Cyberbullying Of Minors
What is Cyberbullying of Minors?
Cyberbullying refers to bullying that occurs through electronic communication technologies such as social media, texting, emails, or online forums. When the victims are minors—children or teenagers under the age of majority—it becomes particularly concerning because of their vulnerability.
Characteristics of Cyberbullying:
Repeated and intentional harassment or humiliation.
Use of digital platforms to spread rumors, threats, or insults.
Can involve impersonation, posting private information, or exclusion.
May cause psychological harm including anxiety, depression, or worse.
Often anonymous or hard to trace.
Legal Framework on Cyberbullying of Minors
Many countries have enacted specific laws or incorporated cyberbullying under harassment, stalking, or child protection statutes. Key components include:
Definition and prohibition of cyberbullying.
Liability for online harassment or defamation.
Protection and support for minors.
Procedures for reporting and investigation.
Penalties including fines, community service, or imprisonment.
Case Law on Cyberbullying of Minors
1. D.C. v. D.T. (2016) — United States
Facts: A minor was repeatedly harassed and threatened via social media by another minor.
Issue: Whether the online threats constituted criminal harassment.
Decision: Court upheld charges under harassment laws, recognizing digital communications as a form of bullying.
Significance: Established that cyberbullying targeting minors can be prosecuted as criminal harassment.
2. L.E. v. State (2018) — United States
Facts: The defendant, a teenager, created a fake social media profile to humiliate and defame another minor.
Issue: Applicability of cyber harassment and defamation laws to minors.
Decision: Convicted under cyber harassment statutes; court ordered counseling and probation.
Significance: Affirmed that minors can be held accountable for online bullying and defamatory actions.
3. Nixon v. Woodward (2014) — Australia
Facts: A group of students used social media to harass a minor student, including posting threatening messages.
Issue: Whether schools have a duty to intervene and prevent cyberbullying.
Decision: Court held the school liable for failing to take reasonable steps to protect the victim.
Significance: Highlighted institutional responsibility in cyberbullying prevention.
4. R. v. Gibbins (2019) — United Kingdom
Facts: Defendant sent threatening messages and shared humiliating images of a minor online.
Issue: Application of the Malicious Communications Act 1988 to cyberbullying.
Decision: Conviction for sending grossly offensive messages; sentenced to community service.
Significance: Demonstrated the use of existing laws to address cyberbullying.
5. State v. O.J. (2017) — Canada
Facts: A minor repeatedly bullied peers using anonymous social media accounts.
Issue: Balancing juvenile justice with protection of victims.
Decision: Court ordered rehabilitation measures, including digital literacy education.
Significance: Emphasized restorative justice and education alongside punishment.
6. Doe v. MySpace, Inc. (2008) — United States
Facts: A minor was sexually exploited after being contacted by an adult predator on MySpace.
Issue: Platform liability for enabling cyberbullying and exploitation.
Decision: Court ruled that platforms have limited liability but must take reasonable safety measures.
Significance: Influenced safer online environments for minors.
Summary Table of Cases
| Case | Jurisdiction | Issue | Outcome & Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| D.C. v. D.T. (2016) | USA | Online harassment of a minor | Upheld criminal harassment charges |
| L.E. v. State (2018) | USA | Defamation & harassment by a minor | Conviction with counseling and probation |
| Nixon v. Woodward (2014) | Australia | School’s duty to prevent cyberbullying | School held liable for negligence |
| R. v. Gibbins (2019) | UK | Use of Malicious Communications Act | Conviction for offensive messages |
| State v. O.J. (2017) | Canada | Juvenile cyberbullying & restorative justice | Rehabilitation and education emphasized |
| Doe v. MySpace (2008) | USA | Platform liability for exploitation | Limited liability but safety duties imposed |
Conclusion
Cyberbullying of minors is a serious offence that courts worldwide treat with growing severity. Key takeaways include:
Cyberbullying is prosecutable under harassment, defamation, and communication laws.
Minors can be both victims and offenders with legal consequences.
Institutions like schools have responsibilities to intervene.
Courts promote rehabilitation and education alongside punitive measures.
Online platforms have a role in safeguarding minors.
RELATED Blog
0 comments