Online Harassment Of Minors
Online harassment of minors refers to the use of digital platforms (social media, messaging apps, gaming platforms, email, etc.) to threaten, intimidate, bully, or otherwise harm individuals under the age of 18. This harassment can take many forms, including:
Cyberbullying (sending threatening or abusive messages)
Sexting-related harassment
Stalking or persistent unwanted communication
Spreading false rumors or images to damage reputation
Sexual exploitation or solicitation
Minors are particularly vulnerable because they might lack the emotional maturity or resources to effectively respond to or report such abuse. The law, recognizing this vulnerability, often provides special protections to minors in cases of online harassment.
Key Legal Principles in Online Harassment of Minors
Intent to Harass or Intimidate: The perpetrator must intentionally use electronic communication to threaten, harass, or intimidate the minor.
Impact on the Victim: The harassment must cause substantial emotional distress, fear, or other harms.
Jurisdiction and Scope: Online harassment can cross state or national boundaries, complicating legal enforcement.
Special Protections for Minors: Laws like the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and various anti-cyberbullying laws provide additional safeguards.
Case Law Examples
1. United States v. Drew (2009)
Jurisdiction: United States (California)
Summary:
In this case, Lori Drew was prosecuted for creating a fake MySpace profile to harass a teenage girl, Megan Meier, which led to Megan’s suicide. Drew's actions were considered harassment via electronic communication. Although Drew was initially convicted under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the conviction was later overturned on appeal due to issues with the statute’s scope.
Significance:
Highlighted the challenges of applying existing computer laws to online harassment.
Brought public attention to cyberbullying’s deadly consequences for minors.
2. People v. Marquan M. (2014)
Jurisdiction: New York, USA
Summary:
Marquan M., a minor, was convicted under a New York City anti-cyberbullying law for posting a video online that humiliated another minor. The video was found to cause substantial emotional distress. The case went to the state’s highest court, which upheld the law but emphasized free speech limitations.
Significance:
Affirmed the legality of anti-cyberbullying laws specifically protecting minors.
Balanced protection of minors with First Amendment rights.
3. R v. Brown (2016)
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Summary:
A young teenager was prosecuted for sending threatening messages to another minor via social media, constituting harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. The court considered the repeated nature and content of the messages as sufficient for criminal harassment.
Significance:
Showed the application of traditional harassment laws in the digital space.
Reiterated that minors can be both victims and perpetrators under the law.
4. State v. Donnelly (2017)
Jurisdiction: Washington State, USA
Summary:
In this case, a minor was charged with cyberstalking after persistently sending threatening messages to a peer over social media, despite requests to stop. The court ruled that the online communications constituted a credible threat under state law.
Significance:
Emphasized the seriousness of persistent harassment via electronic means.
Established that online speech can be criminal when it causes fear or distress.
5. Doe v. XYZ School District (2019)
Jurisdiction: United States (Federal Court)
Summary:
This civil lawsuit involved a student suing the school district for failing to stop severe online bullying by classmates. The court held that schools have a duty to address harassment occurring on school grounds or during school-related activities, including online platforms when linked to the school environment.
Significance:
Highlighted the responsibility of educational institutions in protecting minors from online harassment.
Encouraged schools to implement anti-cyberbullying policies.
Summary
Online harassment of minors is a significant legal and social issue with complex challenges.
Courts have used a variety of legal tools, from criminal statutes on harassment and stalking to civil liability and school policies, to address these cases.
The cases show a trend toward recognizing the real-world harm caused by online harassment and the need for proactive legal and institutional responses.
Protection of minors is balanced against rights like free speech, requiring careful judicial consideration.
RELATED Blog
0 comments