North Dakota Administrative Code Title 65 - Potato Council
North Dakota Administrative Code (NDAC)
Title 65 — Potato Council
Overview
Title 65 of the North Dakota Administrative Code pertains to the North Dakota Potato Council, a state agency created to support and regulate the potato industry in North Dakota. The Potato Council’s mission includes promoting potato production, marketing, research, and education to benefit growers and the state's economy.
Title 65 outlines the administrative rules governing:
Formation and operation of the Potato Council
Funding mechanisms including assessments or check-offs on potato sales
Powers and duties of the Council
Procedures for meetings and elections of council members
Reporting, budgeting, and use of funds
Enforcement and penalties for violations of rules
Key Provisions of NDAC Title 65
1. Creation and Authority
The North Dakota Potato Council is established under state statute, empowered to regulate aspects of the potato industry.
The Council acts as a quasi-governmental body with authority delegated by the legislature.
It functions to promote research, marketing programs, and quality standards.
2. Funding and Assessments
The Council is funded primarily through mandatory assessments or "check-off" fees collected from potato producers and handlers based on the volume of potatoes sold or handled.
Title 65 details how assessments are calculated, collected, and used.
The funds support promotional campaigns, research projects, and administrative costs.
3. Council Membership and Governance
Procedures for selecting council members (often elected by growers or appointed) are established.
Rules govern terms of office, duties, removal procedures, and conflict-of-interest policies.
The Council conducts meetings according to administrative rules ensuring transparency and public participation.
4. Programs and Activities
The Council administers research grants, marketing initiatives (including advertising), and educational outreach to improve the potato industry.
Rules establish guidelines for approving projects, contracting vendors, and reporting outcomes.
5. Enforcement and Penalties
Title 65 provides enforcement authority to ensure compliance with assessment payments and Council rules.
Penalties can include fines or other sanctions for failure to comply with the assessment or reporting requirements.
Appeals and hearing procedures are specified to ensure due process.
Relevant Legal Principles and Case Law
While case law specifically involving the North Dakota Potato Council is limited, general principles from cases involving agricultural commodity councils, marketing boards, or similar entities provide useful guidance:
1. Authority of Agricultural Councils and Check-Off Programs
Courts generally uphold the legislative delegation of authority to commodity councils to impose assessments on producers to fund collective marketing and research.
Such programs are considered a form of governmental regulation or state action supporting agricultural industries.
As long as assessments are imposed under statutory authority and follow due process, courts defer to the council’s authority.
2. Due Process in Assessments and Penalties
Producers subject to assessments or penalties must be given adequate notice and opportunity to contest charges.
Courts emphasize procedural fairness, requiring that councils provide hearings before imposing sanctions.
Administrative rules under Title 65 typically include such procedural protections.
3. First Amendment Considerations
Some cases involving check-off programs for agricultural commodities have addressed First Amendment issues, such as compelled speech or funding of promotional messages.
Courts have generally allowed mandatory assessments when funds are used for government speech or non-ideological commercial promotion, but not for political or ideological advocacy.
If challenged, courts balance producer rights with state interests in agricultural promotion.
4. Contractual and Fiduciary Duties
The Potato Council, as a steward of public funds collected from producers, owes fiduciary duties regarding the use of funds.
Mismanagement or diversion of funds can lead to legal challenges.
Producers may demand transparency and accountability through administrative or judicial means.
Hypothetical Case Illustration
Suppose a potato producer in North Dakota refuses to pay the mandatory assessment established by the Potato Council under Title 65. The Council initiates an enforcement proceeding and levies a fine. The producer appeals, claiming the assessment is unlawful or that the Council failed to provide proper notice.
A court reviewing the case would verify:
Whether the Potato Council has statutory authority under state law to impose assessments
Whether Title 65 procedures were followed, including notice and hearing rights
Whether the assessment serves a legitimate government interest in supporting the industry
If the Council complied with all procedural and substantive requirements, the court would likely uphold the assessment and fine.
Summary Table
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Governing Authority | NDAC Title 65; state statutes creating the Potato Council |
| Purpose | Promote potato industry via research, marketing, education |
| Funding | Mandatory assessments ("check-offs") on potato sales |
| Governance | Elected or appointed council members with rules for operation |
| Legal Issues | Authority to impose assessments; due process protections; First Amendment concerns |
| Enforcement | Penalties for non-compliance with assessments and rules |
RELATED Blog
0 comments