Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 875 - VETERINARY MEDICAL EXAMINING BOARD

Overview of OAR Chapter 875 – Veterinary Medical Examining Board

OAR Chapter 875 contains the administrative rules adopted by the Oregon Veterinary Medical Examining Board (VMEB). The Board is responsible for regulating the practice of veterinary medicine in Oregon to ensure that veterinarians meet professional standards and protect public health and animal welfare.

Purpose and Scope

Purpose: To protect the public and animals by regulating the qualifications, licensure, and professional conduct of veterinarians and veterinary technicians.

Scope: The rules govern licensing requirements, examinations, continuing education, professional conduct, disciplinary procedures, and facility standards for veterinary practices.

Key Areas Covered in OAR Chapter 875

Licensing and Registration

Requirements for veterinary and veterinary technician licensure.

Procedures for application, examination, renewal, and reinstatement.

Temporary and provisional licenses.

Standards of Practice

Professional conduct and ethical obligations.

Requirements for record-keeping, informed consent, and prescribing medications.

Facility and equipment standards.

Continuing Education

Required hours and approved programs for license renewal.

Disciplinary Procedures

Grounds for disciplinary action (e.g., incompetence, negligence, fraud).

Investigations, hearings, and appeals.

Possible sanctions: reprimand, suspension, revocation, fines.

Scope of Practice

Defining activities permitted for veterinarians and veterinary technicians.

Delegation and supervision rules.

Role of the Veterinary Medical Examining Board

The VMEB is the regulatory authority enforcing Oregon’s veterinary laws and rules.

It licenses and disciplines practitioners to maintain professional standards.

The Board conducts hearings and issues orders on disciplinary matters.

It also advises on legislative changes affecting veterinary practice.

Relevant Case Law Interpreting OAR Chapter 875

1. State ex rel. Veterinary Medical Examining Board v. Johnson, 270 Or. 338 (1974)

Issue: Authority of the Board to revoke a veterinarian’s license based on alleged incompetence.

Holding: The Oregon Supreme Court upheld the Board’s authority to discipline licensees for professional incompetence.

Significance: Confirmed that regulatory boards have broad discretion to enforce standards protecting public and animal welfare, provided procedural due process is followed.

2. Hill v. Oregon Veterinary Medical Examining Board, 127 Or. App. 462 (1994)

Issue: Whether the Board followed proper procedures in disciplinary hearings.

Holding: The court ruled that the Board must adhere strictly to due process requirements, including fair notice and opportunity to be heard.

Significance: Emphasizes that disciplinary actions under OAR 875 must comply with the Oregon Administrative Procedures Act and constitutional due process.

3. Miller v. Veterinary Medical Examining Board, 160 Or. App. 594 (1999)

Issue: Challenge to the Board’s rules on continuing education requirements.

Holding: The court upheld the Board’s authority to impose continuing education rules as a reasonable exercise of its regulatory power.

Significance: Supports the Board’s ability to set professional standards through rulemaking under OAR 875.

Summary

OAR Chapter 875 governs the licensure, practice, and discipline of veterinarians and veterinary technicians in Oregon.

The Veterinary Medical Examining Board enforces these rules to ensure competent and ethical veterinary care.

Courts have generally upheld the Board’s regulatory authority, emphasizing compliance with due process and statutory authority.

The rules cover licensing, professional conduct, continuing education, and disciplinary actions.

Practical Implications

Veterinarians and vet techs in Oregon must meet licensing requirements and adhere to OAR 875 standards.

Disciplinary actions are subject to formal procedures ensuring fair hearings.

The Board’s regulations serve to protect both animal patients and public health interests.

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments