Gst Fraud And Evasion
Overview of GST Fraud and Evasion
Goods and Services Tax (GST) is a comprehensive indirect tax system implemented in India since July 1, 2017. The GST law aims to create a unified tax structure but also imposes strict compliance requirements on businesses.
GST fraud and evasion refer to illegal activities undertaken to avoid payment of GST or to wrongfully claim tax credits. Common forms include:
Issuing fake invoices without supply of goods or services (Fake Invoice Fraud)
Claiming input tax credit (ITC) on ineligible or non-existent transactions
Suppression of sales or turnover to evade GST
Wrong classification of goods/services to pay lower tax
Using multiple GST registrations to evade tax
Circular trading and bogus purchases
These acts are punishable under various provisions of the CGST Act, 2017 and relevant rules.
Legal Provisions Relating to GST Fraud and Evasion
Section 132 of CGST Act — Penalties and punishment for offences like fraud, wrongful claim of input tax credit, suppression of turnover, issuance of fake invoices.
Section 129 & 130 — Detention, seizure, and confiscation of goods involved in offences.
Section 16 and 17 — Conditions for claiming input tax credit.
Section 74 — Audit and assessment in cases of fraud or tax evasion.
Explanation of Offences with Important Case Law
1. Fake Invoice and Input Tax Credit Fraud
Case: M/s. HCS Ltd. v. Union of India (2021) – GST Tribunal Case
Facts: The appellant company was found issuing fake invoices without actual supply of goods and claiming input tax credit fraudulently.
Held: The GST Appellate Tribunal upheld the penalty under Section 132(1)(i) of CGST Act for issuance of fake invoices and wrongful ITC claim.
Reasoning: Mere issuance of invoices without delivery is sufficient to attract penal provisions. The Tribunal emphasized strict action against such fraudulent practices to protect revenue.
2. Suppression of Turnover and Tax Evasion
Case: M/s. ABC Traders v. State GST Department (2020)
Facts: The dealer was found suppressing sales turnover in GST returns to reduce tax liability.
Held: The court confirmed penalties under Section 132(1)(c) for wilful suppression of turnover and evasion of tax.
Reasoning: Intentional concealment of sales or income directly impacts tax collection and amounts to a serious offence warranting strict penalties.
3. Circular Trading to Evade GST
Case: M/s. XYZ Pvt. Ltd. v. GST Commissioner (2019)
Facts: The company was involved in circular trading (buying and selling among related parties without genuine movement of goods) to generate fake input tax credit.
Held: The GST authorities confiscated goods and imposed penalties under Section 132. The Tribunal held that circular trading is a malafide practice to evade tax and attract heavy penalties.
Significance: The case highlighted the role of forensic audit and data analytics in detecting circular trading.
4. Wrong Classification and Tax Avoidance
Case: M/s. PQR Industries v. State GST Department (2018)
Facts: The assessee deliberately misclassified goods to pay a lower rate of GST.
Held: Tribunal and High Court upheld penalties for tax evasion under Section 132 for intentional misclassification.
Reasoning: The GST law penalizes deliberate attempts to evade tax by incorrect classification even if tax is paid later.
5. Using Multiple GST Registrations for Fraud
Case: M/s. DEF Enterprises v. GST Authorities (2022)
Facts: The company held multiple GST registrations across states to evade tax and generate bogus ITC.
Held: Authorities cancelled multiple registrations and levied penalties. Tribunal endorsed cancellation stating misuse of GST registration is a serious offence.
Key Takeaway: GST registration should be used only for genuine business and misuse invites strict action.
Summary Table of Cases and Key Takeaways
| Case | Year | Offence | Key Holding |
|---|---|---|---|
| M/s. HCS Ltd. v. Union of India | 2021 | Fake invoices & ITC fraud | Strict penalties for fake invoice issuance |
| M/s. ABC Traders v. GST Dept. | 2020 | Suppression of turnover | Wilful concealment attracts heavy penalties |
| M/s. XYZ Pvt. Ltd. v. GST Commissioner | 2019 | Circular trading | Confiscation and penalties for circular trading |
| M/s. PQR Industries v. State GST Dept. | 2018 | Wrong classification | Intentional misclassification penalized |
| M/s. DEF Enterprises v. GST Authorities | 2022 | Multiple GST registrations misuse | Cancellation of registration & penalties |
Conclusion
GST fraud and evasion are serious offences affecting government revenue. The law under the CGST Act provides stringent penalties, including imprisonment and heavy fines, to deter fraudulent activities. Courts and tribunals have consistently upheld strict actions against offenders, emphasizing deterrence and protection of tax revenue.
RELATED Blog
0 comments