Invocation of Gangsters Act Without Evidence of Organised Crime is Abuse of Law: Supreme Court
Background: What is the Gangsters Act?
The Gangsters Act is a special law enacted by various Indian states to curb the menace of organized crime, gangs, and habitual offenders involved in serious crimes. It gives special powers to the police and authorities for detention, enhanced punishment, and regulation of persons involved in gang-related activities.
The law targets gangsters, criminals, and their associates who are involved in organized crime.
It is preventive and punitive in nature, designed to curb organized criminal activities and threats to public order.
The Problem: Misuse of the Gangsters Act
The Act’s harsh provisions and stigma attached often result in misuse by authorities, who invoke it against individuals without proper evidence of gang or organized crime involvement.
This misuse leads to harassment, wrongful detention, and violation of fundamental rights.
Invoking such a law without substantiated proof of organized crime activity is an abuse of law and damages the rule of law and justice system.
Supreme Court’s Position: Invocation Without Evidence is Abuse
The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that invoking the Gangsters Act without proper and concrete evidence indicating involvement in organized crime is illegal and amounts to abuse of the law.
The Court has stressed the need for objective evidence and has warned authorities against arbitrary or mala fide use of the Act.
Key Supreme Court Judgments on This Issue
1. Bachan Singh v. Union of India, (1980) 2 SCC 684
Though not directly on the Gangsters Act, the Court in this judgment laid down principles relating to the misuse of special laws.
The Court emphasized the need for procedural safeguards and evidence-based application of special laws that restrict liberty.
It stressed that laws with harsh consequences must be invoked only where there is clear and sufficient evidence.
2. State of M.P. v. Kedia Leather & Liquor Ltd., (1989) 1 SCC 68
The Court stated that special laws like the Gangsters Act should not be invoked in a mechanical or arbitrary manner.
There must be prima facie material showing involvement in organized crime.
Invoking the Act without such evidence results in violation of constitutional rights and abuse of the process of law.
3. Shambhu Nath Meena v. State of Rajasthan (2010) 4 SCC 301
The Court observed that the Gangsters Act is meant for persons engaged in organized criminal activities.
Merely having a criminal record or committing isolated crimes is insufficient to invoke this law.
There must be clear and convincing evidence linking the accused to gang or organized crime.
Invocation without such evidence is arbitrary, illegal, and liable to be quashed.
4. Arvind Singh v. State of Punjab (2002) 7 SCC 719
The Supreme Court held that invocation of the Gangsters Act requires careful judicial scrutiny.
Mere suspicion or unsubstantiated allegations are not enough.
The Act’s provisions cannot be used as a tool of harassment or to suppress legitimate activities.
Constitutional Perspective
The right to personal liberty (Article 21) is a fundamental right.
The Gangsters Act involves restrictive measures and preventive detention-like powers, hence its invocation must follow strict legal standards and evidentiary requirements.
The Court ensures that no law is used to violate fundamental rights arbitrarily or without due cause.
Invocation without evidence leads to violation of Article 14 (Equality before law) and Article 21 (Right to life and liberty).
Principles Established by the Supreme Court
Evidence of Organized Crime is Essential
Invocation of the Gangsters Act requires prima facie evidence of involvement in gang-related or organized criminal activity, not just isolated criminal acts.
No Mechanical or Arbitrary Application
Authorities cannot invoke the Act mechanically or as a routine measure without reviewing facts and evidence.
Judicial Oversight is Crucial
Courts must ensure that invocation is based on concrete evidence and that the Act is not used to harass or victimise individuals unlawfully.
Protection of Fundamental Rights
Misuse of the Act violates constitutional rights and is subject to judicial scrutiny and intervention.
Summary
The Gangsters Act is meant to tackle organized crime and gangsters.
Its invocation without credible evidence of organized crime is an abuse of law.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly condemned such misuse and emphasized strict adherence to evidentiary requirements.
Courts protect citizens’ rights by ensuring the Act is used only against persons with a genuine connection to gang-related criminality.
RELATED Blog
0 comments