Administrative Rules of Montana Department 17 - ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
📌 Background: Montana Administrative Rules – Department 17: Environmental Quality
Department 17 establishes rules related to:
Air and water quality standards – Regulates pollutants, emissions, and effluent discharges.
Waste management – Includes hazardous and non-hazardous waste handling, storage, and disposal.
Permitting and compliance – Licensing for facilities, inspections, and adherence to environmental standards.
Enforcement and penalties – Investigations, fines, remediation orders, and closure requirements.
Public health and safety – Ensuring activities do not harm humans, wildlife, or ecosystems.
🧑⚖️ Case 1: Unauthorized Discharge into Waterways
Situation
A manufacturing facility discharged wastewater into a nearby river without a valid permit.
Relevant Rules
ARM 17.30.120 et seq. regulates discharges of pollutants into surface waters and requires permits.
Issue
Discharge could harm aquatic life and violate water quality standards.
Outcome
DEQ issued a cease-and-desist order and required the company to treat and remove pollutants.
The facility paid fines for violations and obtained the required permit before resuming operations.
Lesson: Facilities must have proper permits before discharging pollutants; violations result in fines and corrective actions.
🧑⚖️ Case 2: Improper Hazardous Waste Storage
Situation
A business was storing hazardous chemicals without proper containment in violation of state rules.
Relevant Rules
ARM 17.50.101 et seq. governs hazardous waste storage, labeling, and handling.
Issue
Improper storage posed risks of fire, leaks, or environmental contamination.
Outcome
DEQ inspectors issued an administrative order to remove and properly store the waste.
Business paid penalties and implemented new hazardous waste management procedures.
Lesson: Hazardous waste must be stored according to regulatory standards to protect public health and the environment.
🧑⚖️ Case 3: Air Quality Violations
Situation
A cement plant exceeded allowable particulate emissions limits set by state air quality standards.
Relevant Rules
ARM 17.8.101 et seq. sets ambient air quality standards and limits on pollutants from industrial facilities.
Issue
Excess emissions could affect public health and visibility.
Outcome
Facility was required to install emission control technology.
Fines were imposed for violations, and the plant underwent quarterly air quality monitoring.
Lesson: Industrial facilities must adhere to emission limits; failure to comply triggers fines and corrective actions.
🧑⚖️ Case 4: Illegal Landfill Operations
Situation
An unpermitted landfill was discovered accepting construction debris and household waste.
Relevant Rules
ARM 17.50.201 et seq. regulates solid waste management and landfill operations.
Issue
Operating a landfill without a permit violates environmental protection laws and risks soil and water contamination.
Outcome
DEQ ordered immediate closure of the landfill.
Owners were required to remove and properly dispose of the waste and implement site remediation.
Heavy fines were levied to ensure compliance.
Lesson: All landfills must be permitted and managed according to state regulations.
🧑⚖️ Case 5: Noncompliance with Environmental Permits
Situation
A mining operation failed to comply with conditions in its surface water and sediment control permit, leading to sediment runoff into nearby streams.
Relevant Rules
ARM 17.24.101 et seq. governs mine permits and environmental protection measures.
Issue
Permit conditions are legally binding; noncompliance can damage ecosystems and violate law.
Outcome
DEQ issued a notice of violation requiring immediate remediation.
Mining company implemented additional sediment control measures and paid fines.
Continued noncompliance could result in permit revocation.
Lesson: Permit holders must strictly follow permit conditions; violations carry enforcement actions and remediation requirements.
🧑⚖️ Case 6: Contaminated Site Cleanup Failure
Situation
A chemical manufacturer abandoned a site with residual toxic chemicals, failing to remediate soil contamination.
Relevant Rules
ARM 17.50.301 et seq. sets procedures for environmental cleanup and remediation of contaminated sites.
Issue
Failure to remediate posed long-term risks to public health and groundwater quality.
Outcome
DEQ ordered immediate cleanup and testing.
Company was required to fund soil remediation and groundwater monitoring.
Penalties and ongoing oversight were applied until the site met environmental standards.
Lesson: Contaminated sites must be properly remediated to prevent environmental and health risks.
🔑 Key Themes from Montana Administrative Rules – Environmental Quality
Permit Compliance – Discharges, waste management, and operations must comply with state permits.
Pollution Control – Air, water, and soil quality standards are enforced strictly.
Hazardous Waste Management – Proper labeling, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials are mandatory.
Enforcement and Penalties – Noncompliance results in fines, remediation orders, and possible cessation of operations.
Public and Environmental Safety – Rules prioritize the protection of humans, wildlife, and natural resources.
Remediation and Corrective Action – Facilities must correct violations and restore affected sites.
RELATED Blog
comments