Prosecution Of Forced Marriage And Early Marriage Cases
Prosecution of Forced Marriage and Early Marriage: Detailed Explanation
Key Concepts
Forced Marriage: A marriage where one or both parties are married without their full and free consent, often under duress, coercion, or threat.
Early Marriage (Child Marriage): A marriage where one or both parties are under the legal age of consent or majority, typically under 18 years old.
Both practices violate human rights and often lead to severe physical, psychological, and social consequences.
Many countries and international legal instruments criminalize forced and early marriage, considering them violations of rights to freedom, dignity, and protection from violence.
Legal Frameworks
International Human Rights Law: Includes instruments like the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), CEDAW (Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women), and regional human rights treaties.
National Laws: Most countries have specific provisions criminalizing forced and child marriage or treat them under broader laws on sexual violence, coercion, or child protection.
Prosecution Challenges: Often include evidentiary issues, cultural acceptance, victim cooperation, and jurisdictional complexities.
Case Law: Detailed Examples
1. R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte H (Forced Marriage Protection Order) [2005] UK
Facts: The case involved an attempt to force a young woman into marriage against her will.
Legal Principle: The UK courts introduced the concept of Forced Marriage Protection Orders (FMPOs), which are civil orders to prevent forced marriages.
Outcome: The court granted an FMPO, protecting the woman from being taken abroad to be married forcibly.
Significance: This was a landmark case in the UK setting up preventive measures for forced marriage before criminalization was introduced in the Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007.
2. R v. Anwar (2018) (Forced Marriage) – UK
Facts: Anwar was prosecuted for forcing his sister into marriage, using threats and violence.
Legal Framework: Prosecution relied on the Forced Marriage Act 2007.
Outcome: Anwar was convicted of forced marriage-related offenses, including coercion.
Significance: The case demonstrated the application of criminal sanctions and the courts’ willingness to punish forced marriage perpetrators, signaling a shift towards stricter enforcement.
3. Kenya: Republic v. Gideon Ndungu (Early Marriage Case)
Facts: A man was prosecuted for marrying a 15-year-old girl without parental or legal consent.
Legal Context: Under Kenyan law, the Marriage Act prohibits marriage below 18 without court permission.
Outcome: The court convicted the man of violating child protection laws and declared the marriage void.
Importance: This case reinforced child protection laws and highlighted judicial willingness to invalidate child marriages.
4. India: Independent Thought v. Union of India (2017) (Child Marriage Prohibition)
Facts: Petitioners challenged the legality of a provision allowing child marriage if the child “consented” after attaining puberty.
Supreme Court Judgment: The court ruled that consent of a minor to marriage is irrelevant and such marriages are void.
Impact: Strengthened legal protections against child marriage by affirming the non-consent principle and outlawing exceptions that allowed child marriage.
Significance: Landmark ruling ensuring stricter enforcement of child marriage prohibition.
5. Nigeria: Amina Lawal Case (Early Marriage and Rape Allegation)
Background: Amina Lawal was sentenced to death by stoning for adultery after having a child out of wedlock, under Sharia law.
Relevance: Though not a forced or early marriage prosecution per se, the case raised issues of child and forced marriage within customary and religious laws.
Outcome: After international advocacy, the conviction was overturned.
Significance: Highlighted conflicts between human rights law and customary/religious laws on marriage and consent, underscoring challenges in prosecuting forced or early marriages in some jurisdictions.
6. United States: United States v. Koua Po Moua (2006) (Forced Marriage Trafficking Case)
Facts: Koua Po Moua was convicted of forcing young women into marriage through coercion and human trafficking methods.
Legal Basis: Violations of federal laws including forced labor and trafficking statutes.
Outcome: Convicted and sentenced, the case combined forced marriage with trafficking charges.
Significance: Showed how forced marriage cases are increasingly prosecuted within human trafficking frameworks, enhancing prosecution tools.
7. South Africa: S v. M (2015) (Early Marriage and Sexual Offense)
Facts: The accused married a girl under 18 and was charged with statutory rape.
Legal Principle: The court emphasized that child marriage does not negate criminal liability for sexual offenses.
Outcome: Conviction upheld, reinforcing protections against early marriage abuse.
Significance: Clarified the legal position that early marriage cannot be used as a defense in sexual abuse cases.
Summary and Conclusion
Forced and early marriages are criminalized in many jurisdictions with growing enforcement.
Hybrid legal approaches often involve child protection laws, human trafficking statutes, and marriage laws.
Courts increasingly recognize that consent is critical and that child marriage or forced marriage violates fundamental rights.
International pressure and domestic reforms have led to stronger laws and better prosecution outcomes.
However, cultural challenges, evidentiary difficulties, and victim protection remain significant hurdles.
RELATED Blog
0 comments