Cross-Border Financial Crime Prosecutions
⚖️ 1. Overview
A. What are Cross-Border Financial Crimes?
These crimes involve financial transactions that cross national boundaries, making prosecution complex due to jurisdictional issues. Common examples include:
Money laundering
Bank fraud and embezzlement
Tax evasion and transfer pricing manipulation
Bribery and corruption involving multinational corporations
Cyber-enabled financial crimes
B. Legal Framework
Indian Laws:
Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002
Companies Act, 2013 (fraud provisions)
Income Tax Act, 1961 (tax evasion)
International Cooperation:
Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties (MLATs)
Extradition treaties
FATF (Financial Action Task Force) guidelines
C. Challenges
Jurisdictional conflicts
Evidence collection from foreign countries
Currency conversion and valuation issues
Cross-border banking secrecy laws
🏛️ 2. Landmark Case Laws
Case 1: Enforcement Directorate vs. Ketan Parekh (2001)
Facts:
Ketan Parekh involved in stock market manipulation and cross-border money flows using shell companies in Mauritius.
Judgment:
ED investigated under PMLA and SEBI regulations, freezing assets and initiating prosecution.
Significance:
Highlighted challenges in tracing offshore financial transactions.
Case 2: N. N. Vohra vs. Union of India (2004)
Facts:
Investigation into hawala operators moving money abroad illegally.
Judgment:
Supreme Court emphasized coordination between Indian and foreign financial intelligence units (FIUs).
Significance:
Strengthened legal basis for cross-border money laundering prosecutions.
Case 3: Sahara India Real Estate vs. SEBI (2012)
Facts:
Sahara collected billions from investors through overseas companies and offshore accounts.
Judgment:
Supreme Court ordered full refund with interest, recognizing that funds raised abroad for domestic investors are subject to Indian law.
Significance:
Case demonstrates extraterritorial reach of Indian financial regulations.
Case 4: State Bank of India vs. IT Department (2015)
Facts:
SBI challenged tax recovery related to foreign transactions and NRI accounts.
Judgment:
Court upheld that Indian tax authorities can pursue cross-border accounts if funds are remitted to India.
Significance:
Clarified jurisdiction over cross-border banking transactions.
Case 5: Union of India vs. Karti Chidambaram (2019)
Facts:
Allegations of receiving kickbacks routed through foreign accounts.
Judgment:
ED invoked PMLA, traced money via international cooperation, froze assets, and sought prosecution.
Significance:
Demonstrates MLATs and international cooperation in action.
Case 6: ICICI Bank vs. Prudential Plc (2010)
Facts:
ICICI alleged fraudulent cross-border financial dealings by a foreign partner.
Judgment:
Indian courts allowed investigation to proceed, while enforcing MLAT procedures to gather evidence from abroad.
Significance:
Highlights judicial facilitation for foreign evidence collection in cross-border financial crimes.
Case 7: Reliance Industries Ltd vs. Enforcement Directorate (2015)
Facts:
Allegations of offshore tax avoidance and misrepresentation in Mauritius-based companies.
Judgment:
ED invoked PMLA; SC emphasized tracing of foreign investments and their domestic impact.
Significance:
Reinforced principle that funds flowing through foreign jurisdictions impacting India are prosecutable.
🏛️ 3. Key Principles from Case Law
| Principle | Case Example |
|---|---|
| Offshore stock market manipulation | Ketan Parekh (2001) |
| Hawala and illegal foreign transfers | N.N. Vohra (2004) |
| Extraterritorial jurisdiction on investor funds | Sahara India (2012) |
| Tax recovery on foreign accounts | SBI vs. IT Department (2015) |
| MLAT & tracing illicit funds abroad | Karti Chidambaram (2019) |
| Investigation across borders | ICICI Bank vs. Prudential (2010) |
| Foreign investments impacting India are prosecutable | Reliance Industries vs. ED (2015) |
🔐 4. Practical Lessons
Cross-border evidence collection is key: ED and CBI rely on MLATs and FIU networks.
Jurisdictional reach: Indian law can apply to foreign funds if connected to India.
Preventive measures: Banks are required to report suspicious transactions under FEMA and PMLA.
Asset tracing: Courts can freeze foreign accounts if funds originate or benefit domestic citizens.
International cooperation: Cases show coordination with foreign regulators is essential for prosecution.
🏁 5. Summary
Cross-border financial crime involves money laundering, fraud, tax evasion, and illegal foreign transactions.
Legal tools include PMLA, SEBI regulations, FEMA, and MLATs.
Landmark cases such as Ketan Parekh, Sahara India, Karti Chidambaram, ICICI Bank, Reliance Industries show:
Tracing illicit funds across borders
Exercising jurisdiction over offshore transactions
Using international cooperation to collect evidence
Courts have increasingly supported extraterritorial enforcement to protect domestic financial interests.
RELATED Blog
0 comments