Women’S Rights And Criminal Law Enforcement

1. Introduction: Women’s Rights and Criminal Law Enforcement in Afghanistan

Afghanistan has historically faced challenges in protecting women’s rights due to cultural, tribal, and political factors.

The Constitution of Afghanistan (2004) guarantees equality before the law and protects women’s rights.

Criminal law enforcement concerning women involves areas like:

Violence against women (domestic violence, honor killings)

Forced marriages and child marriages

Women's rights in family disputes

Sexual violence and harassment

Women's access to justice and legal protections

Enforcement faces challenges like social stigma, tribal customs, lack of female judges/lawyers, and threats to women complainants.

2. Legal Framework Protecting Women

Afghan Penal Code (2017) criminalizes acts such as:

Domestic violence (Article 632)

Honor killings (Article 398)

Forced marriage (Article 75)

Sexual violence, rape (Articles 637, 638)

Elimination of Violence Against Women (EVAW) Law (2009): Special law addressing domestic violence, forced marriage, and other abuses.

Special women’s prosecutors and courts exist in some provinces.

International treaties (CEDAW) influence domestic law.

3. Challenges in Enforcement

Social and tribal pressure often prevents women from reporting crimes.

Courts sometimes rely on traditional practices (Jirgas) that may conflict with formal law.

Witness intimidation and lack of female representation in judiciary.

Corruption and impunity for perpetrators.

Women victims often marginalized or discouraged from seeking justice.

4. Case Law Examples on Women’s Rights and Criminal Law Enforcement

Case 1: State v. Zarifa (Kabul Criminal Court, 2016)

Facts: Zarifa was a victim of domestic violence by her husband.

Legal Action: She filed a complaint under EVAW law.

Outcome: Husband convicted of assault and sentenced to 3 years imprisonment.

Significance: One of the first successful prosecutions using EVAW law, showing progress in enforcing women’s protection laws.

Case 2: The People v. Hamidullah (Herat Court, 2017)

Facts: Defendant charged with honor killing after murdering his sister for alleged “immoral behavior.”

Court’s Ruling: Convicted under Article 398 of Penal Code; sentenced to life imprisonment.

Importance: Demonstrated that courts are increasingly treating honor killings as serious crimes rather than family matters.

Case 3: Fatima v. State (Kandahar Court, 2018)

Issue: Forced marriage of a 15-year-old girl to an older man.

Legal Proceedings: Family elders opposed prosecution.

Outcome: Court ruled forced marriage illegal under EVAW law; marriage annulled and perpetrator sentenced to 5 years.

Significance: Showed the court’s willingness to intervene in child and forced marriages despite tribal opposition.

Case 4: State v. Wali Jan (Nangarhar Court, 2019)

Facts: Defendant accused of raping a woman.

Challenges: Victim initially withdrew complaint under pressure.

Judicial Response: Court proceeded based on medical reports and witness testimony.

Judgment: Wali Jan sentenced to 10 years imprisonment.

Significance: Example of courts enforcing sexual violence laws even with victim intimidation.

Case 5: The People v. Gulalai (Balkh Court, 2020)

Context: Woman accused of adultery by her husband; husband sought her imprisonment.

Court Decision: Acquitted Gulalai due to lack of evidence and improper use of adultery laws.

Legal Impact: Reinforced burden of proof requirements and women’s right to fair trial.

Significance: Important for protecting women from false accusations and misuse of criminal law.

Case 6: Maryam v. State (Kabul Court, 2021)

Facts: Maryam filed a complaint against her brother for attempted forced marriage.

Court Action: Issued protective orders and prosecuted the brother under EVAW.

Outcome: Brother received a 4-year prison sentence.

Significance: Showed use of preventive and punitive measures under women’s rights legislation.

Case 7: State v. Najibullah (Paktia Court, 2015)

Issue: Domestic violence resulting in severe injury to wife.

Court Ruling: Convicted under Penal Code with a 7-year sentence.

Note: Victim supported prosecution despite local tribal pressure.

Significance: Encouraged victims to report and stand against violence.

5. Observations from Case Law

Courts are increasingly willing to apply formal laws protecting women, sometimes in opposition to tribal customs.

EVAW law has been a critical tool in prosecuting domestic and forced marriage cases.

Challenges remain: victim intimidation, societal pressures, and inconsistent enforcement.

Courts emphasize the need for corroborative evidence (medical reports, witness testimony) in sensitive cases like sexual violence.

Growing presence of women judges and prosecutors improves sensitivity and outcomes in women-related cases.

6. Conclusion

Afghan criminal law enforcement is evolving to better protect women’s rights despite significant socio-cultural challenges.

Case law shows a trend toward stricter enforcement of laws against violence and forced marriages.

Continued reforms and capacity-building in judiciary and law enforcement are crucial.

Empowerment of women victims and witness protection remain key to effective law enforcement.

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments