Assassination And High-Profile Murder Case Verdicts
1. Introduction
High-profile murders or assassinations are cases involving prominent figures such as politicians, social leaders, or public figures. These cases are significant because:
They often involve complex investigations.
They attract national attention.
They set legal precedents in criminal jurisprudence.
Such cases often involve:
Political conspiracies
Premeditated killings
Use of forensic evidence, eyewitness testimony, telecommunication records, and sometimes international cooperation.
2. Landmark Cases in India
Case 1: Assassination of Indira Gandhi (1984)
Facts:
Indira Gandhi, the then Prime Minister of India, was assassinated on 31st October 1984 by her bodyguards, Satwant Singh and Beant Singh, in New Delhi.
The motive was revenge for the Operation Blue Star at the Golden Temple in Amritsar.
Investigation & Forensic Role:
Bullet trajectories were analyzed to reconstruct the attack.
Firearm ballistic tests confirmed the bullets fired came from the assassins’ guns.
Eyewitness accounts of the immediate aftermath corroborated forensic findings.
Trial and Verdict:
Beant Singh was killed on the spot; Satwant Singh was arrested.
Satwant Singh was convicted under Section 302 IPC (murder) and executed in 1989.
Lessons: Highlighted how forensic evidence (ballistics, trajectory, eyewitness) is critical in politically sensitive assassinations.
Case 2: Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi (1991)
Facts:
Rajiv Gandhi, former Prime Minister of India, was killed in a suicide bombing by LTTE militants on 21st May 1991 in Sriperumbudur, Tamil Nadu.
Suicide bomber used an explosive belt, targeting Rajiv Gandhi during a public rally.
Investigation & Forensic Role:
Explosive residues were analyzed to determine the type of explosive (RDX and PETN).
Post-blast reconstruction using forensic and ballistic analysis identified the bomber and the sequence of events.
DNA tests were later used to confirm identities of suspects.
Trial and Verdict:
26 individuals were accused, tried in the TADA Court (Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Act Court).
Convictions: 19 individuals received death sentences (later commuted), others got life imprisonment.
Supreme Court upheld the convictions in 1999.
Lessons: Forensic science (explosive analysis, DNA) and terrorism laws were critical in securing convictions.
Case 3: Murder of Beant Singh, Chief Minister of Punjab (1995)
Facts:
Beant Singh, the Chief Minister of Punjab, was killed in a car bomb blast near the Punjab Civil Secretariat in Chandigarh.
The blast was orchestrated by Khalistani militants.
Investigation & Forensic Role:
Forensic teams analyzed blast patterns, explosive residues, and shrapnel.
Evidence from vehicles and surrounding debris helped identify the type of explosives and timing devices used.
Trial and Verdict:
Several militants were convicted under Sections 302, 120B IPC (murder and criminal conspiracy).
Sentences included life imprisonment and rigorous prison terms.
Case highlighted the importance of forensic blast analysis in politically motivated murders.
Case 4: Murder of Phoolan Devi, “Bandit Queen” (2001)
Facts:
Phoolan Devi, former MP and infamous “Bandit Queen,” was shot dead outside her residence in New Delhi.
The murder was suspected to be orchestrated due to her criminal past and political rivalry.
Investigation & Forensic Role:
Ballistics tests confirmed bullets were fired from a .32 caliber revolver.
CCTV footage and eyewitnesses helped identify the perpetrators.
Trial and Verdict:
Two assailants were arrested and convicted under IPC Sections 302 (murder) and 120B (conspiracy).
Sentences: Life imprisonment.
Lesson: Even high-profile victims require traditional and forensic evidence to secure convictions.
Case 5: Murder of Lalit Maken (1985)
Facts:
Lalit Maken, Congress MP, was killed in a drive-by shooting in Delhi.
Suspected revenge killing linked to the 1984 anti-Sikh riots.
Investigation & Forensic Role:
Ballistic examination confirmed bullets matched weapons recovered from accused.
Fingerprints and forensic examination of crime scene supported the prosecution’s case.
Trial and Verdict:
Accused such as R.K. Anand and others were tried; convictions varied from life imprisonment to acquittal due to lack of evidence.
Lesson: Ballistics and crime scene forensics are central in assassinations.
Case 6: Murder of Naina Sahni (Murder of “Geetika”) – Tandoor Murder Case (1995)
Facts:
Arushi Talwar’s father (Dr. Tandoor) was involved in a high-profile murder case (note: multiple versions exist, but forensic analysis was central).
Victim was burned in a tandoor (clay oven), evidence was destroyed.
Forensic Role:
Forensic reconstruction of burned body, DNA identification, and chemical tests (to identify accelerants) were key.
Highlighted challenges when evidence is deliberately destroyed.
Verdict:
Conviction was based heavily on forensic reports, witness testimony, and circumstantial evidence.
Case 7: Murder of Sohrabuddin Sheikh (2005)
Facts:
Sohrabuddin Sheikh, alleged criminal, was killed in a police encounter.
Case became controversial due to involvement of police officers and political figures.
Investigation & Forensic Role:
Forensic autopsy and ballistic evidence were central in proving it was a planned extrajudicial killing.
Phone records and forensic timelines helped prove conspiracy.
Verdict:
Several police officers and politicians were charged.
Court emphasized forensic timelines and autopsy findings in determining premeditation.
3. Common Legal Provisions Invoked
IPC Sections:
302 – Murder
307 – Attempt to murder
120B – Criminal conspiracy
Evidence Act:
Section 45 – Expert testimony (forensic evidence)
Sections 293, 294 CrPC – Reports of experts admissible in court
Terrorism Acts: (for political assassinations)
TADA, UAPA
4. Key Takeaways
Forensic science is crucial: Ballistics, DNA, explosive analysis, and autopsy reports form the backbone of high-profile murder trials.
Eyewitness and circumstantial evidence complement forensic findings.
Political context complicates cases: Courts rely heavily on scientific evidence to avoid bias.
Tough legal scrutiny: High-profile cases often go to Supreme Court or special courts due to their sensitivity.
RELATED Blog
0 comments