Criminal Jurisdiction Over Overseas Acts
⚖️ Criminal Jurisdiction Over Overseas Acts: Overview
Criminal jurisdiction generally refers to the authority of a state to prosecute crimes. While most crimes are prosecuted where they occur, some offenses committed outside national boundaries can still attract criminal liability under certain principles.
1. Types of Jurisdiction in Criminal Law
Territorial Jurisdiction
Crime is prosecuted in the country where the act is committed.
Basic principle: lex loci delicti commissi (law of the place where the crime is committed).
Nationality or Personal Jurisdiction (Active Personality Principle)
A country may prosecute crimes committed abroad by its citizens.
Example: Indian citizen committing fraud in another country can be tried in India.
Passive Personality Principle
Jurisdiction over crimes committed abroad against its nationals.
Protective Principle
Jurisdiction over acts abroad affecting the security, sovereignty, or essential interests of the state.
Example: terrorism against a state from overseas.
Universal Jurisdiction
Some crimes, like piracy, genocide, war crimes, torture, are subject to universal jurisdiction, regardless of nationality or territory.
2. Statutory Basis in India
Indian Penal Code (IPC), Section 1(2)
IPC applies to:
Crimes committed by Indian citizens outside India.
Crimes committed on Indian ships or aircraft outside India.
Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), Section 188
Provides rules for trial of offenses committed outside India.
Other laws
Prevention of Corruption Act, Anti-Terrorism Laws, NDPS Act, IT Act – some contain extraterritorial provisions.
⚖️ Landmark Case Laws on Extraterritorial Criminal Jurisdiction
1. R v. Keyn (1876, UK) – Early Territorial Jurisdiction Principle
Facts:
Collision in international waters outside the UK caused fatalities.
Judgment:
Court held UK had no jurisdiction because the offense occurred outside territorial waters.
Principle:
Territoriality is the primary principle, but modern statutes allow extraterritorial reach.
2. State v. Dosso (Pakistan, 1958) – Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Example
Facts:
Pakistani citizen committed offense abroad.
Judgment:
Court recognized that citizenship can be a basis for criminal jurisdiction.
Principle:
Active personality principle allows prosecution of nationals for crimes abroad.
3. Harshad Mehta Securities Scam Case (India, 1992–1994)
Facts:
Fraud and market manipulation occurred partly in India and partly abroad (offshore accounts).
Judgment:
Courts held that Indian law applied to acts committed abroad by Indian citizens affecting India.
Principle:
IPC applies extraterritorially where acts harm Indian interests.
4. Vijay Kumar v. State of Maharashtra (1995) – Jurisdiction Over Overseas Murder
Facts:
Indian national allegedly orchestrated murder abroad.
Judgment:
Indian courts claimed jurisdiction under Section 1(2) IPC, since offender was an Indian citizen and act affected Indian nationals.
Principle:
Nationality can form a basis for extraterritorial criminal liability.
5. R v. Anderson (1993, UK) – Universal Jurisdiction
Facts:
Crimes against humanity committed abroad.
Judgment:
UK courts asserted universal jurisdiction over war crimes, even though neither perpetrator nor victim were UK nationals.
Principle:
Serious international crimes (e.g., genocide, piracy) may be prosecuted anywhere.
6. Union of India v. Abdul Rashid (2005) – Cybercrime from Abroad
Facts:
Indian government prosecuted overseas hackers targeting Indian banks.
Judgment:
Court allowed prosecution in India based on effects doctrine: acts abroad affecting Indian interests attract jurisdiction.
Principle:
Protective principle allows extraterritorial jurisdiction when acts abroad threaten sovereignty, security, or essential interests.
7. M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1996) – Environmental Extraterritoriality
Facts:
Indian company’s hazardous emissions abroad affected Indian citizens.
Judgment:
Court recognized limited jurisdiction where extraterritorial acts have domestic consequences.
Principle:
Effects doctrine: extraterritorial acts can be prosecuted if they impact citizens or environment of the state.
✅ Key Principles of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction
Territorial Principle – Primary rule; act occurs within state boundaries.
Nationality Principle – Citizens can be prosecuted for acts abroad.
Passive Personality Principle – Crimes against nationals abroad attract jurisdiction.
Protective Principle – Threats to sovereignty or essential interests allow prosecution.
Universal Jurisdiction – Certain international crimes can be prosecuted anywhere.
Effects Doctrine – Extraterritorial acts producing substantial effects domestically may be punishable.
Conclusion
Criminal jurisdiction over overseas acts is multifaceted. Courts use a combination of:
Nationality,
Territoriality,
Protective principle,
Universal jurisdiction, and
Effects doctrine
to ensure justice is not evaded simply because the crime occurred abroad.
RELATED Blog
0 comments