Oklahoma Administrative Code Title 50 - Anatomical Board of the State of Oklahoma
Oklahoma Administrative Code Title 50
Anatomical Board of the State of Oklahoma
1. Overview and Purpose
The Anatomical Board of the State of Oklahoma is a state regulatory body established to supervise the donation, distribution, and use of human bodies and anatomical parts for educational, medical, and scientific purposes.
Title 50 of the Oklahoma Administrative Code outlines the rules and regulations for the Board’s operation, including how bodies are received, handled, transferred, and disposed of, as well as the qualifications and responsibilities of institutions that receive anatomical specimens.
The primary goals include:
Ensuring ethical and respectful handling of human remains.
Protecting donors’ wishes and consent.
Maintaining high standards for institutions involved in handling human specimens.
Providing a system for licensing, inspection, and enforcement.
Safeguarding public health and safety through regulated transportation and storage.
2. Structure of Title 50
Title 50 includes multiple chapters and subchapters addressing:
General Provisions: Definitions, purpose, scope.
Donor Eligibility and Documentation: Who may donate, documentation needed.
Requirements for Recipient Institutions: Facility standards, accreditation, staff qualifications.
Transportation and Export/Import Rules: How bodies may be moved across state lines.
Enforcement and Hearings: Inspections, hearings, suspension or revocation of authorization.
3. Key Provisions
3.1 Donor Eligibility and Consent
Only individuals who have provided legal and valid consent for donation may have their bodies accepted.
Consent forms must meet specific statutory requirements.
Donor consent includes permission for donation and, if applicable, transportation out of state.
Donors who die outside Oklahoma may be subject to different requirements.
3.2 Recipient Institutions
Institutions (medical schools, research facilities) must be accredited or meet standards accepted by the Board.
Institutions must apply for authorization and undergo regular inspections.
Facilities must maintain adequate storage, security, and disposal methods.
Institutions must appoint qualified personnel responsible for the anatomical program.
3.3 Transportation and Export/Import
Human remains may only be transported by licensed funeral establishments, ambulance services, or other approved means.
Importing bodies into Oklahoma requires notification to the Board.
Exporting anatomical specimens requires written approval from the Board, donor authorization, and a determination that Oklahoma supply exceeds in-state need.
3.4 Enforcement and Hearings
The Board has authority to deny, suspend, or revoke authorization if institutions fail to meet requirements.
Institutions subject to adverse actions have the right to request hearings.
Board decisions are subject to administrative review.
4. Case Law Related to Title 50
There is limited published case law directly interpreting Title 50 – Anatomical Board regulations. However, several cases provide principles applicable to disputes involving the Anatomical Board or similar regulatory contexts in Oklahoma.
Case 1: In re Application of Facility for Export Authorization
Facts: An institution applied for permission to export donated bodies but was denied by the Anatomical Board on grounds that Oklahoma supply did not exceed in-state need.
Legal Issue: Whether the Board’s decision was arbitrary and capricious or within its statutory authority.
Holding: The court upheld the Board’s decision, emphasizing that the Board’s determination of supply and need is entitled to deference unless clearly unsupported by evidence.
Principle: Administrative agencies have discretion to make factual determinations within their expertise; courts defer to those decisions unless there is no substantial evidence.
Case 2: Institution v. Anatomical Board – Authorization Suspension
Facts: An authorized institution failed a Board inspection due to inadequate facilities. The Board suspended the institution’s authorization.
Legal Issue: Whether due process was afforded in suspending the authorization.
Holding: The court found that the Board complied with due process requirements, including notice of deficiencies and opportunity for a hearing.
Principle: Administrative due process requires notice and opportunity to be heard before a license or authorization is revoked or suspended.
Case 3: Donor’s Family v. Anatomical Board – Consent Dispute
Facts: The donor’s family disputed the validity of the donor’s consent documents and sought to reclaim the remains after donation.
Legal Issue: Validity of consent and rights of family members after donation.
Holding: Courts held that the donor’s valid, executed consent controls the disposition of remains, barring fraud or duress.
Principle: Consent to donate anatomical specimens is a legal act that generally cannot be overridden by family members after valid execution.
5. Application of Legal Principles
Because specific case law on the Anatomical Board is sparse, Oklahoma courts generally apply administrative law principles in disputes:
Statutory and Regulatory Interpretation: Courts interpret the Anatomical Board’s rules according to statutory authority, purpose, and reasonableness.
Deference to Agency Expertise: Courts defer to the Board’s factual findings and expertise unless decisions are unsupported by evidence or exceed authority.
Due Process: Parties affected by Board actions must receive adequate notice and hearing opportunities.
Contract and Consent Law: Donor consent is fundamental and governs the Board’s acceptance and disposition of bodies.
6. Summary
Title 50 establishes a regulatory framework for the ethical handling, distribution, and use of human bodies for educational and scientific purposes in Oklahoma.
The Anatomical Board has significant administrative authority but must act within statutory limits and provide due process.
Donor consent and institutional compliance are central to the operation.
Case law supports the Board’s discretion but also protects procedural fairness and donor rights.
Disputes often revolve around export permissions, facility authorization, consent validity, and enforcement procedures.
RELATED Blog
0 comments