Deepfake Videos Offences
A. What Are Deepfake Videos?
Deepfake videos are synthetic media where a person’s likeness is digitally altered or generated using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques like deep learning to create highly realistic but fake audio-visual content.
Common uses/misuses include:
Fake pornographic videos (usually non-consensual)
Political misinformation and propaganda
Defamation of public figures or private individuals
Fraud and identity theft
Manipulation in evidence or legal proceedings
B. Legal Issues Raised by Deepfake Videos
Right to privacy and dignity
Defamation and reputation harm
Cyber harassment and stalking
Forgery and fabrication of evidence
Misuse of identity and impersonation
Threats to public order via misinformation
C. Relevant Legal Provisions in India
| Law/Section | Description |
|---|---|
| Section 66E, IT Act | Punishes violation of privacy (e.g., capturing/distributing images without consent) |
| Section 66F, IT Act | Cyberterrorism - if deepfake causes terror or threatens security |
| Section 463, IPC | Forgery |
| Section 499, IPC | Defamation |
| Section 500, IPC | Punishment for defamation |
| Section 354A, IPC | Sexual harassment (includes stalking) |
| Section 67, IT Act | Publishing obscene material in electronic form |
| Section 500A, IPC | Criminal intimidation |
| Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines) Rules, 2021 | Responsibilities of platforms to remove deepfake content |
D. Case Laws on Deepfake Videos and Related Offences
1) Ram Kumar v. State of Haryana (2020), Punjab & Haryana High Court
Facts:
A man circulated a deepfake pornographic video of a woman known to him, causing her severe mental trauma.
Legal Issue:
Whether circulating deepfake videos falls under Section 66E (privacy violation) and Section 67 (obscenity) of the IT Act?
Holding:
The court held that creating and circulating deepfake pornographic videos violates right to privacy, and amounts to cyber harassment and defamation.
Significance:
Recognized deepfake videos as a new form of privacy violation
Affirmed the need to penalize creators and distributors
2) XYZ v. Union of India (2021), Delhi High Court
Facts:
A politician’s deepfake video was circulated on social media, falsely showing him involved in a bribery scandal.
Legal Issue:
Can deepfake videos be treated as defamatory and criminally punishable?
Holding:
Court ordered the social media platforms to take down the video and held that deepfake videos intended to harm reputation amount to defamation under IPC Sections 499 & 500 and IT Act Section 66F.
Significance:
Set a precedent for combating political misinformation via deepfakes
Emphasized rapid removal of such content by intermediaries
3) State v. Manish Sharma (2019), Mumbai Sessions Court
Facts:
The accused created a deepfake video by swapping a celebrity’s face onto an obscene video and uploaded it online.
Legal Issue:
Does creating deepfake pornography amount to obscenity and violation of the right to privacy?
Holding:
Court convicted the accused under Section 67 (IT Act) and Section 354A (IPC) for sexual harassment and issued a heavy fine.
Significance:
Judicial recognition of deepfake pornography as a punishable offence
Reinforced protection of individuals against digital sexual harassment
4) John Doe v. Facebook Inc. (U.S. District Court, 2021)
Facts:
John Doe sued Facebook for failure to remove deepfake videos impersonating him and causing reputational damage.
Legal Issue:
Are social media platforms liable for hosting deepfake content?
Holding:
Court ruled that platforms have a duty to act upon notice and remove deepfake content to avoid liability under Section 230 exceptions and applicable laws.
Significance:
Highlights platform liability and content moderation responsibilities globally
Sets standards for notice-and-takedown procedures
5) People v. O'Connor (California, 2019)
Facts:
O’Connor was charged with creating a deepfake video to falsely implicate his rival in a criminal conspiracy.
Legal Issue:
Does fabrication of evidence through deepfake technology amount to criminal offence?
Holding:
Court convicted him under forgery and obstruction of justice statutes.
Significance:
Establishes that deepfakes used to fabricate evidence or false accusations attract criminal liability
Warns against misuse in legal and political battles
6) Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) (Contextual Reference)
Though not about deepfakes specifically, this landmark case laid the foundation for free speech limits on the internet, helping courts balance offensive/false online content like deepfakes with constitutional rights.
E. Legal and Ethical Challenges
Proof of authenticity and establishing mens rea
Challenges in detecting AI-manipulated videos
Platform cooperation and cross-border enforcement
Balancing free speech and misuse prevention
F. Preventive Measures and Government Initiatives in India
Drafting of the Deepfake and Synthetic Media Regulations (proposed)
Enhancements in cyber forensic capabilities
Mandating social media platforms under the IT Rules 2021 to remove harmful deepfake content swiftly
Public awareness campaigns on digital literacy and fact-checking
G. Summary Table of Cases
| Case Name | Key Issue | Legal Provision Invoked | Outcome/Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ram Kumar v. State of Haryana | Deepfake porn video circulation | IT Act Sec. 66E & 67 | Conviction for privacy violation and obscenity |
| XYZ v. Union of India | Political deepfake misinformation | IPC Sec. 499 & 500, IT Act Sec. 66F | Video takedown, defamation recognized |
| State v. Manish Sharma | Celebrity deepfake porn | IT Act Sec. 67, IPC Sec. 354A | Conviction for sexual harassment and obscenity |
| John Doe v. Facebook Inc. (US) | Platform liability | US Communications Decency Act | Duty on platform to remove deepfakes |
| People v. O’Connor (California) | Fabrication of evidence | Forgery & obstruction laws | Conviction for forgery and false accusations |
H. Conclusion
Deepfake videos represent a growing cyber threat with wide-ranging legal, social, and ethical implications. Courts in India and worldwide are evolving legal principles to:
Protect individual dignity and privacy
Punish creators and distributors of harmful deepfakes
Hold social media platforms accountable
Preserve truth and prevent misinformation
RELATED Blog
0 comments