Financial Fraud, Ponzi Schemes, And Insider Trading
I. FINANCIAL FRAUD
Financial fraud refers to deceptive practices to secure unfair financial gain, including bank fraud, stock market manipulation, and misrepresentation in investments.
Legal Framework in India:
Indian Penal Code (IPC): Sections 420 (cheating), 406 (criminal breach of trust), 403 (dishonest misappropriation)
Companies Act, 2013: Sections on corporate fraud and misreporting
Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002
Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) Act, 1992 for capital market fraud
II. PONZI SCHEMES
Ponzi schemes are investment scams where returns to earlier investors are paid from new investors’ funds.
Key Features:
Promises unusually high returns.
Lacks legitimate underlying business.
Collapses when new investments slow down.
Legal Provisions:
IPC Section 420 – Cheating
Companies Act Section 447 – Fraud by company directors
SEBI Regulations – Unregistered schemes and fraudulent investment schemes
III. INSIDER TRADING
Insider trading involves buying or selling securities based on non-public price-sensitive information.
Legal Framework:
SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015
Punishable with fines, disgorgement of profits, and imprisonment
Prohibits directors, employees, or connected persons from misuse of confidential info
IV. LANDMARK CASES
1. Sahara India Real Estate Corp. v. SEBI (2012–2014)
Facts: Sahara raised funds through optionally fully convertible debentures without SEBI approval.
Held: Supreme Court ordered refund of ₹24,000 crores to investors and imposed penalties.
Significance: Landmark for investor protection and SEBI regulatory powers.
2. Harshad Mehta Case (1992)
Facts: Stockbroker manipulated stock prices using bank receipts and fraudulent transactions.
Held: Convicted under IPC Section 420, 406, and SEBI regulations.
Significance: Exposed systemic weaknesses in stock market oversight.
3. Satyam Computers Scam (2009)
Facts: Corporate fraud involving inflated revenue and falsified accounts.
Held: Founder Ramalinga Raju convicted under IPC Sections 409, 420, 120B, and Companies Act fraud provisions.
Significance: Emphasized board accountability and corporate governance reforms.
4. NSE Co-Location Scam (2015–2019)
Facts: Alleged preferential access to trading servers giving unfair advantage.
Held: SEBI investigation led to penalties on executives for insider trading and unfair trading practices.
Significance: Landmark regulation of high-frequency trading and insider abuse.
5. Speak Asia Online Pvt. Ltd. Ponzi Case (2011)
Facts: Collected funds from thousands through online investments promising high returns.
Held: SEBI declared it an illegal collective investment scheme, and arrests followed under IPC Sections 420 and 406.
Significance: Illustrates Ponzi schemes prosecution and investor protection.
6. NSE Algo Trading Case – SEBI Investigation (2020)
Facts: Alleged front-running and insider trading by connected individuals.
Held: SEBI issued penalties and disgorgement of profits.
Significance: Modern case emphasizing cyber monitoring in insider trading detection.
V. PRINCIPLES FROM CASE LAW
Regulatory compliance is mandatory for all financial and investment activities.
Fraudulent schemes like Ponzi schemes are strictly punishable under IPC and SEBI Act.
Insider trading undermines market integrity and is heavily penalized.
Investor protection and transparency are paramount in financial governance.
Courts and SEBI coordinate to enforce penalties, disgorgement, and criminal prosecution.
VI. SUMMARY TABLE
| Case | Year | Issue | Principle |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sahara India | 2012–14 | Illegal fundraising | SEBI powers for investor protection |
| Harshad Mehta | 1992 | Stock manipulation | Criminal prosecution of market fraud |
| Satyam Computers | 2009 | Corporate fraud | Board accountability and governance |
| NSE Co-Location | 2015–19 | Insider trading | Regulation of algorithmic trading |
| Speak Asia | 2011 | Ponzi scheme | Illegal investment schemes prosecuted |
| NSE Algo Trading | 2020 | Insider trading | Cyber monitoring and SEBI enforcement |

0 comments