Case Studies On Mob Lynching Prosecutions
1. Tehseen Poonawalla & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors. (2018)
Background:
This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed after a series of mob lynching incidents in India, demanding stronger preventive measures and stricter laws against mob lynching.
Key Points:
The Supreme Court directed the central government to frame guidelines to prevent mob lynching.
It emphasized that lynching amounts to a crime against the State and a gross violation of the right to life (Article 21) under the Constitution of India.
The Court stressed that lynching and mob violence cannot be treated as isolated incidents but must be addressed with urgency.
Legal Outcome:
The Court urged states to ensure that police take immediate action in mob violence cases.
It recommended adequate compensation to victims and assured prosecution of offenders.
This case laid down important directions for the police and administration to act proactively in lynching cases.
2. Kishan Bhai v. State of Gujarat (2017)
Background:
A mob lynching case where the victim was attacked by a group suspected of vigilante violence.
Facts:
The accused formed a mob, forcibly attacked the victim on suspicion of wrongdoing, leading to severe injuries and death.
The police initially showed reluctance to register FIRs against influential accused.
Legal Points:
The Gujarat High Court held that mob violence is a grave offense attracting provisions of Section 302 (murder), Section 147 (rioting), and other relevant criminal laws.
It reiterated that police must register FIR immediately and investigate without bias.
The Court ordered strict action against police officials who delayed or obstructed investigations.
Significance:
This case underscores the obligation of law enforcement to ensure prompt investigation and prosecution in lynching cases to uphold the rule of law.
3. Kishore Giri v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2020)
Facts:
In this case, a mob killed a man accused of theft, despite lack of any legal trial or evidence.
Court Findings:
The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that lynching is a barbaric and unlawful act which bypasses the justice system.
It noted that such acts undermine the constitutional mandate of due process and equal protection of law.
The Court also called for sensitization of police and public officials to prevent such violence.
Legal Outcome:
The Court ordered a fast-track trial for the accused mob members and directed compensation to the victim’s family.
It stressed on provisions of Section 302 IPC (murder), 149 IPC (unlawful assembly), and 34 IPC (common intention) for prosecution.
4. Vishwa Lochan Madan v. Union of India (2018)
Background:
This PIL was filed to urge the Supreme Court to direct the Union and State governments to adopt comprehensive laws against mob lynching.
Key Observations:
The Court observed that lynching is a human rights violation and a failure of the State to protect its citizens.
It highlighted that the absence of specific legislation leaves victims vulnerable and perpetrators unpunished.
The Court directed the State to ensure compensation, counseling, and protection for victims and their families.
Impact:
This case created significant pressure on the legislature to consider specific anti-lynching laws.
It led to various state governments enacting local laws, such as the Maharashtra Protection from Lynching Act, 2019.
5. Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum (1985) (Indirect relevance)
Though not a lynching case, this landmark judgment laid foundational principles of due process and protection of fundamental rights (Article 21), which courts later relied on in lynching cases to stress that no one can be deprived of life or liberty without due process of law.
Summary of Legal Principles from these cases:
Mob lynching is a serious offense attracting charges under IPC Sections 302, 147, 148, 149, and other relevant sections.
Police and state machinery must act promptly and impartially in registering FIRs and investigating lynching cases.
The right to life and personal liberty (Article 21) is paramount and mob violence violates this constitutional right.
Courts have urged the government to introduce specific anti-lynching laws and provide compensation and rehabilitation to victims.
Public sensitization and police training are crucial for prevention.
RELATED Blog
0 comments