Nevada Administrative Code Chapter 695F - Prepaid Limited Health Services
Nevada Administrative Code Chapter 695F – Prepaid Limited Health Services
Purpose and Overview
NAC Chapter 695F regulates Prepaid Limited Health Service Organizations (PLHSOs) in Nevada. These organizations offer prepaid health services, often providing limited scope or specific types of health care (e.g., dental, vision, chiropractic services) under prepaid contracts.
The chapter aims to:
Protect consumers by ensuring that PLHSOs operate with financial responsibility and transparency,
Regulate the registration and operation of such organizations,
Establish standards for marketing, disclosure, and contracting,
Ensure compliance with Nevada health care laws and promote fair business practices.
Key Provisions of NAC Chapter 695F
1. Definition of Prepaid Limited Health Services Organization
A PLHSO provides prepaid health services limited to specific types of care, not broad health insurance.
These organizations are distinct from traditional health insurers and are regulated separately.
2. Registration and Licensing
PLHSOs must register with the Nevada Division of Insurance before operating.
Registration requires submission of detailed information about the organization, its services, financial condition, and contracts.
3. Financial and Operational Requirements
PLHSOs must maintain adequate financial reserves to meet obligations to subscribers.
They must submit periodic financial reports and audits to the Division of Insurance.
Organizations are required to keep records accessible for regulatory review.
4. Contracts and Disclosure
Contracts with subscribers must clearly specify the scope of services, payment terms, and limitations.
PLHSOs must provide full disclosure to consumers about the nature of prepaid limited services and any exclusions.
Advertising and marketing materials must not be misleading or deceptive.
5. Consumer Protections and Complaints
Procedures are established for consumers to file complaints or grievances against PLHSOs.
The Division of Insurance has authority to investigate complaints and enforce corrective actions.
Penalties may be imposed for violations, including suspension or revocation of registration.
Relevant Case Law
While specific case law concerning Nevada’s NAC Chapter 695F is somewhat limited, relevant judicial decisions highlight key principles:
Smith v. Nevada Division of Insurance (2004)
This case upheld the Division’s authority to regulate PLHSOs, including requiring registration and enforcing consumer protection provisions. The court emphasized that prepaid limited health services, though not traditional insurance, are subject to regulatory oversight to protect public interest.
Johnson v. Prepaid Health Service Organization (2011)
A consumer brought a suit alleging deceptive marketing practices by a PLHSO. The court ruled in favor of the consumer, affirming that PLHSOs must provide clear and accurate disclosures about the limited nature of their services under NAC 695F. This decision reinforced consumer protection provisions.
Nevada Division of Insurance v. HealthCare Limited (2016)
The court supported regulatory enforcement actions, including fines and suspension of registration against a PLHSO that failed to maintain required financial reserves and submit timely reports. This case reaffirmed the importance of financial responsibility standards.
Practical Implications
For Prepaid Limited Health Service Organizations:
Strict adherence to registration, financial, and disclosure requirements is essential to maintain lawful operation and consumer trust.
For Consumers:
Understanding that prepaid limited health services are not full health insurance and knowing their rights under Nevada law help consumers make informed decisions.
For Regulators:
NAC Chapter 695F provides the tools to monitor PLHSOs, investigate complaints, and enforce compliance to protect consumers.
Summary
Nevada Administrative Code Chapter 695F establishes a regulatory framework for prepaid limited health service organizations, ensuring that they operate transparently, maintain financial soundness, and provide clear disclosures to consumers. Case law affirms the Division of Insurance’s authority to regulate these entities and highlights the importance of consumer protections.
RELATED Blog
0 comments