Gi Bill Fraud Prosecutions
What Is GI Bill Fraud?
GI Bill Fraud involves the illegal misuse or misrepresentation of benefits provided under the GI Bill—a federal program that offers education benefits to military veterans and their families. Fraud typically includes:
Falsifying enrollment or attendance records.
Misrepresenting eligibility to receive funds.
Schools or individuals submitting false claims to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).
Using benefits for non-approved expenses or programs.
The fraud can be committed by educational institutions, veterans, or third parties.
Legal Framework
GI Bill fraud is prosecuted under federal statutes including:
18 U.S.C. § 1341 — Mail fraud (often used because many transactions involve mail).
18 U.S.C. § 1001 — False statements to the government.
18 U.S.C. § 641 — Theft or embezzlement of public funds.
31 U.S.C. § 3729 — False Claims Act, which allows the government to recover funds from those who submit false claims.
Penalties may include fines, restitution, and imprisonment.
Key Case Law Examples
1. United States v. Hodges, 770 F.3d 323 (4th Cir. 2014)
Facts: Hodges, an education consultant, conspired with a veterans’ school to submit false enrollment certifications to obtain GI Bill benefits.
Charges: Conspiracy to commit mail fraud and false statements.
Outcome: Conviction affirmed.
Significance: Demonstrated that both individuals and institutions facilitating false claims can be held criminally liable.
2. United States v. Bennett, 615 F.3d 978 (8th Cir. 2010)
Facts: Bennett, a school administrator, falsely certified students as enrolled and attending to receive GI Bill payments.
Charges: Mail fraud and theft of government funds.
Outcome: Conviction upheld.
Significance: Clarified that knowingly certifying false attendance records to obtain GI Bill funds constitutes fraud.
3. United States ex rel. Levin v. Community Health Systems, Inc., 857 F.3d 571 (6th Cir. 2017)
Facts: Although primarily a healthcare fraud case, it involved false claims related to government benefits; principles apply to GI Bill fraud cases.
Outcome: The False Claims Act was used to recover funds.
Significance: Showed how the False Claims Act enables whistleblowers to assist in uncovering GI Bill fraud.
4. United States v. Davis, 808 F.3d 538 (2d Cir. 2015)
Facts: Davis, a veteran, submitted false enrollment information to fraudulently receive GI Bill payments.
Charges: False statements and theft of government funds.
Outcome: Conviction upheld.
Significance: Emphasized that veterans themselves can be prosecuted for fraudulently obtaining benefits.
5. United States v. Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (2016)
Facts: Corinthian Colleges, a large for-profit chain, was investigated and prosecuted for submitting false claims regarding student outcomes and attendance, leading to improper GI Bill payments.
Outcome: School shut down after investigations; executives faced criminal and civil actions.
Significance: Major example of institutional GI Bill fraud and government crackdown on for-profit schools abusing veteran benefits.
6. United States v. Zuniga, 714 F.3d 1116 (9th Cir. 2013)
Facts: Zuniga was convicted for submitting forged documents to the VA to obtain GI Bill funds.
Outcome: Conviction affirmed.
Significance: Reinforced that submitting fraudulent documentation to obtain veteran education benefits is punishable by law.
Summary Table
| Case Name | Year | Facts | Outcome | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States v. Hodges | 2014 | Conspired to submit false certifications | Conviction affirmed | Liability for facilitators and institutions |
| United States v. Bennett | 2010 | False attendance certifications | Conviction upheld | Certifying false info = mail fraud |
| United States ex rel. Levin | 2017 | False claims in govt. benefits | Recovery via FCA | Whistleblower role in uncovering fraud |
| United States v. Davis | 2015 | Veteran submitted false info | Conviction upheld | Veterans can be prosecuted too |
| United States v. Corinthian Colleges | 2016 | School submitted false claims | Civil and criminal action, school shut down | High-profile institutional fraud case |
| United States v. Zuniga | 2013 | Forged docs to obtain benefits | Conviction affirmed | Forgery and false claims prosecuted |
Conclusion
GI Bill fraud prosecutions highlight the federal government’s commitment to protecting veterans’ benefits and ensuring funds are used lawfully. Courts consistently hold:
Both individuals and institutions accountable.
False statements, forged documents, and fraudulent claims are prosecutable.
The False Claims Act is a powerful tool for recovering misused funds.
Penalties include fines, imprisonment, and restitution.
RELATED Blog
0 comments