:
The Montana Supreme Court held PSC acted within its authority.
Decisions must be based on substantial evidence and regulatory standards.
Significance:
Confirmed PSC discretion in rate setting.
Established standard for judicial review of utility rates.
2. Mountain Water Co. v. Montana Dept. of Public Service Regulation (1992)
Facts:
Mountain Water challenged PSC decisions regarding rate filings and procedural compliance.
Legal Issue:
Whether PSC misapplied Department 38 rules in reviewing rate case submissions.
Judgment:
Court upheld PSC’s actions where they were supported by evidence.
Procedural challenges without merit do not overturn PSC decisions.
Significance:
Reinforced deferential review of PSC decisions.
Emphasized alignment of administrative rules with statutes.
3. Wilson v. Department of Public Service Regulation (1993)
Facts:
Plaintiffs alleged PSC violated procedural rules in a utility-related matter.
Legal Issue:
Whether PSC adhered to its own procedural rules and statutory authority.
Judgment:
Court stressed that PSC must act within Department 38 rules.
Procedural fairness and proper notice are required in administrative hearings.
Significance:
Demonstrated importance of due process in PSC actions.
Established precedent for challenging procedural irregularities.
4. Broad Reach Power LLC v. Public Service Commission (2022)
Facts:
Broad Reach Power challenged PSC rules defining participation rights in hearings.
Alleged PSC acted both as tribunal and participant.
Legal Issue:
Constitutional and procedural fairness of Department 38 rules for hearing participation.
Judgment:
Court examined due process concerns.
Highlighted that procedural rules must not compromise fairness.
Significance:
Reinforced constitutional limits on administrative procedures.
Confirmed judicial oversight of PSC rule implementation.
5. Noland v. State of Montana (Pending Case)
Facts:
Challenge to PSC regulation of motor carriers.
Dispute over certification and entry requirements.
Legal Issue:
Whether PSC rules under Department 38 unlawfully restrict business entry.
Significance:
Illustrates PSC authority beyond utilities.
Shows that transportation regulations are also subject to procedural scrutiny.
IV. Key Takeaways from Case Law
PSC decisions are reviewable for compliance with Department 38 and statutes.
PSC operates as a quasi-judicial body; fairness and evidence are crucial.
Utilities and carriers must comply with rate filing and procedural rules.
Courts defer to PSC discretion unless procedural errors or statutory violations occur.
Department 38 rules are applicable across utilities, carriers, pipelines, and consumer services.
V. Conclusion
The Administrative Rules of Montana, Department 38, provide a comprehensive framework for regulating utilities and carriers. Case law shows:
PSC has wide discretion in rate and regulatory matters.
Judicial review ensures fairness, due process, and adherence to statutes.
Department 38 rules guide procedure, evidence, hearings, and service standards, making PSC actions transparent and accountable.
RELATED Blog
comments