Domestic Violence Prosecutions Under Women’S Charter
⚖️ 1. Legal Framework
Key Statutes and Provisions
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005
Protects women from physical, sexual, verbal, emotional, and economic abuse within a domestic relationship.
Provides civil remedies: protection orders, residence orders, monetary relief, custody of children.
Provides for criminal consequences: Sec. 31 – Penalty for breach of orders.
IPC Sections applicable in domestic violence
Sec. 498A: Husband or relatives subjecting a woman to cruelty.
Sec. 304B: Dowry death.
Sec. 323, 324: Voluntarily causing hurt with/without dangerous weapons.
CrPC
Criminal procedure for filing complaints and obtaining protection orders.
⚖️ 2. Key Principles in Domestic Violence Prosecutions
Definition of Domestic Violence:
Includes physical, sexual, verbal, emotional, and economic abuse within household or domestic relationship.
Burden of Proof:
PWDVA provides relaxed evidentiary standards: complaints, witness testimony, and documentary evidence sufficient.
Relief Mechanisms:
Protection orders, residence orders, monetary relief, custody, and counseling.
Criminal Prosecution:
Perpetrator can face imprisonment or fines, especially if protection orders are violated or violence escalates to physical injury.
🏛️ 3. Landmark Case Laws
Case 1: Indra Sarma vs. V.K. V. Sarma (2013)
Facts:
A wife filed complaint seeking protection and residence orders against husband under PWDVA.
Judgment:
Supreme Court clarified scope of “domestic relationship”: includes live-in relationships if conditions of shared household are met.
Protection orders extend beyond married women.
Significance:
Recognized live-in partners’ protection under the domestic violence framework.
Case 2: Rajnesh vs. Neha (2021)
Facts:
Dispute over alleged emotional and verbal abuse by husband in a live-in relationship.
Judgment:
Delhi High Court applied PWDVA: even non-physical abuse can trigger protection orders.
Courts can grant monetary relief for emotional distress.
Significance:
Reinforced non-physical forms of domestic violence are actionable.
Case 3: Sangeeta vs. State of Haryana (2010)
Facts:
Wife filed complaint under IPC 498A and PWDVA alleging dowry harassment and cruelty.
Judgment:
Court allowed simultaneous criminal prosecution under IPC and civil remedies under PWDVA.
Observed that PWDVA is not a substitute but a supplement to IPC provisions.
Significance:
Clarified dual remedies are permissible: civil protection + criminal prosecution.
Case 4: Harish Kumar vs. State of Punjab (2015)
Facts:
Husband challenged PWDVA protection order as excessive.
Judgment:
Punjab & Haryana High Court held that PWDVA aims at immediate protection, not punishment.
Protection orders are preventive, not punitive, but violation attracts criminal liability under Sec. 31.
Significance:
Emphasized protective intent of the Act rather than punitive approach.
Case 5: S. Swati vs. Union of India (2019)
Facts:
Woman sought custody of minor children and monetary relief under PWDVA.
Judgment:
Court confirmed custody and maintenance orders under PWDVA are enforceable even against reluctant partners.
Reinforced speedy civil remedy provisions in domestic violence cases.
Significance:
PWDVA empowers women to obtain immediate relief and financial support.
Case 6: Vinita vs. State of UP (2018)
Facts:
Allegations of economic abuse and denial of household maintenance.
Judgment:
Court awarded monetary relief and compensation even without physical abuse.
Emphasized economic abuse as recognized domestic violence under PWDVA.
Significance:
Expanded understanding of financial abuse in domestic relationships.
Case 7: Preeti vs. State of Rajasthan (2017)
Facts:
Complaint for harassment and stalking after separation.
Judgment:
Court held PWDVA extends protection even post-separation, including restraining orders.
Significance:
Shows Act’s continuing protective jurisdiction post-relationship.
🏛️ 4. Key Takeaways from Case Law
| Principle | Case Example |
|---|---|
| Live-in relationships protected | Indra Sarma vs. V.K. V. Sarma |
| Non-physical abuse actionable | Rajnesh vs. Neha |
| Dual remedies: civil + criminal | Sangeeta vs. State of Haryana |
| Protective intent, not punitive | Harish Kumar vs. State of Punjab |
| Custody & maintenance enforceable | S. Swati vs. Union of India |
| Economic abuse recognized | Vinita vs. State of UP |
| Protection post-separation | Preeti vs. State of Rajasthan |
🔐 5. Practical Implications
PWDVA allows immediate protective relief, including restraining orders.
Civil remedies (residence, monetary relief, custody) are separate from criminal prosecution.
Non-physical abuse like verbal, emotional, and economic abuse is recognized.
Protection extends to live-in partners and post-separation cases.
Violation of protection orders is punishable under Sec. 31 of PWDVA.
🏁 6. Summary
Domestic violence prosecutions under the Women’s Charter (PWDVA, 2005) focus on protection, relief, and empowerment, not just punishment.
Courts have consistently expanded protection to:
Live-in relationships (Indra Sarma),
Emotional and economic abuse (Rajnesh, Vinita),
Post-separation protection (Preeti),
Simultaneous criminal prosecution under IPC (Sangeeta).
Landmark cases provide guidance on scope, remedies, and procedural safeguards for victims.
RELATED Blog
0 comments