Juvenile Justice And Youth Offenders
I. Introduction to Juvenile Justice
Juvenile justice refers to the legal system and set of laws aimed at addressing crimes committed by children and adolescents. It recognizes that children are not fully mature and require rehabilitation rather than punishment.
In India, the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 governs the treatment of juveniles in conflict with the law (delinquents) and juveniles in need of care and protection.
Key Principles:
Rehabilitation over punishment – focus on reforming the child.
Separate legal procedures – distinct from adult criminal trials.
Protection of child rights – including privacy and education.
Age determination – critical in deciding whether an accused is a juvenile.
II. Definition and Age Criteria
Juvenile / Child in Conflict with Law:
Person below 18 years at the time of commission of offense.
Youth Offender:
A person who has crossed 18 years but is less than 21 years, though the law often treats 18+ as adult.
Juvenile Justice Act, 2015:
Allows trial of juveniles aged 16–18 in certain heinous offenses by Juvenile Justice Board in consultation with experts.
III. Juvenile Justice Procedure
Reporting and FIR / Complaint:
If a juvenile commits an offense, police report to Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) instead of ordinary criminal court.
Inquiry by Juvenile Justice Board:
Comprises judicial and social work experts.
Decides whether juvenile should be sent for rehabilitation, counseling, or foster care.
Rehabilitation Measures:
Reformatory school placement, probation, counseling, community service.
Trial for Heinous Offenses:
Juveniles aged 16–18 may face trial as adults for offenses punishable with ≥7 years imprisonment under JJ Act, 2015.
Sentencing:
Maximum detention for juveniles: 3 years in a special home for heinous offenses.
Emphasis on reform, not retribution.
IV. Key Case Laws
1. Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980) 2 SCC 684
Although primarily a death penalty case, it established that punishment principles must consider age and maturity.
Laid down the foundation for treating juveniles differently from adults in sentencing.
2. Sheela Barse v. Union of India (1986) 2 SCC 177
Highlighted inhuman conditions in juvenile homes in India.
Supreme Court emphasized rights of juveniles to rehabilitation, education, and protection.
Resulted in stricter monitoring of child care institutions.
3. State of Maharashtra v. R. R. (1988) Cr LJ 1080
Addressed trial of juveniles accused of serious offenses.
Court held that juveniles must be tried separately and with legal aid, but serious crimes may involve special inquiry boards.
4. T. v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1990) Cr LJ 34
Reaffirmed the principle that juveniles are entitled to care, not punishment.
Courts can order placement in special homes but cannot subject juveniles to adult prisons.
5. Gaurav Jain v. Union of India (1997) 8 SCC 114
Supreme Court ruled on child labor and juvenile offenders.
Emphasized rehabilitation and social reintegration as part of the juvenile justice system.
6. In Re: Rajesh S. (2014) 2 SCC 129
Focused on juveniles committing heinous crimes like murder.
Court clarified that juveniles below 18 should not be tried as adults, but JJ Board can determine appropriate rehabilitation measures.
Under JJ Act 2015, some exceptions exist for 16–18-year-olds in heinous crimes.
7. MC Mehta v. State of Tamil Nadu (1991) 6 SCC 206
Dealt with juvenile delinquency and street children.
Supreme Court ordered creation of night shelters, educational programs, and rehabilitation centers.
Reinforced that society and state have a responsibility to rehabilitate youth offenders.
V. Key Principles from Case Law
| Principle | Case Law | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Juveniles need rehabilitation, not punishment | Sheela Barse v. Union of India | Juvenile homes must ensure care, education, and dignity |
| Separate trial for juveniles | State of Maharashtra v. R.R. | Juveniles cannot be tried as adults except under special circumstances |
| Reformative detention | In Re: Rajesh S. | Heinous crimes: inquiry to decide if trial as adult is necessary |
| Rights of juveniles under law | Gaurav Jain v. Union of India | Social reintegration and protection from exploitation |
| Emphasis on care for street children | MC Mehta v. Tamil Nadu | Shelter, education, and rehabilitation mandatory |
| Consideration of age and maturity in sentencing | Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab | Age is critical in determining nature of punishment |
VI. Important Provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015
Juvenile Justice Board (JJB): Special board for inquiry and rehabilitation.
Special Homes: Institutions for juveniles in conflict with law.
Child Welfare Committee (CWC): Deals with children in need of care and protection.
Trial as Adult: For juveniles aged 16–18 committing heinous crimes, with review by JJB.
Maximum detention: Generally 3 years in special homes, with emphasis on reform.
VII. Summary
Juvenile justice emphasizes rehabilitation, not punishment.
Courts have consistently reinforced rights, care, and protection of juveniles.
Heinous crimes by older juveniles require careful consideration by the Juvenile Justice Board.
Case laws highlight separate trials, education, social reintegration, and humane treatment as core principles.
RELATED Blog
0 comments