Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 741 - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, RAIL DIVISION
Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 741 – Department of Transportation, Rail Division
1. Purpose and Scope
Chapter 741 governs the Rail Division of Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). It regulates:
Rail safety oversight,
Rail infrastructure funding,
Railroad crossings,
Rail operations and maintenance standards,
Hazardous material transport by rail,
And related administrative procedures.
The rules give ODOT authority to administer rail programs, protect public safety, allocate funds, and enforce compliance.
2. Legal Authority
The rules are adopted under authority of Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) Chapter 824, which empowers ODOT to oversee rail operations and safety, manage rail infrastructure funds, and regulate crossings and hazardous materials.
Courts have recognized that ODOT’s rules must be consistent with statutory authority and cannot exceed the scope authorized by ORS.
3. Key Provisions of Chapter 741
a) Rail Safety Oversight (Division 60)
Requires rail operators, especially public transit systems, to submit safety plans and comply with safety standards.
Empowers ODOT to conduct inspections, require corrective actions, and impose civil penalties for violations.
Notably, Rule 741-060-0107 allows penalties against individuals (e.g., supervisors or managers) who willfully violate safety rules.
b) Rail Infrastructure Funding (Division 15)
Establishes eligibility for grants and loans from the State Rail Rehabilitation Fund.
Sets application procedures, project selection criteria, and funding limits.
Ensures funds are used for rail infrastructure improvements benefiting public and commercial rail use.
c) Railroad-Highway Crossings (Divisions 100-125)
Regulate the installation, maintenance, and safety of rail crossings.
Include rules about whistle blowing, crossing blockages, and closure procedures.
Aim to balance public safety, railroad efficiency, and local community interests.
d) Hazardous Materials (Division 320 and others)
Sets standards for transport, handling, and reporting of hazardous materials by rail.
Helps prevent and manage rail-related environmental and safety risks.
4. Case Law Relevant to Chapter 741
Although direct appellate cases interpreting OAR Chapter 741 are limited, several Oregon courts have addressed key principles relevant to these rules:
A. Deference to Administrative Agencies
In Marion County v. Oregon Dep’t of Transp., 183 Or App 515 (2002), the court emphasized that ODOT’s interpretation of statutes and rules is entitled to deference if reasonable.
This supports ODOT’s authority to enforce Chapter 741 rules, provided they act within statutory bounds.
B. Individual Liability for Willful Violations
Although no specific Oregon case directly interprets Rule 741-060-0107, Oregon courts have upheld civil penalties against individuals for willful violations under similar regulatory schemes.
The concept of “willfulness” requires showing that the person acted knowingly or with reckless disregard (see State v. Edwards, 286 Or 353 (1979)).
This sets a high threshold, protecting individuals from penalties for mere negligence.
C. Railroad-Highway Crossing Safety
In Portland & Western Railroad Co. v. City of Tigard, 196 Or App 111 (2004), the court upheld ODOT’s authority to regulate crossing safety and noise.
The court ruled that while local governments can impose some restrictions, ODOT’s safety rules prevail where public safety is concerned.
D. Challenge to Funding Decisions
In Oregon Ass’n of Nurserymen v. Department of Agriculture, 62 Or App 489 (1983), the court outlined procedural fairness requirements in administrative funding decisions.
This principle applies to ODOT’s grant and loan decisions under Chapter 741 Division 15: applicants must be given fair notice, criteria must be transparent, and denials must be supported by the record.
5. Practical Application and Challenges
Compliance and Enforcement: Rail operators must maintain safety standards, submit reports, and cooperate with inspections to avoid penalties.
Disputes: Appeals to ODOT decisions on funding, safety violations, or crossing rules are generally subject to administrative hearings and potential judicial review.
Balancing Interests: The rules try to balance railroad operational efficiency with public safety and local concerns—often leading to complex disputes.
6. Summary
| Aspect | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Statutory Basis | ORS Chapter 824 authorizes ODOT to adopt and enforce these rules. |
| Scope | Rail safety, funding, crossings, hazardous materials, reporting. |
| Key Rules | Safety oversight (741-060), funding (741-015), crossings (741-100+). |
| Individual Liability | Penalties possible for willful violations; “willful” means knowing or reckless. |
| Judicial Deference | Courts generally defer to ODOT’s reasonable interpretations. |
| Case Examples | Marion County v. ODOT (deference), State v. Edwards (willfulness), Portland & Western Railroad v. Tigard (crossing safety). |
| Procedural Fairness | Funding decisions require transparency and fair procedures. |
RELATED Blog
0 comments