Environmental Crimes: Illegal Logging, Mining, Wildlife Poaching Prosecutions
1. Overview of Environmental Crimes in Pakistan
Environmental crimes threaten ecosystems, biodiversity, and public health. The main categories include:
Illegal Logging and Deforestation: Unauthorized cutting of trees or destruction of forests.
Illegal Mining: Extraction of minerals without proper licenses, causing environmental degradation.
Wildlife Poaching and Trafficking: Hunting endangered species or trading protected wildlife.
Legal Framework
Pakistan Environmental Protection Act (PEPA), 1997 – Main law for environmental protection.
Forest Acts (Provincial) – Regulate tree felling and forest management.
Wildlife Protection Laws (Provincial) – Protect endangered species; penalize poaching and trade.
Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) Sections 269, 270 – Address negligent acts endangering life and public health.
Prosecution Process:
Environmental complaints can be filed by forest departments, wildlife authorities, or citizen activists.
Investigations conducted by forest/wildlife officials, police, or environmental agencies.
Courts, including High Courts and environmental tribunals, handle prosecutions and compensation claims.
2. Landmark Cases on Environmental Crimes
Case 1: Illegal Logging – Galiyat Forest Case (2007)
Background:
Illegal felling of trees in Galiyat (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa) led to severe ecological damage.
Judicial Enforcement:
Forest Department filed a case under Forest Act, 1927, and PEPA, 1997.
Investigation revealed collusion between local contractors and officials.
Verdict:
Court convicted contractors and imposed fines; ordered reforestation.
Significance:
Demonstrated courts’ active role in deterring illegal logging and enforcing forest protection laws.
Case 2: Illegal Sand Mining – Indus River Case (2010)
Background:
Unregulated sand mining along the Indus River caused riverbank erosion and flood risks.
Judicial Enforcement:
Citizens filed writ petition in Sindh High Court invoking PEPA.
Court ordered immediate halt to illegal operations and directed environmental impact assessment (EIA).
Verdict:
Mining companies penalized; licenses revoked for non-compliance.
Significance:
First major case where public interest litigation (PIL) enforced environmental compliance in mining.
Case 3: Wildlife Poaching – Chinkara Deer Case, Tharparkar (2012)
Background:
Poachers killed endangered Chinkara deer in Thar desert.
Judicial Enforcement:
Provincial wildlife authorities filed charges under Sindh Wildlife Protection Ordinance.
Police investigation led to recovery of animal skins and hunting equipment.
Verdict:
Poachers sentenced to imprisonment and fines; wildlife department instructed to enhance patrolling.
Significance:
Highlighted judicial enforcement to protect endangered species under wildlife laws.
Case 4: Illegal Mining – Gilgit-Baltistan Marble Mining Case (2013)
Background:
Unauthorized marble mining in Gilgit-Baltistan caused landslides and water pollution.
Judicial Enforcement:
Writ petition filed in Gilgit-Baltistan Supreme Appellate Court citing PEPA and provincial mining rules.
Court ordered suspension of all mining operations and mandated environmental restoration.
Verdict:
Mining operators penalized financially; environmental mitigation measures enforced.
Significance:
Reinforced principle that economic activity cannot compromise ecological integrity.
Case 5: Illegal Logging & Wildlife Trade – Malakand Forest Case (2015)
Background:
Simultaneous illegal timber extraction and smuggling of wild birds from Malakand region.
Judicial Enforcement:
Authorities invoked PEPA 1997, Forest Act, and Wildlife Protection laws.
Court-appointed experts conducted site inspections and submitted reports.
Verdict:
Conviction of offenders; fines imposed; forests placed under stricter surveillance.
Significance:
Demonstrated integrated judicial enforcement of both forest and wildlife protection laws.
Case 6: Karachi Mangrove Destruction Case (2016)
Background:
Large-scale clearing of mangroves for real estate development.
Judicial Enforcement:
Citizens filed writ petition in Sindh High Court citing PEPA 1997.
Court held that destruction violated constitutional right to clean environment (Article 9 and 14).
Verdict:
Development halted; restoration program mandated; environmental fines imposed.
Significance:
Showed courts protecting coastal ecosystems and using constitutional principles to enforce environmental law.
3. Key Principles from Case Law
Environmental Impact Must Be Assessed: Courts mandate EIAs for industrial or mining projects.
Strict Liability of Offenders: Illegal logging, mining, and poaching are prosecuted regardless of intent.
Restoration and Compensation: Courts often order reforestation, habitat restoration, or ecological compensation.
Citizen Participation: Public interest litigation plays a crucial role in enforcing environmental laws.
Inter-Agency Coordination: Successful prosecutions often involve forest, wildlife, police, and environmental authorities.
4. Conclusion
Environmental crimes in Pakistan, such as illegal logging, unregulated mining, and wildlife poaching, are increasingly prosecuted with judicial support. Landmark cases like:
Galiyat Forest Logging (2007)
Indus River Sand Mining (2010)
Chinkara Deer Poaching (2012)
Gilgit-Baltistan Marble Mining (2013)
Malakand Forest & Wildlife Case (2015)
Karachi Mangrove Destruction (2016)
illustrate the judiciary’s active role in enforcing laws, ensuring environmental protection, and holding offenders accountable.
Courts consistently emphasize balance between economic activity and ecological preservation, using PEPA, provincial forest laws, and wildlife protection statutes.
RELATED Blog
0 comments