Article 312 of the Costitution of India with Case law

Article 312 of the Constitution of India

– All-India Services

📜 Text of Article 312:

(1) Notwithstanding anything in Chapter VI of Part VI, if the Council of States (Rajya Sabha) has declared by resolution supported by not less than two-thirds of the members present and voting that it is necessary or expedient in the national interest so to do, Parliament may by law provide for the creation of one or more All India Services (AIS) common to the Union and the States, including an All-India Judicial Service.

(2) The services known on the commencement of this Constitution as the Indian Administrative Service and the Indian Police Service shall be deemed to be services created by Parliament under this article.

(3) The all-India service law shall not affect the power of a State to regulate recruitment and conditions of service for State services.

(4) Parliament may by law regulate the conditions of service, including conduct, discipline, etc., for those appointed to All-India Services.

🧾 Essence of Article 312:

FeatureDetails
Authority to create AISParliament, after Rajya Sabha's special resolution
Requirement2/3rd majority of members present and voting in Rajya Sabha
PurposeIn the national interest
Existing AISIAS (Indian Administrative Service), IPS (Indian Police Service)
Proposed AISIndian Judicial Service (IJS), Indian Health Service (IHS), etc.

🏛️ Purpose of Article 312:

To ensure uniformity of standards and national integration in administration.

To provide expertise at both Central and State levels.

To facilitate inter-state coordination and uphold national policies.

⚖️ Important Case Laws Related to Article 312:

🧑‍⚖️ 1. Union of India v. S.L. Dutta (1991)

Citation: AIR 1991 SC 363

Issue: Challenge to recruitment process for All-India Services

Held: Parliament has wide discretion under Article 312 to regulate recruitment, conditions of service, and promotion of AIS officers. The procedure under Article 312 must be strictly followed.

🧑‍⚖️ 2. State of U.P. v. Rafiquddin (1987)

Citation: AIR 1987 SC 1659

Context: Regulation of promotion of officers from State Services to AIS

Held: State rules cannot override central AIS rules made under Article 312.

🧑‍⚖️ 3. T.R. Kothandaraman v. Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board (1994)

Citation: AIR 1994 SC 1582

Held: Differentiation between All-India Services and State Services is constitutionally valid, and rules made under Article 312 have primacy over State service rules.

⚙️ Process to Create a New All-India Service:

Rajya Sabha passes resolution (2/3rd majority of present & voting)

Resolution must state "national interest"

Parliament passes a law creating the new service

Rules & recruitment regulations are framed

🧪 Example: Proposal for All India Judicial Service (AIJS)

Objective: Standardized judicial recruitment across India

Status: Proposal pending; requires Rajya Sabha resolution + enabling law

Debate: States argue it may affect judicial independence and federalism

Key Takeaways:

ElementDetail
What it allowsCreation of All-India Services in national interest
Existing AISIAS, IPS, and IFS (Indian Forest Service - created in 1966)
New services possibleAIJS (Judicial), IHS (Health), etc.
Approval neededRajya Sabha + Parliament
Governing lawsAIS rules framed by the Centre under Article 312

🔄 Related Articles:

ArticleSubject
Article 310Doctrine of pleasure – service at the pleasure of the President/Governor
Article 311Protection in dismissal/removal of civil servants
Article 315-323Public Service Commissions (UPSC and State PSCs)

 

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments