Judicial Precedents On E-Commerce Frauds
1. State of Tamil Nadu v. Suhas Katti (2004) – Cyber Stalking & E-Commerce Fraud Link
Court: Supreme Court of India (though initially in Cyber Appellate Tribunal and lower courts)
Facts: Suhas Katti posted fake ads on online platforms claiming to sell certain goods, collected money from buyers, and never delivered the products. The victims approached the police.
Legal Issue: Applicability of IT Act and IPC provisions for online fraud.
Judgment & Key Takeaways:
The court held that e-commerce transactions are subject to both IT Act, 2000 and IPC sections (such as 420 for cheating).
Fraudulent misrepresentation on an e-commerce platform amounts to criminal offense.
Important precedent: liability arises even if the seller operates online; digital records and transaction logs are admissible as evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act.
2. Ketan Shantilal Shah v. Union of India (2016) – Online Payment Fraud
Court: Bombay High Court
Facts: A buyer made payments for goods through an online platform, but the seller misused banking details and did not deliver goods.
Legal Issue: Whether liability falls on seller or intermediary (e-commerce platform)
Judgment & Key Takeaways:
The court ruled that the seller is primarily liable, while the e-commerce platform must exercise due diligence under Section 79 of the IT Act.
Highlighted importance of know-your-seller norms and digital audit trails for resolving e-commerce disputes.
Strengthened consumer rights in online shopping under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.
3. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) – Section 66A & Online Fraud Prevention
Court: Supreme Court of India
Facts: Though this case primarily challenged Section 66A of IT Act (freedom of speech online), it had implications for monitoring fraudulent online communications, including fake e-commerce advertisements.
Judgment & Key Takeaways:
Supreme Court emphasized that online intermediaries cannot be penalized unless they have knowledge of illegal activity.
Set precedent for liability limitation for e-commerce platforms, encouraging platforms to implement reporting and verification mechanisms to prevent fraud.
4. Flipkart Case on Fake Product Sales (Consumer Complaint, 2018)
Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC)
Facts: A buyer purchased a branded product on Flipkart; the product delivered was counterfeit.
Legal Issue: Liability of online marketplace vs. individual seller
Judgment & Key Takeaways:
The commission held that e-commerce platforms are jointly liable if they fail to verify sellers or monitor product quality.
Awarded compensation to consumer under Consumer Protection Act.
This case set an important benchmark for platform accountability in e-commerce fraud cases.
5. Online Job Portal / E-Commerce Fraud – Indian Bank v. One Person (2020)
Court: Delhi High Court
Facts: A fraudster posted online sale ads on e-commerce portals for electronics, collected payments, and disappeared. Victims approached their banks for reversal.
Legal Issue: Role of banks and intermediaries in e-commerce fraud
Judgment & Key Takeaways:
Court held that banks must implement stricter verification for online transactions and provide recourse for customers in case of fraud.
Reinforced use of digital evidence and transaction logs for prosecution under IT Act Sections 66C (Identity Theft) and 66D (Fraud by Impersonation).
Summary of Legal Principles from These Cases:
Seller Liability: Fraudulent e-commerce sellers are liable under IPC Sections 420, 468, 469 and IT Act Sections 66C, 66D.
Platform Accountability: Intermediaries are responsible to take reasonable care (Section 79 IT Act) but not automatically liable unless aware.
Consumer Protection: Victims of e-commerce fraud have remedies under Consumer Protection Act 2019.
Evidence: Digital records, payment gateways, chat logs, and email correspondences are admissible under Section 65B Evidence Act.
Bank/Payment Gateway Responsibility: Banks and payment processors must ensure fraud detection and enable chargebacks to protect consumers.
RELATED Blog
0 comments