Financial Crimes And Anti-Money Laundering Act Enforcement
1. Introduction to Financial Crimes and AML
Financial crimes are illegal acts involving money, such as fraud, embezzlement, insider trading, tax evasion, and money laundering. These crimes threaten the financial system, economic stability, and public trust.
Money Laundering is the process of concealing the origins of illegally obtained money, making it appear legitimate.
Key laws in India regulating financial crimes include:
Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA)
Criminalizes money laundering and empowers authorities to attach, seize, and confiscate proceeds of crime
Establishes Enforcement Directorate (ED) for investigation and prosecution
Indian Penal Code (IPC) Provisions
Section 420: Cheating and dishonesty
Section 406: Criminal breach of trust
Section 120B: Criminal conspiracy
Companies Act, 2013 & SEBI Regulations
Regulate corporate fraud, financial reporting, and insider trading
2. Enforcement Mechanisms under PMLA
Attachment of Properties: ED can provisionally attach property involved in money laundering.
Investigation & Prosecution: ED investigates financial transactions and initiates prosecution.
Adjudication: Adjudicating Authority decides confiscation and penalties.
Special Courts: Handle PMLA cases to ensure swift trials.
3. Landmark Case Laws
Case 1: Enforcement Directorate v. Nirav Modi & Mehul Choksi (2018–present)
Facts:
Billionaire jeweler Nirav Modi and his uncle Mehul Choksi were accused of defrauding Punjab National Bank of over ₹14,000 crore.
Alleged fraudulent Letters of Undertaking (LoUs) were used to obtain overseas credit.
Legal Action:
ED invoked PMLA to attach assets and investigate money laundering.
Criminal complaints included IPC 420, 120B, and other financial fraud sections.
Significance:
Demonstrates multi-jurisdictional financial crime investigation
Enforcement included asset tracing, international cooperation, and extradition requests
Case 2: Sahara India Real Estate Corp Ltd. v. SEBI & Enforcement Directorate (2012–2016)
Facts:
Sahara Group raised funds through Optionally Fully Convertible Debentures (OFCDs) allegedly without SEBI approval.
Judgment:
Supreme Court directed Sahara to refund ₹24,000 crore to investors with interest.
ED initiated money laundering proceedings under PMLA, treating illegally raised funds as proceeds of crime.
Significance:
Highlights enforcement of regulatory compliance and AML measures in corporate fundraising
PMLA used to trace and confiscate illegally mobilized funds
Case 3: Vijay Mallya Case (Kingfisher Airlines) (2016–present)
Facts:
Vijay Mallya allegedly defaulted on loans of over ₹9,000 crore from Indian banks.
Legal Action:
ED registered PMLA cases for money laundering and asset concealment
Initiated proceedings for seizure of overseas properties
Interpol and UK authorities involved for extradition
Significance:
Demonstrates enforcement against corporate financial crimes and loan default laundering
Use of PMLA for provisional attachment and prosecution
Case 4: Ketan Parekh Stock Market Scam (2001)
Facts:
Ketan Parekh manipulated stock prices using circular trading and unaccounted funds.
Legal Action:
SEBI barred Parekh from the market; ED invoked PMLA to attach illegal proceeds
Investigations included tracking shell companies and money trails
Significance:
Early example of financial crime enforcement combining SEBI and ED powers
Demonstrated need for strict AML compliance in capital markets
Case 5: Rotomac Pen Fraud Case (2018)
Facts:
Rotomac Pen Company defaulted on loans of over ₹800 crore from banks.
Promoter and family allegedly transferred funds illegally to personal accounts abroad
Legal Action:
ED invoked PMLA to attach company and personal assets
Prosecution under IPC 420, 406, 120B and PMLA initiated
Significance:
Reinforced use of PMLA in corporate loan fraud and money laundering
Highlighted coordination between banks, ED, and courts
Case 6: 2G Spectrum Scam – Abdul Karim Telgi Case (2000s)
Facts:
Abdul Karim Telgi was involved in stamp paper counterfeiting and money laundering across multiple states.
Legal Action:
ED invoked PMLA to attach assets purchased from illicit gains
Conviction under IPC 420, 406, 120B along with PMLA penalties
Significance:
Showcased linkage between fraud and money laundering
Illustrated asset tracing and confiscation as a deterrent
4. Principles Derived from Case Laws
PMLA is Central to Money Laundering Enforcement
Confiscation, prosecution, and attachment of property are core remedies
Financial Crimes Require Multi-Agency Coordination
ED, SEBI, CBI, RBI, and international authorities often coordinate
Tracing Illegally Acquired Assets is Key
AML enforcement depends on following fund trails
Civil and Criminal Remedies Often Combined
Example: Sahara – refund to investors (civil) + PMLA action (criminal)
Global Cooperation is Essential
Extradition, overseas property seizure, and mutual legal assistance are common
5. Conclusion
Financial crimes and money laundering have severe economic and social impacts.
PMLA, IPC, SEBI regulations, and Companies Act provide a legal framework for enforcement.
Landmark cases such as Nirav Modi, Sahara India, Vijay Mallya, Ketan Parekh, Rotomac Pen, and Abdul Karim Telgi illustrate:
How asset tracing, attachment, and prosecution work
How multi-agency coordination and judicial oversight are critical
Effective AML enforcement ensures accountability, deterrence, and integrity of financial systems

0 comments