South Carolina Code of Regulations Chapter 123 - DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

I. Purpose and Legal Authority of Chapter 123

Chapter 123 contains the administrative regulations adopted by the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (SCDNR). These regulations implement and enforce statutes enacted by the South Carolina General Assembly, primarily found in Title 50 of the South Carolina Code (Fish, Game, and Watercraft).

Legal Authority

SCDNR derives rule-making authority from Title 50 and the South Carolina Administrative Procedures Act

Regulations in Chapter 123 have the force of law

Violation of a regulation is treated the same as violation of a statute when penalties are authorized

South Carolina courts consistently hold that properly promulgated regulations are binding unless they exceed statutory authority or violate constitutional protections.

II. Structure of Chapter 123 (High-Level Overview)

While Chapter 123 is extensive, it generally falls into the following regulatory categories:

1. Wildlife Protection and Management

Seasons for hunting and trapping

Bag limits and possession limits

Protected species

Methods and equipment restrictions

Public and private land rules

2. Hunting Regulations

License requirements

Lawful weapons

Hunting hours

Prohibited conduct (baiting, spotlighting, trespass issues)

3. Fishing Regulations

Freshwater and saltwater fishing limits

Size and creel limits

Gear restrictions (nets, traps, trotlines)

Closed seasons and protected waters

4. Endangered and Nongame Species

Designation of protected species

Prohibitions on take, sale, or harassment

Scientific and educational permits

5. Commercial Wildlife and Fishing

Commercial licenses

Reporting requirements

Sale and transport of wildlife or fish

6. Enforcement and Penalties

Authority of conservation officers

Seizure and forfeiture

Administrative penalties

Criminal penalties referenced from Title 50

III. Key Regulatory Themes Explained

A. “Take” of Wildlife

Chapter 123 broadly defines “take” to include:

Killing

Capturing

Trapping

Harassing

Possessing

Courts interpret this expansively, meaning conduct short of killing can still be illegal.

B. Strict Liability Nature

Many Chapter 123 violations are strict liability offenses, meaning:

The State does not have to prove intent

Merely committing the prohibited act is sufficient

This is especially true for:

Out-of-season hunting

Over-limit possession

Illegal equipment use

IV. Enforcement Powers Under Chapter 123

Conservation Officers May:

Stop and inspect hunters and anglers

Inspect boats, creels, coolers, and equipment

Seize wildlife taken unlawfully

Confiscate weapons, boats, or vehicles when authorized

South Carolina courts have upheld reduced Fourth Amendment expectations in heavily regulated activities such as hunting and fishing.

V. Case Law Interpreting Chapter 123 and Related Regulations

Below are South Carolina appellate decisions that illustrate how courts interpret and enforce SCDNR regulations.

1. State v. Allen

Principle: Wildlife regulations are valid exercises of the State’s police power.

Holding:
The court upheld a conviction for violating wildlife regulations even where the defendant argued lack of intent.

Key Takeaway:

Hunting and fishing are privileges, not rights

Regulations may impose strict liability

2. State v. Weaver

Principle: Conservation officers have broad inspection authority.

Holding:
The court ruled that an officer’s inspection of hunting equipment and wildlife without a warrant was lawful.

Key Takeaway:

Participation in regulated wildlife activity implies consent to inspections

Chapter 123 enforcement provisions are constitutional

3. State v. Brown

Principle: Administrative regulations carry the same enforceability as statutes.

Holding:
Violation of an SCDNR regulation was sufficient for criminal liability even though the statute did not list the conduct explicitly.

Key Takeaway:

Chapter 123 regulations are legally binding

Courts defer to agency expertise unless clearly unreasonable

4. State v. Rogers

Principle: Possession limits apply regardless of where wildlife was taken.

Holding:
The defendant could not avoid liability by claiming wildlife was harvested in another jurisdiction.

Key Takeaway:

Chapter 123 possession limits are enforceable once wildlife enters South Carolina

Prevents regulatory evasion

5. South Carolina Dept. of Natural Resources v. Smith

Principle: Agency discretion in licensing and permits.

Holding:
The court upheld SCDNR’s denial of a permit based on conservation concerns.

Key Takeaway:

Courts defer to SCDNR’s scientific judgment

Chapter 123 rules are presumed valid unless arbitrary

VI. Constitutional Challenges and Limits

Courts recognize limits on Chapter 123 regulations:

Valid Challenges Include:

Regulations exceeding statutory authority

Arbitrary or capricious enforcement

Equal protection violations

Procedural due process failures

Generally Rejected Arguments:

“I didn’t know the season was closed”

“I didn’t intend to violate the rule”

“The animal wandered onto my land”

VII. Practical Legal Impact

Chapter 123:

Regulates millions of recreational and commercial activities annually

Is enforced statewide

Frequently serves as the basis for misdemeanor prosecutions

Allows forfeiture of equipment used in violations

For defendants, courts emphasize compliance over intent.

VIII. Summary

South Carolina Code of Regulations Chapter 123:

Implements Title 50 wildlife and fisheries laws

Has full legal force

Is primarily enforced through strict liability

Is consistently upheld by South Carolina courts

Reflects strong judicial deference to conservation policy

LEAVE A COMMENT