South Carolina Code of Regulations Chapter 72 - DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL-LAND RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION DISTRICTS DIVISION
South Carolina Code of Regulations Chapter 72
Department of Health and Environmental Control – Land Resources and Conservation Districts Division
– Detailed Explanation with Case Law Themes (No External Law Referenced)
I. Overview and Purpose
The Land Resources and Conservation Districts Division is a subdivision of the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC). Its main function is to manage and protect the state’s land, soil, and water resources through coordinated conservation efforts.
This regulatory chapter outlines how land use, conservation, erosion control, and cooperation with local Conservation Districts are managed in South Carolina. These efforts help promote:
Sustainable land management
Soil conservation
Erosion prevention
Natural resource protection
II. Key Functions and Regulatory Areas
1. Conservation District Oversight
South Carolina is divided into local conservation districts that implement land and water conservation programs at the county or regional level.
The Division supports, supervises, and coordinates these districts.
2. Soil and Water Conservation Programs
Develops technical and educational programs for landowners to prevent soil erosion, protect water quality, and improve agricultural sustainability.
3. Land Use and Erosion Control Permitting
Issues permits and enforces compliance for projects involving land disturbance, grading, mining, or construction that might impact soil stability or runoff.
4. Interagency Coordination
Works with federal, state, and local agencies to implement best management practices (BMPs) in conservation and land use.
5. Public Engagement and Education
Promotes awareness and provides technical guidance to landowners, developers, and public bodies on conservation practices.
III. Key Administrative Law Principles
⚖️ Delegated Authority
The Division acts under authority delegated by the executive branch to regulate land conservation and enforce standards through rulemaking, permitting, and enforcement.
⚖️ Environmental Stewardship and Public Interest
Regulatory actions are justified by the public interest in preserving soil, water, and land resources for future generations.
⚖️ Procedural Due Process
Affected individuals or developers must be given proper notice, an opportunity to respond, and sometimes a hearing when facing denials, fines, or enforcement actions.
⚖️ Scientific and Technical Deference
Courts often defer to the agency's expertise in land science and conservation when regulations or enforcement actions are challenged.
IV. Case Law Themes (Illustrative Scenarios)
📌 Case Theme 1: Land Disturbance Without a Permit
Issue: A developer begins grading land for a commercial project without securing the necessary conservation permit.
Division Action: Issues a stop-work order and fine.
Developer's Response: Claims the land disturbance is minor and doesn’t require a permit.
Court’s Analysis: Determines whether the disturbance exceeds threshold levels and whether the agency followed proper enforcement procedures.
Key Principle: Courts typically uphold enforcement actions if the Division acts within its authority and provides adequate procedural protections.
📌 Case Theme 2: Erosion Control Requirements
Issue: A landowner challenges the requirement to install erosion control fencing, claiming it’s unnecessary.
Division Action: Mandates the measure under BMPs to prevent sediment runoff into nearby streams.
Court’s View: Defers to the agency’s technical judgment about environmental risks.
Key Principle: Agencies have discretion to require preventative measures if based on scientific risk assessments.
📌 Case Theme 3: Dispute over Conservation District Boundaries
Issue: Two counties dispute jurisdiction over a tract of land within overlapping conservation districts.
Division Role: Arbitrates based on established district boundaries and conservation plans.
Judicial Review: Courts support the Division’s decision if it is based on clear records and consistent application of regulatory standards.
📌 Case Theme 4: Appeal of Permit Denial
Issue: A farming operation is denied a land use permit due to proximity to protected wetlands.
Farmer’s Argument: Claims the project will not negatively impact the area.
Commission’s Response: Cites erosion risk and pollution potential.
Court’s Role: Reviews whether the denial is supported by substantial evidence and made through fair procedure.
Key Principle: Permit denials must be factually and procedurally justified.
V. Hypothetical Example
Scenario:
A housing developer begins clearing a wooded area for construction. The Division investigates and determines that the area is prone to erosion and within a conservation zone. The developer did not apply for the proper land disturbance permit.
Agency Response:
Issues a cease-and-desist order.
Requires restoration of damaged areas and payment of civil penalties.
Developer appeals the action.
Judicial Outcome:
The court upholds the agency’s decision after finding that:
The regulations clearly required a permit;
The land is within a designated conservation zone;
The agency provided adequate notice and opportunity to respond.
VI. Summary Table
| Regulatory Area | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Conservation District Support | Coordinates and supervises local land conservation efforts |
| Erosion Control Enforcement | Issues rules and permits for land disturbance and runoff control |
| Technical Guidance | Offers expertise to landowners and developers |
| Permit Compliance | Enforces permitting processes for environmentally sensitive projects |
| Administrative Hearings | Provides appeal processes for adverse permitting or enforcement actions |
| Environmental Protection | Prioritizes public interest in soil, water, and land sustainability |
VII. Conclusion
The South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control’s Land Resources and Conservation Districts Division, through Chapter 72 regulations, ensures responsible land use and conservation through a comprehensive framework of permitting, compliance, and public engagement. It balances development needs with the long-term protection of soil and water resources.
When disputes arise, courts often defer to the agency’s technical expertise, provided that decisions are made fairly, based on evidence, and within the agency’s authority.
RELATED Blog
0 comments