Default Bail Implementation
What is Default Bail?
Default Bail is a concept in Indian criminal law where an accused is entitled to bail if the investigating agency or the prosecution fails to complete the investigation or file a charge sheet within a prescribed period. It is meant to prevent prolonged detention of an accused without trial.
Legal Basis
The key statutory provision governing Default Bail is Section 167(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), 1973:
If the investigation is not completed and the charge sheet is not filed within 60 or 90 days (depending on the nature of the offence), the accused is entitled to be released on bail.
60 days for offences punishable with imprisonment up to 10 years.
90 days for offences punishable with imprisonment exceeding 10 years or involving the death penalty.
Important Case Laws on Default Bail
1. Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab (1980)
Facts:
The accused was held in custody beyond the prescribed period because the investigation was incomplete, and no charge sheet was filed.
Issue:
Whether an accused is entitled to bail if the investigation is not completed within the stipulated period under Section 167(2) CrPC.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that the accused must be released on bail if the investigation is not completed within the prescribed time unless the prosecution shows sufficient cause for the delay.
Significance:
This landmark judgment firmly established the right to default bail under Section 167(2) and laid down that the right is mandatory and cannot be denied arbitrarily.
2. Hussainara Khatoon v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1979)
Facts:
A group of undertrial prisoners was detained for a very long time without trial or charge sheet being filed.
Issue:
Whether prolonged detention of undertrials without charge sheet violates the right to personal liberty.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court ruled that detention beyond the prescribed period without charge sheet violates Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty). Undertrials should be released on default bail if investigations are not completed in time.
Significance:
It underscored the importance of speedy trials and enforced the implementation of default bail to prevent unlawful detention.
3. State of Rajasthan v. Balchand (1977)
Facts:
The accused was kept in custody for a period longer than allowed under the law without charge sheet.
Issue:
Can bail be denied if there is no delay caused by the accused?
Judgment:
The Court held that the accused cannot be denied default bail simply because the investigation is pending; the delay must be due to exceptional circumstances or caused by the accused.
Significance:
This case clarified that default bail is a statutory right and cannot be denied arbitrarily by the police or courts.
4. Hiten P. Dalal v. Union of India (1996)
Facts:
The accused sought bail after the expiry of the period prescribed in Section 167(2) CrPC.
Issue:
Whether default bail can be refused if the accused is involved in serious offences or is a flight risk.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court reiterated that default bail is a right and the court cannot refuse it unless the prosecution can justify delay or the accused has misused the process.
Significance:
It reinforced that the nature or seriousness of the offence alone cannot deny default bail.
5. Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan (2005)
Facts:
The accused was detained beyond the stipulated period under Section 167(2) CrPC and was denied default bail.
Issue:
Whether the court can deny default bail even after expiry of investigation period.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that if the investigating agency fails to complete the investigation within the stipulated period, the accused must be released on bail, regardless of the nature of the offence.
Significance:
This case strengthened the principle that default bail is a fundamental right under the CrPC.
Summary
Default Bail ensures that an accused is not unlawfully detained for extended periods without a charge sheet.
The right arises when the investigation is not completed within the prescribed time under Section 167(2) CrPC.
Courts cannot deny default bail arbitrarily and must uphold the accused's right unless justified delay is shown.
The right to default bail safeguards personal liberty and ensures speedy justice.
RELATED Blog
0 comments