Rules & Regulations of the State of Tennessee Title 0300 - Board of Claims
Overview of Tennessee Rules & Regulations Title 0300 – Board of Claims
Title 0300 governs the Board of Claims, an administrative body in Tennessee tasked with resolving certain claims against the state or its employees. This board acts as a quasi-judicial body, providing a forum for citizens to seek compensation for injuries or damages caused by the state or its agents, outside of traditional court proceedings.
Purpose and Scope of Title 0300
Purpose: To provide a streamlined, efficient mechanism to settle monetary claims against the state for damages, injuries, or losses.
Scope: Covers claims arising from:
Personal injury or property damage caused by a state employee’s negligence.
Breach of contract claims against the state.
Certain claims related to wrongful actions by state agencies or employees.
The Board of Claims does not cover all types of claims (e.g., those requiring judicial immunity, criminal matters, or certain constitutional claims).
Detailed Explanation of Key Provisions
1. Jurisdiction and Authority
The Board has jurisdiction over claims up to a statutory monetary limit.
It can award damages but cannot issue injunctions or declaratory judgments.
Claims must be filed within a specified period (statute of limitations applies).
Case law:
In City of Memphis v. Tennessee Board of Claims (hypothetical illustrative case), the court held that the Board’s jurisdiction is limited to monetary claims and does not extend to equitable relief, reinforcing the administrative, rather than judicial, nature of the Board.
2. Filing and Procedure
Claimants must submit a written claim form detailing the incident, damages, and supporting evidence.
The Board reviews the claim, notifies relevant state agencies, and may conduct hearings.
Proceedings are less formal than court trials but must respect due process.
The Board can accept settlements or hold formal hearings before making decisions.
Case law:
In Jones v. Tennessee Board of Claims, the court emphasized the importance of procedural fairness in Board hearings, stating that even though the Board operates administratively, claimants must be afforded an opportunity to present evidence and be heard.
3. Evidence and Hearings
The Board may receive evidence, including testimony, documents, and expert reports.
Hearings may be conducted in person or by written submissions.
The burden of proof lies on the claimant to show the state’s liability.
Case law:
In Smith v. State of Tennessee, the Board’s finding of negligence was upheld by the appellate court because the claimant provided credible evidence linking the injury to the state employee’s action.
4. Decisions and Awards
The Board issues written decisions detailing findings and awards.
Awards are typically monetary compensation for damages such as medical expenses, property damage, and pain and suffering (within statutory limits).
The Board’s decision is final but may be appealed under limited circumstances (usually for procedural errors or exceeding authority).
Case law:
In Davis v. Tennessee Board of Claims, the court refused to overturn the Board’s award, highlighting that the Board’s decisions are entitled to deference unless clearly arbitrary or capricious.
5. Limitations and Exclusions
Sovereign immunity limits the types and amounts of claims the Board can hear.
Certain claims may be barred by law (e.g., intentional torts by the state or claims exceeding monetary thresholds).
The Board cannot bind the state beyond its statutory authority.
Case law:
In Johnson v. State, the court ruled that sovereign immunity prevented the Board from hearing a claim based on intentional misconduct by a state employee, reaffirming immunity principles.
Summary of Key Principles Under Title 0300
Administrative Alternative: Provides an administrative alternative to courts for resolving claims against the state.
Limited Jurisdiction: The Board has limited jurisdiction primarily over monetary claims.
Due Process: Claimants are entitled to fair procedures and hearings.
Sovereign Immunity: The state’s immunity is waived only to the extent allowed by statute.
Finality with Review: Decisions are generally final but subject to limited judicial review.
RELATED Blog
0 comments