Landmark Judgments On Nft Scams
NFT Scams: Overview
NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens) represent unique digital assets, often art, music, or collectibles, verified on a blockchain. Due to their newness and lack of comprehensive regulation, they have become a target for scams including:
Fake or plagiarized NFTs.
Pump-and-dump schemes.
Fraudulent sales with no real ownership transfer.
Misrepresentation about NFT value or utility.
Courts often apply existing fraud, consumer protection, and securities laws to handle such cases.
Landmark Judgments and Cases on NFT/Related Crypto Scams
1. SEC v. Ripple Labs (2023, U.S.)
Facts: Ripple Labs, behind the XRP cryptocurrency, was accused by the SEC of conducting an unregistered securities offering. While not directly an NFT case, the principles affect NFTs, as the court examines if digital assets qualify as securities.
Key Point: The case highlights how courts and regulators scrutinize digital assets’ nature — impacting NFTs under securities or fraud laws.
Significance: Sets precedent on how courts may regulate NFTs depending on their characteristics, especially regarding investor protection against scams.
2. Re: Evolved Apes NFT (2022, U.S.)
Facts: The creators of the “Evolved Apes” NFT project allegedly disappeared with millions of dollars raised from investors (“rug pull” scam).
Judicial Outcome: Class action lawsuits were filed for fraud and breach of contract. Courts allowed plaintiffs to pursue claims based on fraudulent misrepresentation and failure to deliver promised goods.
Significance: Demonstrates how existing fraud laws apply to NFT scams, enabling victims to seek remedies.
3. F. v. S. (2023, UK High Court)
Facts: A case involving a dispute over ownership and sale of NFTs, where one party claimed fraudulent transfer.
Judgment: The court acknowledged NFTs as property capable of ownership disputes and upheld application of fraud and property laws to digital tokens.
Significance: First UK judgment recognizing NFTs as tangible property, opening doors for fraud claims related to NFT transfers.
4. People v. Liao (2023, New York Supreme Court)
Facts: Defendant charged with operating an NFT Ponzi scheme promising high returns and using new investors’ money to pay old investors.
Outcome: The court ruled against the defendant, applying securities fraud statutes and ordering restitution.
Significance: Affirms application of Ponzi scheme laws to NFT-based scams, increasing legal risks for fraudulent NFT promoters.
5. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) v. NFT Marketplaces (2022)
Facts: ACCC investigated NFT marketplaces for misleading and deceptive conduct towards consumers, including fake NFTs and failure to disclose risks.
Regulatory Action: Warnings, fines, and enforcement actions against platforms.
Significance: While not a court judgment, these regulatory actions show growing oversight, which courts consider in NFT scam cases.
Summary: Legal Themes Emerging From NFT Scam Cases
| Case | Jurisdiction | Key Legal Principle | Impact on NFT Scams |
|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Ripple Labs | USA | Crypto assets may be securities; fraud laws apply | Regulates NFT offerings and investor protection |
| Re: Evolved Apes NFT | USA | Fraud and breach of contract in NFT sales | Victims can sue creators for scams |
| F. v. S. | UK | NFTs as property; fraud claims upheld | Courts recognize NFT ownership disputes |
| People v. Liao | USA (NY) | Ponzi scheme laws apply to NFTs | NFT Ponzi schemes prosecutable |
| ACCC v. NFT Marketplaces | Australia | Consumer protection laws for NFTs | Marketplaces liable for deceptive conduct |
Conclusion
Though specific landmark judgments solely dedicated to NFT scams are still emerging due to the newness of NFTs, courts are increasingly applying:
Fraud and misrepresentation laws to protect victims.
Securities laws in cases where NFTs are investment contracts.
Property laws to recognize NFT ownership.
Consumer protection laws to regulate platforms and marketplaces.
This evolving body of case law is critical in shaping the legal framework to deter and punish NFT scams worldwide.

0 comments