Human Rights And Afghan Criminal Law
✅ Overview: Human Rights and Afghan Criminal Law
Afghanistan is a signatory to several key international human rights instruments, including:
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)
According to Article 7 of the 2004 Constitution of Afghanistan:
"The state shall observe the United Nations Charter, international treaties, international conventions that Afghanistan has signed, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights."
Meanwhile, Afghan Criminal Law — primarily codified in:
The 2017 Penal Code
Law on Elimination of Violence Against Women (EVAW Law, 2009)
Criminal Procedure Code
— attempts to incorporate elements of both Islamic law (Sharia) and international human rights norms, though tensions exist between these two systems.
⚖️ Case 1: Farkhunda Malikzada (2015)
Issue: Right to a Fair Trial, Protection from Mob Justice
Background:
Farkhunda, a 27-year-old woman, was falsely accused of burning the Quran in Kabul. She was publicly beaten, stoned, run over by a car, and set on fire by a mob. Police were present but failed to intervene effectively.
Human Rights Violations:
Right to life (Article 6, ICCPR)
Right to fair trial (Article 14, ICCPR)
Protection against torture and inhuman treatment (Article 7, ICCPR)
Legal Outcome:
Several perpetrators were arrested.
Four were sentenced to death, later commuted to prison sentences.
11 police officers were convicted for dereliction of duty.
Analysis:
This case highlighted systemic failures in criminal justice enforcement and deep societal issues. It raised questions about state responsibility to protect individuals, especially women, against mob violence.
⚖️ Case 2: Setara (Pseudonym, 2013) – Rape and Forced Marriage Case
Issue: Violence Against Women, Right to Justice
Background:
Setara, a teenage girl from Herat, was repeatedly raped by a local warlord who later forced her into marriage. She attempted to report the rape but was threatened and dismissed by local authorities.
Legal Challenges:
Under Afghan law, rape is criminalized, but evidence standards are often extremely high.
In rural areas, customary law (Jirgas) sometimes overrides formal courts.
Human Rights Violations:
Right to bodily integrity and dignity
Right to legal protection and access to justice
Freedom from cruel and degrading treatment
Legal Outcome:
After media attention and pressure from NGOs, the case was re-opened.
The warlord was arrested but released shortly after due to lack of "sufficient evidence."
Analysis:
This case illustrates how patriarchal structures and corruption undermine women's rights. Despite the EVAW law, implementation remains weak, especially in remote areas.
⚖️ Case 3: Maria’s Imprisonment for ‘Zina’ (2011)
Issue: Criminalization of Adultery and its Clash with Human Rights
Background:
Maria, 19, was raped by her cousin. When she reported it, she was arrested and charged with "Zina" (sex outside marriage), a hudood crime under Afghan law.
Human Rights Concerns:
Victim criminalized instead of the perpetrator
Violation of fair trial standards
Discrimination based on gender
Legal Outcome:
Maria was sentenced to 12 years in prison.
After international pressure and media coverage, she was granted a presidential pardon.
Analysis:
This case reflects how victims of sexual violence are often treated as criminals due to misinterpretation of Islamic principles and outdated legal norms. It underscores the urgent need for judicial training and reform of zina laws in line with human rights standards.
⚖️ Case 4: Journalist Parwiz Kambakhsh (2007)
Issue: Freedom of Expression and Religious Sensitivities
Background:
Kambakhsh, a journalism student, was arrested for allegedly distributing material critical of Islam and women’s rights in Islam. He was charged with blasphemy and initially sentenced to death.
Human Rights Violations:
Right to freedom of expression (Article 19, ICCPR)
Right to a fair trial
Freedom from cruel punishment
Legal Outcome:
Death sentence was commuted to 20 years in prison.
After international outcry, he was secretly released in 2009 and fled the country.
Analysis:
This case demonstrates how freedom of speech remains restricted when it collides with religious and cultural taboos. It also highlighted political interference in the judiciary.
⚖️ Case 5: Bibi Aisha (2010)
Issue: Mutilation, Domestic Violence, and State Protection
Background:
Bibi Aisha, an 18-year-old girl from Uruzgan Province, had her nose and ears cut off by her husband and in-laws as punishment for fleeing domestic abuse.
Legal Issues:
Under Afghan law, such mutilation is a criminal offense.
EVAW Law applies, but enforcement was weak.
Human Rights Violations:
Right to be free from torture and cruel treatment
Right to health and physical integrity
Right to protection from domestic violence
Legal Outcome:
After international attention (including a TIME Magazine cover), she was flown to the US for surgery.
Her husband was briefly arrested but released due to lack of prosecution.
Analysis:
This case became a symbol of Afghan women’s suffering and the state's failure to protect them. It prompted greater advocacy for enforcement of the EVAW law, but also led to political backlash.
🔍 Conclusion
These cases reveal that while Afghan criminal law has provisions meant to align with international human rights standards, implementation remains deeply flawed due to:
Corruption
Patriarchal traditions
Weak judiciary
Political interference
Tension between Sharia law and international norms
There is an urgent need for:
Judicial reform
Legal education
Protection mechanisms for women and minorities
Accountability for state actors
Afghanistan’s future in human rights protection largely depends on political will, rule of law, and public awareness.
RELATED Blog
0 comments