Culpable Homicide Distinctions
Definition:
Culpable Homicide is the act of causing death of a person by doing an act with the intention of causing death, or with knowledge that the act is likely to cause death, but without lawful justification or excuse.
In many jurisdictions, culpable homicide is distinguished from murder by the element of intention, knowledge, or the circumstances under which the act is committed.
Distinctions in Culpable Homicide
Culpable Homicide vs. Murder
Murder requires a higher degree of intent (malice aforethought) or knowledge that the act will almost certainly cause death.
Culpable homicide includes acts done with intention or knowledge of causing death, but not amounting to murder because of mitigating circumstances (e.g., sudden fight, grave and sudden provocation).
Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder
Acts done without premeditation or planning.
Acts done in the heat of passion or under grave provocation.
Acts done with the intention of causing bodily harm likely to cause death, but without intention to cause death itself.
Lawful Justifications
Culpable homicide excludes lawful acts such as self-defense, accidents without negligence, or lawful executions.
Elements of Culpable Homicide
Actus Reus: The act must cause the death of a human being.
Mens Rea: Intention to cause death or knowledge that the act is likely to cause death.
No lawful justification or excuse.
Important Case Laws on Culpable Homicide and Its Distinctions
1. Virsa Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1958 SC 465
Facts:
The accused inflicted injuries with the intention to cause death or knowledge that the injuries were likely to cause death.
Holding:
The Supreme Court held that culpable homicide is distinguished from murder by the presence of “intention” or “knowledge.” Mere intention to cause bodily injury that is likely to cause death without the intention to kill may amount to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
Legal Principle:
Culpable homicide requires intention or knowledge, but without the element of premeditation or malice necessary for murder.
2. K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1962 SC 605
Facts:
Nanavati shot his wife’s lover in a sudden fit of rage after discovering an affair.
Holding:
The court held that though the act was intentional, it was done in sudden and grave provocation, reducing the charge from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
Legal Principle:
Grave and sudden provocation can mitigate a charge of murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
3. State of Maharashtra v. Mayer Hans George, AIR 1965 SC 722
Facts:
Accused caused death by act done without intention but with knowledge of likely death.
Holding:
Court differentiated between intention and knowledge; culpable homicide can occur with either intention or knowledge.
Legal Principle:
Knowledge that an act is likely to cause death is sufficient for culpable homicide, even if intention to cause death is absent.
4. Rajiv Thapar v. Delhi Administration, AIR 1971 SC 2285
Facts:
Death occurred during a violent confrontation; the accused did not have premeditated intention.
Holding:
Court held that absence of premeditation or malice affects the nature of the offense, reducing it to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
Legal Principle:
Premeditation and malice are crucial for murder; their absence can reduce the offense.
5. Manohar v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1964 SC 188
Facts:
The accused inflicted injuries with the knowledge that such injuries were likely to cause death but without clear intention to kill.
Holding:
The court stated that if the act is done with knowledge that it is likely to cause death, it amounts to culpable homicide even if the intention to cause death is not established.
Legal Principle:
Culpable homicide can be based on knowledge without direct intention.
6. State of Punjab v. Joginder Singh, AIR 1994 SC 1489
Facts:
The accused inflicted fatal injuries but claimed absence of intention to kill.
Holding:
Court held that causing death by an act with intention to cause bodily injury sufficient to cause death amounts to culpable homicide.
Legal Principle:
Intention to cause bodily injury which is sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death can constitute culpable homicide.
Summary of Distinctions:
| Aspect | Murder | Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder |
|---|---|---|
| Intention | Intention to cause death or knowledge death is certain | Intention or knowledge of causing death but lacking malice or premeditation |
| Provocation | No grave and sudden provocation | Often arises from grave and sudden provocation |
| Degree of planning | Often premeditated | Usually spontaneous or impulsive acts |
| Punishment | More severe (often life imprisonment or death penalty) | Lesser punishment compared to murder |
RELATED Blog
0 comments