Dram Shop Laws and Liability for Drunk Driving Accidents under Personal Injury
Dram Shop Laws and Liability for Drunk Driving Accidents
✅ What Are Dram Shop Laws?
Dram Shop Laws are statutes that impose liability on establishments (such as bars, restaurants, or liquor stores) that sell or serve alcohol to individuals who then cause injury or damage as a result of their intoxication—most commonly in drunk driving accidents.
These laws are named after "dram shops"—old terms for places that sold alcoholic drinks by the dram (a small unit of measure).
Purpose of Dram Shop Laws
To hold alcohol vendors accountable for irresponsible service.
To deter overserving intoxicated or underage patrons.
To compensate victims injured by intoxicated individuals who were negligently served.
Key Elements of Dram Shop Liability
To establish a claim under Dram Shop Law, the plaintiff (injured party) generally must prove:
The defendant (bar, restaurant, etc.) sold or served alcohol to a patron;
The patron was visibly intoxicated or underage at the time of service;
The intoxication was a proximate cause of the accident/injury;
The plaintiff suffered damages as a result of that accident.
Who Can Be Held Liable?
Bars and pubs
Restaurants
Nightclubs
Liquor stores
Private social hosts (in some jurisdictions)
Types of Plaintiffs Who Can Sue
Innocent third parties injured by the intoxicated person (e.g., other drivers, pedestrians)
Sometimes, the intoxicated person’s family members (wrongful death)
In some states, even the intoxicated person themselves (controversial and rare)
Case Law Illustrations
🧑⚖️ 1. Kelly v. Gwinnell, 96 N.J. 538 (1984) – New Jersey Supreme Court
Facts: A social host served alcohol to a visibly intoxicated guest, who later caused a car accident.
Ruling: The court held that social hosts could be held liable for serving visibly intoxicated guests who then injure others.
Principle: Dram Shop liability can apply to private hosts, not just commercial establishments.
🧑⚖️ 2. Ontiveros v. Borak, 136 Ariz. 500 (1983)
Facts: A bartender served a patron who had become visibly drunk. The patron later assaulted a person.
Ruling: The Arizona Supreme Court held the tavern liable, recognizing a duty of care owed by alcohol vendors to the public.
Principle: Serving a visibly intoxicated person creates foreseeable risk to others.
🧑⚖️ 3. Fassett v. Delta Kappa Epsilon, 807 F.2d 1150 (3rd Cir. 1986)
Facts: A fraternity served alcohol to a minor who later caused a fatal drunk driving crash.
Ruling: The court held that those involved in providing alcohol to the underage drinker could be held liable under Pennsylvania’s Dram Shop Law.
Principle: Liability extends to those who knowingly serve minors, even in social settings.
🧑⚖️ 4. Nevarez v. Thriftimart, Inc., 7 Cal.App.3d 799 (1970)
Facts: A store sold alcohol to an obviously intoxicated person who caused a car accident.
Ruling: Court refused to impose liability due to California's historic prohibition on dram shop liability at the time.
Principle: This case reflects variation in state laws—some states explicitly limit or reject dram shop liability.
Dram Shop Laws by Jurisdiction (Highlights)
| Jurisdiction | Dram Shop Law Status | Key Feature |
|---|---|---|
| Texas | Enforced | Requires proof of “obvious intoxication” |
| New York | Enforced | Allows recovery by third parties |
| California | Limited | Generally no liability for sellers, unless serving minors |
| Illinois | Enforced | Strict liability, no need to prove visible intoxication |
| Florida | Limited | Only if alcohol served to minor or known habitual drunkard |
Defenses to Dram Shop Liability
The person was not visibly intoxicated when served.
The establishment did not serve the alcohol (e.g., BYOB event).
The injuries were not proximately caused by the intoxication.
Comparative fault of the injured person (in contributory negligence states).
Damages Recoverable
Victims may recover:
Medical expenses
Lost wages
Pain and suffering
Property damage
Wrongful death benefits (if a loved one was killed in a DUI crash)
Practical Example
Scenario:
A bar continues to serve alcohol to a patron who is slurring speech and stumbling. The patron later drives home and crashes into another car, injuring the driver.
Legal Outcome:
Under most Dram Shop Laws, the injured driver can sue the bar for negligently serving a visibly intoxicated person, making the bar jointly liable with the drunk driver.
🔚 Summary
| Key Concept | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Dram Shop Law | Holds alcohol providers liable for serving intoxicated individuals |
| Core Requirement | Visible intoxication or service to minors |
| Who Can Sue | Injured third parties, sometimes even family of the intoxicated |
| Common Defenses | No visible intoxication, no proximate cause |
| Varies by State/Country | Some jurisdictions enforce strictly, others limit or reject |
RELATED Blog
0 comments