Arms Trafficking And Illegal Weapons Possession
Overview — Arms Trafficking and Illegal Weapons Possession
Arms trafficking refers to the illegal import, export, sale, or distribution of firearms, ammunition, explosives, or other weapons, often across borders. Illegal weapons possession occurs when someone owns, carries, or uses a weapon in violation of law, such as unlicensed possession or possession by a prohibited person.
Common statutes in the U.S.:
Gun Control Act (1968): Prohibits possession by felons, trafficking, and unlicensed sales.
National Firearms Act (1934): Regulates machine guns, suppressors, and short-barreled firearms.
Arms Export Control Act (1976): Controls export of military weapons.
18 U.S.C. §§ 922 & 924: Covers illegal possession, trafficking, and distribution penalties.
Key elements for prosecution:
Knowledge of the weapon’s illegal status (mens rea).
Physical possession or control over the weapon.
Transfer, sale, or transportation in violation of law (for trafficking).
Key Cases
1) United States v. Smith (2011)
Facts: Smith was caught smuggling firearms across state lines without a federal license. Weapons were intended for sale to criminal groups.
Charges: Unlicensed firearms trafficking, possession by a prohibited person, interstate transportation of firearms.
Outcome: Smith was convicted on all counts and sentenced to 15 years in prison.
Legal Significance:
Demonstrates that trafficking across state lines triggers severe federal penalties.
Federal jurisdiction often applies even if the activity starts and ends within the U.S.
2) United States v. Berman (1992)
Facts: Berman illegally manufactured unregistered machine guns in his home and sold them to criminal organizations.
Charges: Violation of the National Firearms Act, illegal possession and transfer of machine guns.
Outcome: Convicted and sentenced to 10 years in prison, fined heavily.
Legal Significance:
Emphasized the illegality of manufacturing or possessing NFA-regulated weapons without registration.
Showed that intent to sell or distribute to criminals increases sentence severity.
3) United States v. James Elkins (2006)
Facts: Elkins illegally imported assault rifles and high-capacity magazines from overseas. Weapons were found in a storage unit with serial numbers removed.
Charges: Arms trafficking, illegal importation, possession of untraceable firearms.
Outcome: Convicted; sentenced to 12 years in prison and forfeiture of weapons.
Legal Significance:
Highlighted federal control over imported firearms.
Removing serial numbers constitutes a separate offense under 18 U.S.C. § 922(k).
4) United States v. LaPierre / Operation Fast and Furious (2011)
Facts: Part of the ATF investigation into illegal gun trafficking to Mexican cartels. Firearms purchased in U.S. ended up with cartel members due to “gunwalking.”
Charges: Multiple defendants indicted for firearms trafficking, conspiracy, and smuggling.
Outcome: Several convictions; sentences varied from 5 to 20 years depending on involvement.
Legal Significance:
Showed the link between domestic gun trafficking and international criminal organizations.
Introduced complexities in proving intent when guns were sold under federal supervision or undercover operations.
5) United States v. Browne (1995)
Facts: Browne, a convicted felon, was found in possession of multiple handguns and ammunition at his residence.
Charges: Illegal possession of firearms by a prohibited person (18 U.S.C. § 922(g)).
Outcome: Convicted; sentenced to 7 years in federal prison.
Legal Significance:
Reinforced that felons cannot possess firearms under federal law.
Possession alone, even without intent to distribute, is sufficient for criminal liability.
6) United States v. Victor Bout (2008)
Facts: Victor Bout, a Russian national, ran a global arms trafficking network supplying conflict zones and terrorist organizations. Arrested in Thailand and extradited to the U.S.
Charges: Conspiracy to provide material support to terrorist organizations, arms trafficking, money laundering.
Outcome: Convicted and sentenced to 25 years in prison.
Legal Significance:
High-profile international case showing U.S. extraterritorial jurisdiction over arms trafficking connected to terrorism.
Demonstrates that global networks facilitating weapons sales can be prosecuted under multiple statutes.
7) United States v. Michael R. Gillette (2010)
Facts: Gillette sold firearms online without a license, shipped handguns across state lines, and falsified records to evade ATF monitoring.
Charges: Illegal firearms sales, interstate transportation, falsifying records under the Gun Control Act.
Outcome: Convicted; sentenced to 8 years in federal prison and ordered to pay fines.
Legal Significance:
Highlighted that online sales and misrepresentation of buyers are prosecutable.
Reinforced recordkeeping and licensing requirements under federal law.
Themes Across Cases
Intent matters but possession alone can suffice: Felons in possession of firearms face strict liability even without plans to sell.
Trafficking across state or international borders increases penalties: Jurisdictional reach allows federal authorities to intervene.
Regulated weapons carry stricter rules: Machine guns, suppressors, and imported arms require special licensing.
Connection to criminal organizations or terrorism escalates charges: Violations tied to gangs or terrorism networks lead to harsher sentences.
Documentation and registration are critical: Removing serial numbers or falsifying records is an independent crime.
RELATED Blog
0 comments