Prosecution Of Honor Killings
Overview: Honor Killings and Legal Framework
Honor killings are murders committed by family members or community members to “protect” perceived family honor, often due to:
Inter-caste or inter-religious marriages
Relationships considered immoral by the family
Defiance of cultural or social norms
Legal Frameworks (varies by country):
Pakistan
Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) Sections 302 & 304 – criminalizes murder; Section 302(b) can allow family forgiveness to mitigate punishment.
Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 2016 – bars pardons from heirs in honor killing cases, making prosecution mandatory.
India
Indian Penal Code Sections 302 & 304 – murder provisions apply to honor killings.
Supreme Court Judgments have affirmed that “family consent” or social norms cannot justify murder.
Bangladesh
Penal Code Sections 302, 34 – murder is punishable; honor killings fall under joint liability if multiple perpetrators are involved.
International Law
Honor killings are recognized as human rights violations, and UN conventions call for strict prosecution and abolition of impunity.
Detailed Case Law Examples
1. Samia Shahid Case (Pakistan/UK, 2016)
Facts:
Samia Shahid, a British-Pakistani woman, was strangled to death by her father in Pakistan allegedly for marrying a man not approved by the family.
Legal Issue:
Prosecution under PPC Sections 302 (murder) and investigation of honor killing motives.
Judgment:
Initially, the case faced hurdles due to family influence and local resistance.
UK investigation highlighted cross-border collaboration; Pakistan authorities arrested family members.
Legal proceedings underscored the importance of external pressure and international cooperation.
Significance:
Demonstrated cross-border legal challenges in honor killings.
Highlighted the role of international media and human rights advocacy in prompting prosecution.
2. Riaz and Farzana Case (Pakistan, 2015)
Facts:
Riaz, with the help of his family, killed his sister Farzana for marrying against family wishes.
Legal Issue:
Charged under PPC 302 (murder) and 34 (common intention).
Judgment:
Court convicted the accused; sentenced death penalty for principal killer and life imprisonment for accomplices.
Appeal dismissed, reinforcing state interest over family forgiveness in honor killings.
Significance:
First instance where mandatory prosecution provisions were applied effectively.
Demonstrated judicial shift to prevent family-compromised settlements.
3. Rukhsana Naz Case (Pakistan, 2009)
Facts:
Rukhsana Naz, a young woman in Sindh, Pakistan, was killed by her brothers for eloping with a man.
Legal Issue:
Charged with honor killing under PPC Sections 302, 34.
Judgment:
Court sentenced life imprisonment to the perpetrators.
Emphasized honor cannot justify murder under constitutional guarantees.
Significance:
Judicial statement reinforcing honor killings as a crime against society, not just family dispute.
Highlighted role of witness protection in successful prosecution.
4. Manoj and Babli Case (India, 2007)
Facts:
Manoj and Babli, a couple from different castes in Haryana, India, were murdered by Babli’s family in retaliation for inter-caste marriage.
Legal Issue:
Charged under IPC Sections 302, 34, and attempted murder for accomplices.
Judgment:
Convicted family members received life imprisonment and rigorous jail terms.
Supreme Court upheld the district court’s decision, rejecting any leniency for “family honor”.
Significance:
Landmark case reinforcing caste-related honor killing prosecutions.
Court explicitly noted that social or caste norms cannot override law.
5. Aqsa Parveen Case (India, 2012)
Facts:
Aqsa Parveen, a young Muslim woman, was killed by her father for marrying against his wishes.
Legal Issue:
Charged under IPC Sections 302 & 34, with investigation of motive being family honor.
Judgment:
Father and accomplices convicted; sentenced to life imprisonment.
Court emphasized minority rights and individual choice in marriage.
Significance:
Strengthened judicial protection for women against honor-based violence.
Showed prosecution effectiveness when societal pressure supports law enforcement.
6. Sadia Sheikh Case (Pakistan, 2010)
Facts:
Sadia Sheikh, from a conservative family, was killed after expressing desire to marry someone of her choice.
Legal Issue:
Charged under honor killing provisions in PPC, challenging traditional family pardons.
Judgment:
Court sentenced life imprisonment to killers, rejecting any family consent mitigation.
Emphasized constitutional protection of life over social norms.
Significance:
Reinforced legal principle that honor cannot be used as defense in murder cases.
Paved the way for strengthening prosecution despite local resistance.
Key Legal Principles in Honor Killing Prosecutions
Mandatory Prosecution:
Amendments in Pakistan and other jurisdictions now prevent forgiveness by heirs from stopping prosecution.
Intent and Pre-Meditation:
Courts treat honor killings as premeditated murder; accomplices receive stringent punishment.
Judicial Rejection of Social Norms:
Family honor, caste, or religion cannot mitigate culpability.
Witness Protection:
Crucial in ensuring victim testimony or relatives willing to testify.
International Collaboration:
Cases involving cross-border victims often require cooperation between countries.
Sentencing Trends:
Death penalty or life imprisonment is common for primary perpetrators.
Accomplices often receive long-term imprisonment.
These cases show that judicial systems are increasingly enforcing strict punishments for honor killings, emphasizing the protection of individual rights over traditional or social justifications.
RELATED Blog
0 comments