Training For Terrorist Activities Prosecutions
Overview of Training for Terrorist Activities Prosecutions
Legal Framework:
Federal Law – 18 U.S.C. § 2339A and § 2339B
§ 2339A: Criminalizes providing material support or resources to terrorists or terrorist organizations, including training, instruction, or expert advice.
§ 2339B: Specifically prohibits providing material support to designated foreign terrorist organizations, including training, personnel, or services.
Key Elements for Prosecution
The defendant knowingly provided training, instruction, or expert assistance.
The training is intended to facilitate terrorist activities.
Proof of intent or knowledge that the training would be used for terrorism.
Evidence Types
Testimony of trainees or co-conspirators.
Online communications, videos, and manuals.
Surveillance and undercover operations.
Typical Penalties
Federal prison terms of 10–20 years or more, depending on the severity and intent.
For conspiracy charges, penalties may be combined with other terrorism-related offenses.
Detailed Case Analyses
1. United States v. James Cromitie (2011, New York)
Background:
Cromitie and co-conspirators were arrested for plotting attacks on synagogues and military facilities, following terrorist training provided by undercover FBI agents.
Legal Proceedings:
Charged under 18 U.S.C. § 2339B (providing and receiving terrorist training) and conspiracy statutes.
Evidence included recorded training sessions, surveillance, and online communications with agents posing as terrorist recruiters.
Outcome:
Convicted and sentenced to 25 years in federal prison.
Demonstrated that training individuals to commit terrorist attacks, even with government involvement, constitutes a prosecutable offense.
2. United States v. Naser Jason Abdo (2012, Texas)
Background:
Abdo attempted to travel overseas for terrorist training and possessed materials for bombing a military facility.
Legal Proceedings:
Prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. § 2339A and § 2332a for attempting to receive terrorist training and plan attacks.
Evidence included firearms, explosives manuals, online research, and travel plans.
Outcome:
Convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment.
Highlighted that preparing to receive training with intent to commit terrorism is prosecutable.
3. United States v. David Headley (2010, Illinois)
Background:
Headley trained with terrorist organizations abroad and scouted targets for attacks in India, including the 2008 Mumbai attacks.
Legal Proceedings:
Charged under 18 U.S.C. § 2339B (material support and training) and conspiracy statutes.
Evidence included travel records, communications with terrorist organizations, and reconnaissance reports.
Outcome:
Pleaded guilty and sentenced to 35 years in federal prison.
Demonstrated prosecution of individuals who receive training overseas and provide support to terrorist groups.
4. United States v. Tarek Mehanna (2012, Massachusetts)
Background:
Mehanna was accused of receiving and providing training and materials to support terrorist activities, including bomb-making instruction.
Legal Proceedings:
Federal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 2339A.
Evidence included online materials, communications with extremist groups, and instructional videos.
Outcome:
Convicted on multiple counts and sentenced to 17 years federal prison.
Highlighted prosecution for digital dissemination of terrorist training content.
5. United States v. Abid Naseer (2015, New York)
Background:
Naseer provided online training materials and guidance to ISIS recruits, intending to facilitate attacks in the US and UK.
Legal Proceedings:
Federal charges under 18 U.S.C. § 2339B.
Evidence included encrypted communications, online manuals, and guidance documents.
Outcome:
Convicted and sentenced to 28 years federal prison.
Showed that virtual or online training counts as material support.
6. United States v. Mohamad Jamal Khweis (2016, Virginia)
Background:
Khweis traveled to Syria to receive terrorist training from ISIS, planning to return to the US to commit attacks.
Legal Proceedings:
Prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. § 2339A and § 2339B.
Evidence included travel records, interviews, and communication logs with terrorist handlers.
Outcome:
Convicted and sentenced to 20 years federal prison.
Demonstrated that receiving training abroad with intent to commit terrorism is prosecutable upon return.
7. United States v. Omar Faraj Saeed Al Hardan (2017, New York)
Background:
Al Hardan trained individuals in the US to build improvised explosive devices (IEDs) for terrorist purposes.
Legal Proceedings:
Charged under 18 U.S.C. § 2339A and § 2339B.
Evidence included live training sessions, instructional materials, and undercover recordings.
Outcome:
Convicted and sentenced to 22 years federal prison.
Reinforced that training others to commit terrorist acts constitutes material support, even if no attack occurred.
Key Legal Principles Across Cases
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Material Support Includes Training | Providing knowledge, instruction, or expertise to facilitate terrorist acts is prosecutable. |
| Knowledge and Intent Required | Offender must know the training will be used for terrorism or intend it to be used for such purposes. |
| Digital/Online Training Counts | Dissemination of manuals, videos, or instructions online is treated as training under § 2339B. |
| Federal and Interstate Jurisdiction | Prosecutions often involve federal courts due to terrorism statutes and cross-border implications. |
| Severe Penalties | Sentences range from 10 years to life, depending on severity, intent, and target of planned attacks. |
Key Takeaways
Training for terrorist activities is a federal crime, whether provided physically, online, or abroad.
Both giving and receiving training with intent to commit terrorism are prosecutable.
Material support statutes (18 U.S.C. §§ 2339A/B) are central to these prosecutions.
Evidence often includes communications, travel, instructional materials, and surveillance.
Sentences are severe, reflecting the threat posed by trained individuals and the potential for mass-casualty attacks.
RELATED Blog
0 comments