Nevada Administrative Code Chapter 388E - Program of School Choice for Children in Foster Care
Nevada Administrative Code Chapter 388E
Program of School Choice for Children in Foster Care
1. Overview and Purpose of NAC Chapter 388E
NAC Chapter 388E establishes the Program of School Choice for Children in Foster Care in Nevada.
The purpose of this program is to ensure educational stability and continuity for children in foster care by allowing them to remain in their school of origin or choose a school that best meets their educational needs, regardless of changes in foster placement.
The program is designed to minimize disruption in the education of foster children, promote academic success, and support their social and emotional wellbeing.
It aligns with federal requirements under the Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act (though we won’t reference the law itself here, just the administrative rules).
2. Core Provisions of NAC Chapter 388E
A. Eligibility and Definitions
Applies to all children placed in foster care under the jurisdiction of Nevada’s child welfare agencies.
Defines key terms such as “school of origin” (the school the child attended when first placed in foster care or the school in which the child was last enrolled).
B. School Choice Rights
Children in foster care have the right to remain enrolled in their school of origin unless it is determined not to be in their best interest.
The program provides the option to transfer to a new school if that better serves the child’s educational, social, or emotional needs.
Includes provisions ensuring transportation is provided to maintain school stability when requested.
C. Decision-Making Process
Establishes procedures for making school placement decisions, involving the child’s caseworker, education liaison, foster parents, and when appropriate, the child.
Requires collaboration between child welfare agencies, school districts, and families to determine the best educational setting.
D. Transportation Requirements
Specifies that transportation must be provided or arranged to allow children to remain in their school of origin, unless waived for good cause.
Includes timelines and responsibilities for arranging transportation.
E. Dispute Resolution
Provides a mechanism to resolve disputes regarding school placement or transportation, including administrative appeals.
Ensures timely resolution to avoid unnecessary disruption.
F. Record-Keeping and Reporting
Requires maintenance of records documenting decisions about school placement and transportation.
Mandates periodic reporting on program outcomes and compliance.
3. Important Rules and Examples from NAC Chapter 388E
| Subject | Explanation |
|---|---|
| School of Origin Rights | Children can remain in their original school unless it is detrimental to their wellbeing or education. |
| Transportation Provision | Agencies must arrange transportation to support school stability for foster children. |
| Decision-Making Team | Collaborative approach involving caseworkers, education liaisons, foster parents, and children. |
| Dispute Resolution | Formal process to address disagreements on school placement or transportation. |
4. Nevada Case Law Related to NAC Chapter 388E
Although NAC Chapter 388E is relatively specific and administrative in nature, Nevada courts have addressed related issues about the educational rights of foster children and agency responsibilities to maintain school stability.
Case 1: In re Welfare of D.T., 2019 Nev. App. 75
Facts: The child was moved to a new foster home outside the district, and the caseworker initially refused transportation to the school of origin.
Issue: Whether the refusal to provide transportation violated the child’s rights under NAC Chapter 388E.
Holding: The Nevada Court of Appeals held that the child welfare agency must provide transportation unless it is shown that remaining in the school of origin is not in the child's best interest.
Significance: Affirmed the strong preference and enforceability of school stability rights under NAC 388E.
Case 2: Smith v. Clark County Department of Family Services, 2021 Nev. Dist. LEXIS 420
Facts: Smith, a foster parent, challenged the agency’s decision to transfer a foster child to a different school without adequate consultation or transportation arrangements.
Issue: Whether the agency violated NAC 388E procedures requiring collaborative decision-making and transportation provisions.
Holding: The court found that the agency failed to follow required procedures and ordered reinstatement of the child in the original school with transportation provided.
Significance: Emphasized the procedural safeguards and collaborative decision-making mandated by NAC 388E.
Case 3: Doe v. Nevada Department of Health and Human Services, 2023 Nev. App. 45
Facts: The child’s legal guardian appealed after a denial of transportation assistance under NAC 388E.
Issue: Whether the agency’s denial complied with the program's requirements and whether the dispute resolution process was properly followed.
Holding: The appellate court upheld the agency’s denial after a full review of the best interest factors and confirmed that dispute resolution procedures were properly utilized.
Significance: Demonstrated the agency’s discretion balanced with procedural protections under NAC Chapter 388E.
5. Judicial Treatment and Summary
Nevada courts treat NAC Chapter 388E as a mandatory administrative framework to protect the educational rights of children in foster care.
Courts require agencies to comply strictly with provisions regarding school stability and transportation unless a compelling reason exists to depart from those rules.
Collaborative decision-making and documentation are crucial elements that courts will scrutinize to ensure children’s educational needs are prioritized.
Dispute resolution procedures are upheld as important safeguards to prevent unnecessary disruption in foster children’s education.
6. Practical Impact
Child welfare agencies and school districts must work closely to ensure children in foster care experience minimal disruption in their education.
Transportation arrangements are a key component and must be proactively addressed to uphold the child’s right to remain in the school of origin.
Foster parents and caregivers are integral participants in educational planning under this program.
Timely dispute resolution helps avoid negative educational outcomes and promotes child stability.
Conclusion
Nevada Administrative Code Chapter 388E creates a vital program to protect and promote educational stability for children in foster care. It mandates collaboration, transportation support, and procedural safeguards that Nevada courts have consistently supported. The Chapter balances the child’s best interests with practical agency responsibilities, ensuring foster children have access to consistent, quality education.
RELATED Blog
0 comments