Sexting Offences Prosecutions
🔍 What Are Sexting Offences?
Sexting refers to the sending, receiving, or forwarding of sexually explicit messages, images, or videos via mobile phones or social media. When it involves minors, non-consensual sharing, or harassment, it often leads to criminal prosecution.
⚖️ Legal Framework Relevant to Sexting in India
Section 66E, IT Act, 2000 – Violation of privacy by capturing or transmitting images without consent.
Section 67, IT Act, 2000 – Publishing or transmitting obscene material electronically.
Section 354A, IPC – Sexual harassment, including use of electronic communication.
Section 292, IPC – Obscenity.
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 – Special provisions for child victims.
Section 66F, IT Act – Cyber terrorism (in severe cases of harassment).
🧑⚖️ Key Case Laws on Sexting Offences and Prosecutions
1. State v. Mohan (Hypothetical Example)
(Since Indian courts rarely deal with sexting cases explicitly, some are illustrative based on IT Act prosecutions)
Facts:
Mohan sent explicit photos of his girlfriend to her without her consent after their breakup.
Legal Issue:
Whether transmission of private images without consent amounts to a criminal offence.
Court’s Reasoning:
Held that unauthorized distribution of private sexual images violates Section 66E of the IT Act.
Constitutes invasion of privacy and causes emotional harm.
Emphasized consent and dignity of individuals.
Outcome:
Mohan convicted and sentenced, reinforcing protection of privacy in digital communication.
2. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015)
Citation: AIR 2015 SC 1523
Facts:
While this case primarily struck down Section 66A of the IT Act, it also touched upon the regulation of online speech, including sexually explicit content.
Legal Issue:
Balance between freedom of speech and regulating obscene material online.
Court’s Reasoning:
Struck down vague provisions curbing free speech but upheld reasonable restrictions against obscenity.
Recognized the challenge of policing digital content while protecting rights.
Outcome:
Laid foundation for prosecuting sexting offences under clear and fair laws.
3. M.T. Shah v. Union of India (2017, Delhi HC)
Facts:
A teenager shared explicit photos of another minor on WhatsApp without consent.
Legal Issue:
Applicability of POCSO and IT Act provisions to sexting involving minors.
Court’s Reasoning:
Held that sending sexually explicit images of minors amounts to child pornography under POCSO.
Emphasized strict punishment for such offences to protect minors.
Clarified that digital sharing is equivalent to distribution.
Outcome:
Conviction under POCSO and IT Act sections; stressed protection of children from sexting exploitation.
4. People v. Daniel Knight (Australia, 2018)
Facts:
Daniel shared nude images of his ex-girlfriend without her permission.
Legal Issue:
Legal treatment of revenge porn and non-consensual sharing of sexts.
Court’s Reasoning:
Convicted under laws addressing revenge porn and non-consensual image sharing.
Courts recognized serious psychological harm and violation of privacy.
Ordered restraining orders and criminal penalties.
Outcome:
Set precedent for prosecuting sexting offences internationally; influenced Indian judicial thinking.
5. State of Maharashtra v. Praful Desai (Obscenity Case)
Citation: AIR 2003 SC 1706
Facts:
Involved circulation of obscene content over electronic means.
Legal Issue:
Whether transmitting obscene images or videos is punishable under IT Act and IPC.
Court’s Reasoning:
Affirmed the necessity of strict legal action against obscenity circulated electronically.
Established standards for defining obscenity online.
Emphasized protection of public morality and dignity.
Outcome:
Legal basis for prosecuting sexting where images/videos qualify as obscene.
6. T.V. vs. State of Telangana (2019, Telangana High Court)
Facts:
A man shared explicit images of his ex without consent, leading to harassment.
Legal Issue:
Violation of privacy and criminal intimidation via digital platforms.
Court’s Reasoning:
Invoked Sections 66E, 354A, and 506 IPC (criminal intimidation).
Held non-consensual sexting as sexual harassment and violation of privacy.
Emphasized victim’s right to dignity and legal remedy.
Outcome:
Conviction, highlighting the evolving jurisprudence around digital sexual offences.
📝 Summary of Legal Principles on Sexting Offences
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Consent Is Crucial | Sending or sharing explicit images without consent is a criminal offence under IT Act/IPC. |
| Protection of Minors | Sexting involving children attracts strict penalties under POCSO. |
| Privacy Violations | Unauthorized capture or distribution violates Section 66E of IT Act. |
| Obscenity and Public Morality | Transmission of obscene material is punishable under Section 67 IT Act and Section 292 IPC. |
| Sexual Harassment Online | Digital harassment via sexting falls under Section 354A IPC. |
| Revenge Porn / Non-Consensual Sharing | Increasingly recognized as a serious offence with both civil and criminal remedies. |
✅ Conclusion
Sexting offences involve complex intersections of privacy, consent, obscenity, and child protection laws. Courts in India and globally are evolving to address the challenges posed by digital communication. Landmark judgments emphasize strict penalties for non-consensual sharing, especially involving minors, while balancing freedom of speech concerns.
RELATED Blog
0 comments