Nebraska Administrative Code Topic - ABSTRACTERS BOARD OF EXAMINERS
I. Overview of Nebraska Administrative Code – Abstracters Board of Examiners
The Nebraska Abstracters Board of Examiners (NABE) regulates the title industry in Nebraska, ensuring that abstracters and title companies operate according to statutory and administrative rules.
Primary Functions:
Licensing:
Examines and licenses abstracters and title agents.
Requires continuing education and compliance with ethical standards.
Standards & Compliance:
Sets professional and operational standards for abstracting services.
Requires accurate recordkeeping, secure handling of title records, and timely reporting.
Enforcement:
Investigates complaints regarding misconduct or mismanagement.
Issues fines, license suspension, or revocation for violations.
Examinations & Appeals:
Administers exams for new license applicants.
Provides administrative review or hearing for contested license denials or disciplinary actions.
II. Illustrative Administrative Cases / Disputes
Here are six detailed examples illustrating how NAC and NABE rules are applied:
Case 1: License Denial – Incomplete Application
Background:
An applicant submitted a license application to act as an abstractor but failed to provide required employment verification and examination fees.
Administrative Action:
NABE denied the application.
Applicant requested an administrative hearing.
Outcome:
Hearing officer upheld the denial, citing clear regulatory requirements for completeness and documentation.
Applicant was allowed to reapply once all materials were submitted.
Significance:
Demonstrates NABE’s administrative authority to enforce licensing requirements.
Shows procedural fairness through administrative hearing.
Case 2: Exam Failure – Retaking the Licensing Test
Background:
An applicant failed the Nebraska abstracters examination twice and requested reconsideration.
Administrative Action:
NABE requires a waiting period and additional training before retake.
Applicant appealed, claiming the exam was improperly graded.
Outcome:
Review confirmed proper grading; applicant retook exam after mandated training and eventually passed.
Significance:
Illustrates NABE’s authority to set examination standards and retake policies.
Demonstrates administrative processes for dispute resolution.
Case 3: Misuse of Title Records – License Suspension
Background:
A licensed abstractor was found to have improperly shared sensitive title records with an unauthorized third party.
Administrative Action:
NABE conducted an investigation.
Administrative order issued for license suspension and mandatory ethics training.
Outcome:
Abstractor completed corrective training; license reinstated after six months.
NABE required updated internal recordkeeping policies.
Significance:
Highlights NABE enforcement powers to protect client confidentiality and maintain professional standards.
Case 4: Failure to Maintain Required Records – Administrative Fine
Background:
A title company failed to maintain complete and accurate abstracts for multiple transactions over a year.
Administrative Action:
NABE issued a notice of violation.
Administrative hearing allowed the company to explain mitigation factors.
Outcome:
Fine imposed for noncompliance; company required to implement a compliance tracking system.
Continued oversight ensured adherence to NAC recordkeeping requirements.
Significance:
Demonstrates administrative sanctions for operational violations.
Shows NABE’s focus on record accuracy and professional accountability.
Case 5: Disciplinary Action for Ethical Violations
Background:
An abstractor accepted compensation from multiple parties in a transaction without disclosure, violating ethical rules.
Administrative Action:
NABE investigated the complaint and held a formal hearing.
Abstractor contested the allegations but provided partial documentation.
Outcome:
NABE issued a reprimand, imposed a small fine, and required ethics retraining.
License retained under conditions of monitoring.
Significance:
Illustrates enforcement of ethical standards and NABE’s administrative authority.
Shows balancing of disciplinary action with opportunity for corrective measures.
Case 6: Complaint Regarding Continuing Education Compliance
Background:
An abstractor failed to submit proof of continuing education hours required for license renewal.
Administrative Action:
NABE notified the licensee and scheduled a hearing to determine compliance.
Outcome:
License renewal temporarily denied.
After submitting verification of completed courses, license was reinstated.
Significance:
Highlights NABE’s authority over continuing education requirements.
Demonstrates administrative mechanisms to ensure professional development.
III. Key Takeaways
Administrative Enforcement Dominates:
NABE cases are almost entirely resolved through administrative processes rather than courts.
Focus Areas:
Licensing, examination, recordkeeping, ethics, continuing education.
Enforcement Tools:
License denial, suspension, revocation, fines, and corrective training.
Procedural Fairness:
Administrative hearings allow licensees to contest decisions.
NABE provides remedies while maintaining professional standards.
Professional Standards Enforcement:
NABE ensures abstracters handle sensitive records appropriately and maintain compliance with NAC regulations.
RELATED Blog
comments