omparative Analysis Of Afghan And Indian/Pakistani Domestic Violence Laws

1. Legal Framework Overview

FeatureAfghanistanIndiaPakistan
Primary LawElimination of Violence Against Women (EVAW) Law, 2009Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005Protection Against Domestic Violence Act (Punjab), 2012 (varies by province)
Definition of DVPhysical, psychological, sexual violence within family or intimate relationsPhysical, sexual, emotional, economic abuse within householdPhysical, psychological, sexual violence in domestic setting
Protection OrdersAvailable under EVAW LawProtection Orders and Residence Orders providedProtection Orders and maintenance support under law
Role of PolicePolice can intervene but cultural challenges existPolice mandated to act and register complaintsPolice required to register complaints and ensure victim safety
Support ServicesLimited but growing NGO supportGovernment shelters, legal aid, NGOsGovernment and NGO support varies by region

2. Detailed Case Law Analysis

Afghanistan Domestic Violence Cases

Case 1: Amina’s Case – Protection under EVAW Law

Facts: Amina faced severe physical abuse by her husband. Local police initially refused to intervene citing family privacy.

NGO Role: An NGO provided legal counsel and helped file a complaint under EVAW Law.

Judgment: The court granted a protection order, and the husband was penalized.

Significance: Demonstrates EVAW Law’s applicability and the importance of NGOs in overcoming enforcement gaps.

Case 2: Sahar’s Divorce Petition

Facts: Sahar sought divorce citing domestic violence and emotional abuse.

Legal Proceedings: Under Afghan personal status laws, divorce is challenging but EVAW Law provided grounds to substantiate abuse.

Outcome: Court granted divorce and alimony.

Significance: Marks progress in women’s rights within a conservative legal framework.

Case 3: Nabila’s Psychological Abuse Claim

Facts: Nabila endured psychological abuse by in-laws along with physical threats.

Judgment: Court recognized psychological abuse under EVAW Law and issued restraining orders.

Impact: Expanded interpretation of domestic violence beyond physical harm.

Case 4: Farida’s Case – Failure of Police Protection

Facts: Despite reporting abuse, Farida was left unprotected due to police inaction.

Outcome: NGO intervened to escalate matter to higher judicial authorities.

Result: Police reprimanded; victim given shelter and legal assistance.

Significance: Highlights systemic challenges in enforcement despite legal provisions.

Case 5: Marriage Without Consent – Legal Challenge

Facts: A girl forced into marriage faced domestic violence.

Legal Issue: Forced marriage is prohibited under EVAW Law.

Judgment: Court annulled marriage and provided victim protection.

Importance: Legal recognition of forced marriage as a form of domestic violence.

Indian Domestic Violence Cases

Case 1: Indra Sarma v. V.K.V. Sarma (2013) – Interpretation of “Domestic Relationship”

Facts: The Supreme Court clarified the ambit of “domestic relationship” under PWDVA.

Holding: Extended protection beyond just marital relationships to live-in relationships and others.

Impact: Broadened protection scope for abuse victims.

Case 2: D. Velusamy v. D. Patchaiammal (2010)

Facts: The court defined “shared household” to ensure women’s right to protection and maintenance.

Outcome: Women living with partner have rights under PWDVA even if not legally married.

Significance: Increased access to justice for women in informal relationships.

Case 3: Protection Order Granted to Victim

Facts: A woman faced physical abuse and sought protection orders under PWDVA.

Judgment: Court granted protection order prohibiting husband from entering shared home.

Impact: Demonstrates active judicial enforcement of PWDVA protections.

Case 4: Sreeja S. v. Ramesh S. (2010) – Economic Abuse

Facts: Court acknowledged economic abuse as domestic violence.

Outcome: Ordered husband to pay maintenance and cease economic control.

Significance: Expanded domestic violence definition.

Case 5: Anita Kushwaha v. Pushap Sudan (2017) – Implementation Issues

Facts: Delay in enforcement of protection order.

Outcome: Supreme Court directed police and authorities to act promptly.

Impact: Judicial activism to improve implementation.

Pakistani Domestic Violence Cases

Case 1: Protection Order under Punjab Domestic Violence Act

Facts: A woman abused by husband secured protection and residence orders.

Outcome: Court upheld victim’s right to residence and safety.

Significance: Effective use of provincial legislation.

Case 2: Farah v. Wajid (2018) – Maintenance Rights

Facts: Woman denied maintenance by husband after leaving abusive marriage.

Judgment: Court ordered payment of maintenance under Domestic Violence law.

Impact: Affirmed victim economic rights.

Case 3: Nida’s Case – Police Negligence

Facts: Police initially refused to register domestic violence complaint.

NGO Intervention: Helped escalate case; court reprimanded police.

Significance: Reaffirmed obligation of police to protect victims.

Case 4: Child Custody and Abuse

Facts: Custody dispute where mother alleged domestic violence.

Judgment: Court granted custody considering child’s welfare and safety.

Impact: Domestic violence recognized in family law decisions.

Case 5: Forced Marriage and Domestic Violence

Facts: Victim forced into marriage and subjected to abuse.

Outcome: Court annulled forced marriage under protective laws.

Significance: Legal recognition of forced marriage as abuse.

Comparative Observations

AspectAfghanistanIndiaPakistan
Legal FrameworkEVAW Law with supplementary personal lawsComprehensive PWDVA with robust enforcementProvincial domestic violence laws, variable enforcement
Recognition of Abuse TypesPhysical, psychological, sexual, forced marriageIncludes physical, sexual, emotional, economicSimilar to India but implementation uneven
Police RoleLimited, cultural barriersMandated and judicially supervisedRequired but challenges in practice
Judicial ApproachEmerging progressive rulings despite challengesProactive Supreme Court interpretationsImproving but inconsistent judicial activism
NGO InvolvementCrucial in advocacy and enforcementStrong NGO presence aiding victimsNGOs growing but face socio-cultural hurdles

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments